›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (7): 2072-2076.

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

厚层沉渣嵌岩桩承载性状研究

王铁行,刘 衡,杨 波   

  1. 西安建筑科技大学 土木工程学院,西安 710055
  • 收稿日期:2012-07-13 出版日期:2013-07-10 发布日期:2013-07-15
  • 作者简介:王铁行,男,1968年生,博士,教授,博导,主要从事黄土、冻土工程设计理论和方法等方面研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No. 51078309)

Research on bearing behavior of rock-socketed piles in thick sediments

WANG Tie-hang,LIU Heng,YANG Bo   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Achitecture and Technology, Xi’an 710055, China
  • Received:2012-07-13 Online:2013-07-10 Published:2013-07-15

摘要: 首先对嵌岩桩进行了现场钻孔抽芯试验和静力载荷试验,试验结果表明:当采用冲击成孔工法施工且桩侧存在弱胶结土层时,桩底沉渣厚度普遍较大,远厚于规范允许值;当荷载达一定值时,呈现突发性下沉且下沉量较大,主要与厚层沉渣导致端阻力未发挥作用有关。试验结果说明:当采用冲击成孔工法施工且桩侧存在弱胶结土层时,现有嵌岩桩设计方法同时考虑端阻和侧阻作用是不妥的,嵌岩桩单桩承载力宜仅按土层和嵌岩段侧阻力确定。进一步基于数值分析对嵌岩段摩阻力分布及变形等承载性状进行研究。在施加荷载一定条件下,嵌岩深度与基岩强度越大,下沉量越小,且厚层沉渣嵌岩桩沉降存在嵌岩深度效应。随着桩顶荷载增大,嵌岩深度与基岩强度差异导致的下沉量的差值增大。嵌岩段桩侧摩阻力沿深度呈马鞍型分布,嵌岩深度与基岩强度较小时,嵌岩段下部峰值比上部峰值大;嵌岩深度与基岩强度较大时,嵌岩段下部峰值则比上部峰值小。在桩顶荷载一定条件下,嵌岩深度越小,下沉量越大,越有利于侧摩阻力发挥,嵌岩段桩侧摩阻力越大。由于厚层沉渣存在,嵌岩段桩身轴力沿深度方向从桩顶荷载逐渐衰减为0,嵌岩深度越小,衰减速度越快。

关键词: 嵌岩桩, 厚层沉渣, 承载力, 抽芯试验

Abstract: In situ core-drilling tests and static loading tests are carried out on rock-socketed pile. The test results show that when using the impact pore-forming construction and the upper part is a weakly cemented soil, pile bottom sediment thickness is generally larger, which is much thicker than the specified value by the foundation code. When the load reached a certain value, sudden and large subsidence is observed, because the end resistance does not take effect due to the existence of a thick layer of sediments. The test results indicate that the current design method of rock-socketed pile which considering both of the end and side resistance is not appropriate when impact pore-forming construction is used and there is weakly cemented soil around the pile. The bearing capacity of single rock-socketed pile should be determined by side resistance in soil and the socketed segment in rock. Numerical analysis is carried out on the distribution of side resistance of the rock-socketed segment and deformation and load carrying capacity of the pile. Under a given applied load, smaller settlement is observed when socketed thickness and rock strength is greater. With the increase of the applied load on pile top, settlement difference caused by the variation of socketed thickness and rock strength increases. The distribution of side resistance of the socketed segment along the vertical direction shows a double-peak saddle shape. When the socketed thickness and rock strength are smaller, the lower peak is higher than the upper peak. When the socketed thickness and rock strength are larger, the lower peak is lower than the upper peak. Under a given applied load on the pile top, smaller socketed thickness would result in larger settlement and side resistance. Due to the thick layer of sediment, the axial force of the rock-socketed segment of the pile gradually decreases from the applied load on pile top to zero along vertical direction, the smaller the socketed thichness, the faster the decrease rate.

Key words: rock-socketed piles, thick sediments, bearing capacity, on-site drilling test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.11
[1] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[2] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[3] 张雷, 王宁伟, 景立平, 方晨, 董瑞, . 电渗排水固结中电极材料的对比试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3493-3501.
[4] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 章涵, 周昌, 龚辉, . 嵌岩桩负摩阻力现场试验与计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3610-3617.
[5] 袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板 临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[6] 穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘 旸, 刘 泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[7] 李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾 旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[8] 王宇飞, 刘 润. 砂土中浅埋管道在竖向−水平荷载空间的 承载力包络线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1129-1139.
[9] 王冬勇, 陈曦, 于玉贞, 吕彦楠, . 基于二阶锥规划有限元增量加载法的条形浅基础极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[10] 冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[11] 陈昌富, 邱琳淇, 毛凤山, 周志军, . 基于加权扰动共生生物搜索算法 桩网复合地基优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4477-4485.
[12] 周同和, 郜新军, 郭院成, 孙轶斌, . 下部扩大段复合桩抗拔承载力设计方法与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3778-3782.
[13] 宗钟凌,鲁先龙,李青松,. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[14] 熊晓荣,汤 华,廖明进,尹小涛,王东英, . 隧道锚“楔形效应”的室内模型试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 181-190.
[15] 尹君凡,雷 勇,陈秋南,刘一新,邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 祝云华,刘新荣,舒志乐. 对“‘深埋隧道开挖围岩失稳突变模型研究’讨论”的答复[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3215 -3216 .
[2] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[3] 黄建华,宋二祥. 大型锚碇基础围护工程冻结帷幕力学性态研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3372 -3378 .
[4] 王观石,李长洪,陈保君,李世海. 应力波在非线性结构面介质中的传播规律[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3747 -3752 .
[5] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[6] 邓 琴,郭明伟,李春光,葛修润. 基于边界元法的边坡矢量和稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1971 -1976 .
[7] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[8] 闫 铁,李 玮,毕雪亮. 基于分形方法的多孔介质有效应力模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2625 -2629 .
[9] 徐维生,柴军瑞,陈兴周,孙旭曙. 岩体裂隙网络非线性非立方渗流研究与应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 53 -57 .
[10] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .