岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 2129-2142.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1494

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

地震波斜入射下岩质边坡放大效应的数值模拟研究

申辉1, 2,刘亚群1, 2,刘博1, 2,李海波1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-26 接受日期:2022-10-31 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 刘亚群,男,1974年生,博士,研究员,主要从事动荷载作用下边坡稳定性分析相关研究。E-mail: yqliu@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:shenhui19@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:申辉,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩质边坡动力响应及稳定性评价相关研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.42277176,No.51679231)。

Numerical study on the amplification effect of rock slopes under oblique incidence of seismic waves

SHEN Hui1, 2, LIU Ya-qun1, 2, LIU Bo1, 2, LI Hai-bo1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2022-09-26 Accepted:2022-10-31 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42277176, 51679231).

摘要: 近源地震中,地震波入射角对岩质边坡的放大效应影响显著。基于黏弹性人工边界理论和等效节点力原理,结合有限单元法建立了可以考虑地震SV波和P波斜入射的地震动输入方法,研究了岩质边坡的坡角、地震波入射角以及入射波类型对边坡放大效应的影响规律。边坡峰值地面加速度(peak ground acceleration,简称PGA)放大系数结果表明,若仅考虑地震波垂直入射的情况,边坡的动力放大效应可能会被严重低估。此外,边坡坡角的变化和入射波类型的改变也对边坡的放大效应有显著的影响。将计算得到的PGA放大系数与相关规范中建议的放大系数对比发现,规范建议值在一些情况下低估了放大效应。边坡坡顶的加速度频谱结果显示,地震波入射角对坡顶加速度傅里叶谱的主频影响较小,但对其傅里叶谱的幅值影响较大。随着SV波入射角的增大,坡顶水平加速度傅里叶谱幅值整体上变化不显著,而竖向加速度傅里叶谱幅值逐渐增大;随着P波入射角的增大,坡顶竖向加速度傅里叶谱幅值逐渐减小而水平向幅值逐渐增大。引入谱比曲线定量评估了不同入射条件下边坡坡顶的谱放大效应,获得了坡顶谱比峰值的变化规律。

关键词: 岩质边坡, 地震波入射角, 地震响应, 地形效应, P波, SV波

Abstract: The influence of the incident angle of seismic waves on the amplification effect of rock slopes is obvious in near-source earthquakes. Based on the theory of viscous-spring artificial boundary and the principle of equivalent nodal force, a seismic input method for oblique incidence of seismic SV and P waves is established and implemented in the finite element method. Various influencing factors such as slope inclination, incident angle of seismic wave, and type of incident wave are considered, and then a numerical study is conducted to investigate the amplification effect of rock slopes. The results of the peak ground acceleration (PGA) amplification factor of the slope show that the amplification effect of the rock slope may be significantly underestimated if only the vertical incidence of seismic waves is considered. In addition, the slope inclination and the type of incident wave also have a significant influence on the amplification effect. By comparing the calculated results of the PGA amplification factor with those suggested by the Code for Seismic Design of Buildings (GB50011―2010), it is found that the values suggested by the seismic code may underestimate the amplification effect in some cases. The results of the spectral characteristics of the acceleration at the slope crest reveal that the incident angle of the seismic waves has little effect on the main frequency of the Fourier spectrum but has a significant effect on the Fourier amplitude. As the incident angle of the SV-wave increases, the Fourier amplitude of vertical acceleration at the slope crest increases, while the variation of Fourier amplitude of horizontal acceleration is not obvious. As the incident angle of P-wave increases, the Fourier amplitude of vertical acceleration at the slope crest decreases while that of horizontal acceleration increases. Finally, the spectral ratio curve is introduced to quantitatively evaluate the effects of different influencing factors on the spectral amplification of slope crest, and the variation pattern of the peak spectral ratio under different incident conditions is obtained.

Key words: rock slope, incident angle of seismic wave, seismic response, topographic effect, P-wave, SV-wave

中图分类号: 

  • TU445
[1] 刘国锋, 冯坤, 晏长根, 丰光亮, 徐鼎平, 周迟, . 考虑力学参数不确定性的岩质边坡开挖卸荷响应概率评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2115-2128.
[2] 吴宏, 叶治, 张宇亭, 刘华北, . 穿越不同密实度饱和砂土地层的盾构隧道地震响应三维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1204-1216.
[3] 郑长杰, 崔亦秦, 吴琛, 罗通, 栾鲁宝, . 竖向入射S波作用下单桩水平地震响应简化解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 327-336.
[4] 许明, 余小越, 赵元平, 胡家驹, 张潇婷, . 顺倾层状碎裂结构岩质边坡地震动力响应及破坏模式分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 362-372.
[5] 朱赛男, 陈艳华, 王宁, 李伟华, 张为为. 平面P1波入射下海底隧道与海床土交界面 滑移接触效应解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3049-3058.
[6] 胡垚, 雷华阳, 雷峥, 刘英男, . 三向地震作用下叠交隧道地震响应振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 104-116.
[7] 杨肖锋, 鲁祖德, 陈从新, 孙朝燚, 刘轩廷, . 板裂结构顺层岩质边坡滑移−弯曲破坏 机制的力学模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 258-266.
[8] 安军海, 陶连金, 蒋录珍, . 盾构扩挖地铁车站结构地震反应特性振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1277-1288.
[9] 彭刚, 刘云龙, 陈灯红, 候春平, 林天成, 刘云辉, . 基于完美匹配层人工边界的坝-基动力 相互作用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3144-3152.
[10] 高丙丽, 李铎, 李朗, 陈立成, 杨志法, . 基于坐标投影法岩质边坡块体稳定性 分析及其可视化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 181-194.
[11] 蒋水华, 欧阳苏, 冯泽文, 康青, 黄劲松, 杨志刚, . 基于结构面参数概率分布更新的 节理岩质边坡可靠性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2589-2599.
[12] 陈世杰, 肖明, 王小威, 陈俊涛, . 陡倾角断层下地下洞室地震破坏特性数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2600-2610.
[13] 贾宝新, 李峰, 周琳力, 王帅, 刘家顺, . 基于时频分析的微震P波和S波到时联合拾取方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1253-1265.
[14] 巴振宁, 刘世朋, 吴孟桃, 梁建文, . 饱和土中周期排列管桩对平面SV波 隔振的解析求解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 627-637.
[15] 朱赛男, 李伟华, LEE Vincent W, 赵成刚, . 平面P1波斜入射下海底洞室地震响应解析分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 93-103.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .