岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (4): 1014-1025.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0664

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑基质吸力影响的非饱和路堤三维稳定性上限分析

李林,孙砖芹   

  1. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-25 接受日期:2023-08-10 出版日期:2024-04-17 发布日期:2024-04-17
  • 作者简介:李林,男,1986年生,博士,副教授,主要从事交通岩土工程方面的研究工作。E-mail:lilin_sanmao@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52108297);中国博士后基金面上项目(No. 2021M692742);中国博士后基金特别资助项目(No. 2023T160560);陕西省秦创原引用高层次创新创业人才项目(No. QCYRCXM-2022-29);中央高校基本科研业务费(No. 300102212301)。

A three-dimensional upper-bound limit analysis of unsaturated embankment considering matric suction

LI Lin, SUN Zhuan-qin   

  1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China
  • Received:2023-05-25 Accepted:2023-08-10 Online:2024-04-17 Published:2024-04-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52108297), the Genaral Program of Postdoctoral Research Foundation of China (2021M692742), the Special Support Project of China Postdoctoral Foundation (2023T160560), the Qin Chuang Yuan Imported High-level Innovation and Entrepreneurship Talent Project (QCYRCXM-2022-29) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, CHD (300102212301).

摘要: 采用极限上限分析定理构建了路堤失稳的三维旋转破坏机构,继而根据Bishop非饱和土抗剪强度理论,考虑非饱路堤内部基质吸力的空间分布及其随地下水位的变化,建立了路堤破坏土体外力功率与内部能量耗散功率的能量守恒方程,并利用遗传算法编写了非饱和路堤最小上限解的高效搜索算法。通过将非饱和土路堤基底破坏模式退化为边坡破坏模式,并与现有非饱和土边坡稳定性计算结果对比,验证了所提上限解的正确性和遗传搜寻算法的准确性。进一步地,对路堤三维稳定性的关键影响因素展开了系统分析,研究了路堤填土孔径分布、基质吸力、进气值倒数、路堤倾角以及有效内摩擦角等因素对路堤三维稳定性的影响规律。研究表明,非饱和土质路堤的稳定性不仅取决于路堤填土性质,而且依赖于影响土体吸力大小与分布的填土孔径参数和进气值等因素。地下水位升降引起的基质吸力变化对路堤稳定性存在显著影响。研究结果为路堤稳定性精细化分析提供了重要的理论依据。

关键词: 非饱和路堤, 基质吸力, 遗传算法, 三维稳定性, 上限分析

Abstract: A three-dimensional rotational failure mechanism of embankment was built based on the upper limit analysis theorem. Drawing on the shear strength theory of Bishop unsaturated soil and considering the spatial distribution of matrix suction inside the unsaturated embankment and its change with the groundwater level, the energy conservation equation encompassing the external force work rate and the internal energy dissipation rate of the embankment was established. An efficient genetic algorithm was developed to search for the least upper-bound value of unsaturated soil embankment. By degrading the unsaturated soil embankment failure mode into a slope failure mode and comparing critical values with existing unsaturated soil slope stability calculations, the correctness of the proposed upper-bound values and the accuracy of the genetic search algorithm were verified. Furthermore, the influence of the pore size distribution, matrix suction, the inverse of the air entry value, embankment inclination angle and effective internal friction angle on the three-dimensional stability of the embankment was systematically studied. The results demonstrated that the stability of unsaturated soil embankment depends not only on the properties of soil but also on the pore size parameters and the inverse of the air entry value. Additionally, the fluctuation of matric suction resulting from changes in groundwater levels significantly impacts the stability of unsaturated soil embankments. These findings offer an important theoretical basis for granular analysis of embankment stability and the design of ultimate fill height, providing valuable insights for improving embankment stability analysis and facilitating the design of embankments.

Key words: unsaturated embankment, matric suction, genetic algorithm, three-dimensional stability, upper-bound limit analysis

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 罗晓倩, 孔令伟, 鄢俊彪, 高志傲, 田升奎, . 不同饱和度下膨胀土原位孔内剪切试验及强度响应特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 153-163.
[2] 孙闯, 兰思琦, 陶琦, 关喜彬, 韩希平, . 深埋隧道软弱围岩拱顶三维渐进性塌落机制上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2471-2484.
[3] 文少杰, 郑文杰, 胡文乐, . 铅污染对黄土宏观持水性能和微观结构演化的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 451-460.
[4] 邓波, 杨明辉, 王东星, 樊军伟, . 刚性挡墙后非饱和土破坏模式及主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2371-2382.
[5] 董福瑞, 王述红, 侯钦宽. 基于主成分分析的多参数岩体结构面 优势分组方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2457-2470.
[6] 王智超, 罗磊, 田英辉, 张春会, . 非饱和压实土率敏性及蠕变时效特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1816-1824.
[7] 李雨浓, 刘畅, 王立伟, . 地震效应下三维非均质土坡稳定性极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1493-1502.
[8] 贾宝新, 李峰, 潘一山, 周琳力. 基于变步长加速搜索的微震源定位方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 843-856.
[9] 屈春来, 付迪, 刘世伟, 冷先伦, 李建贺, 孙熇远. 非均质成层边坡极限承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2923-2932.
[10] 赵志强, 戴福初, 闵弘, 谭晔, . 原状黄土−古土壤中水分入渗过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2611-2621.
[11] 吴奔, 刘维, 史培新, 付春青. 盾构隧道掘进面失稳螺旋破坏机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 767-774.
[12] 孙志豪, 谭晓慧, 孙志彬, 林鑫, 姚玉川, . 基于上限分析的空间变异土质边坡可靠度[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3397-3406.
[13] 郑方, 邵生俊, 佘芳涛, 袁浩, . 重塑黄土在不同基质吸力下的真三轴剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 156-162.
[14] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[15] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[3] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[4] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[5] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[6] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[7] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[8] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[9] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[10] 卢 正,姚海林,骆行文,胡梦玲. 公路交通荷载作用下分层地基的三维动响应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2965 -2970 .