深基坑土钉支护现场测试分析研究

›› 2003, Vol. 24 ›› Issue (3): 413-416.

深基坑土钉支护现场测试分析研究

贾金青；张明聚；

清华大学土木工程系；石家庄铁道学院研究生处北京 100084 大连理工大学土木工程系；大连 116024；石家庄 050043；

收稿日期:2002-07-19 出版日期:2003-06-10 发布日期:2016-10-16
作者简介:贾金青，男，1962年生，工学博士，副教授，从事岩土工程的研究和设计。

Research on field test of soil nailing for deep excavation

JIA Jin-qing, ZHANG Ming-ju

Civil Engineering Department, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; Civil Engineering Department, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116024, China; Graduate Student Bureau, Shijiazhuang Railway Institute, Shijiazhuang 050043, China

Received:2002-07-19 Online:2003-06-10 Published:2016-10-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 土钉支护技术在我国深基坑开挖和支护中己得到了广泛的应用,但对其工作机理和计算方法的研究尚不完善。以一个基坑土钉支护工程为实例,对基坑水平位移、土钉拉力进行现场测试,得出了土钉水平位移和拉力的分布规律:(1)基坑最大位移发生在基坑顶部;(2)沿基坑深度范围受力最大的土钉在中部;(3)单根土钉最大拉力作用点在其长度的中部,沿基坑深度方向土钉最大拉力作用点的连线形成的曲线是潜在最危险滑动面的位置。

关键词: 深基坑, 土钉支护, 现场测试, 土钉拉力, 水平位移

Abstract: The soil nailing retaining is widely used in China, but the principle and calculating method of soil nail are not so perfect. It is necessary carry out field test to consummate the theory of soil nailing. The testing includes horizontal displacement and soil nail tension etc. The distribution laws of deep excavation horizontal displacement and soil nails tensile forces are obtained through the field test. Some important conclusion are reached: I I I The maximum horizontal displacement occurs on the top of deep excavation; ( 2 ) Along whole depth of deep excavation, the maximum soil nail tensile forces occur in the range of middle depth; 1 3 I The maximum soil nail tensile force occurs in the middle range of soil nails along its length. The curve which is formed by positions of maximum tensile forces of soil nails may be the most dangerous sliding curve.

Key words: deep excavation, soil nailing retaining, field test, soil nail tensile force, horizontal displacement.

中图分类号:

Tu470 .+ 3

贾金青；张明聚； . 深基坑土钉支护现场测试分析研究[J]. , 2003, 24(3): 413-416.

JIA Jin-qing, ZHANG Ming-ju. Research on field test of soil nailing for deep excavation[J]. , 2003, 24(3): 413-416.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[2]	刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[3]	郭红仙, 周鼎. 软土中基坑土钉支护稳定性问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 398-404.
[4]	周勇，朱亚薇, . 深基坑桩锚支护结构和土体之间协同作用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3246-3252.
[5]	周勇，令永强，杨校辉, . 考虑附加应力作用的桩锚支护结构稳定性与位移关系研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2913-2921.
[6]	胡之锋，陈健，邱岳峰，李健斌，周兴涛, . 挡墙水平变位诱发地表沉降的显式解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4165-4175.
[7]	王正振，龚维明，戴国亮，王晓阳，李亮亮，肖刚,. 厚垫层-砂桩复合地基现场试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3755-3762.
[8]	谢涛，罗强，周成，张良，蒋良潍, . 高速铁路小变形下陡坡地基路肩桩板墙力学响应[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 45-52.
[9]	贾金青，高军程，涂兵雄，张磊，王海涛，高仁哲,. 深基坑中压力型预应力锚杆柔性支护结构的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 304-310.
[10]	张媛，董建华，董旭光，王永胜, . 季节性冻土区土钉边坡支护结构冻融反应分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 574-582.
[11]	曾超峰，薛秀丽，郑刚，. 软土区基坑预降水引起支护墙侧移的典型参数影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3295-3303.
[12]	曾超峰，薛秀丽，郑刚,. 软土地基渗透性条件对基坑预降水过程中支护墙侧移的影响研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 3039-3047.
[13]	庄海洋，张艳书，薛栩超，徐烨,. 深软场地地铁狭长深基坑变形特征实测与已有统计结果的对比分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 561-570.
[14]	张戈，毛海和. 软土地区深基坑围护结构综合刚度研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1467-1474.
[15]	陈昆，闫澍旺，孙立强，王亚雯,. 开挖卸荷状态下深基坑变形特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1075-1082.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed