桩承式路堤承载特性的颗粒流模拟

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S1): 501-507.

桩承式路堤承载特性的颗粒流模拟

许朝阳^1,2，周健¹，完绍金²

1. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室，上海 210009；2. 扬州大学岩土工程研究所，江苏扬州 225009

收稿日期:2012-01-04 出版日期:2013-08-30 发布日期:2014-06-09
作者简介:许朝阳，女，1971年生，博士研究生，主要从事地基基础工程的研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助(No. 50908198)；扬州大学创新培育基金资助(No. 20020183061)；江苏省高校自然科学基金资助(No. 09KJB580004)。

Simulation of bearing characteristics of pile-supported embankments by particle flow code

XU Zhao-yang^1,2，ZHOU Jian¹，WAN Shao-jin²

1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 210009, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering , Yangzhou University, Yangzhou，Jiangsu 225009, China

Received:2012-01-04 Online:2013-08-30 Published:2014-06-09

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 现有的土拱效应计算方法中，由于采用的计算模型不同，计算结果差异很大。文中克服传统连续介质力学模型的宏观连续性假设，采用二维颗粒流程序（PFC）建立基于模型试验的细观数值分析模型，对桩承式路堤中土体接触力、应力分布、主应力方向、竖向位移进行分析，并比较计算和实测结果，研究土拱效应的荷载传递机制。同时，对不同桩帽、桩间距、填土高度、颗粒大小、摩擦角的情况进行PFC方法的参数敏感性分析。研究结果表明，桩承式路堤桩顶处局部范围可按弹性核考虑；土拱的分布型式受桩帽型式、桩净距、格栅的影响；实际土拱作用的影响范围主要集中在路堤底面以上约1倍桩净距的区域；土拱内部的竖向应力和水平应力均随深度非线性改变，桩土应力比随着荷载水平、土体内摩擦角、颗粒大小的增大而增加。

关键词: 桩承式路堤, 土拱效应, PFC颗粒流分析, 桩土应力比

Abstract: Several methods are available for account the soil aching effect in the pile-supported embankment; but these present methods produce dramatically different results partially due to the different analysis models. To avoid the macro continuity hypothesis of traditional continuum mechanics model, a two-dimensional numerical model using particle flow code(PFC) has been established to simulate soil arching effect of pile-supported embankment. One part of the numerical analysis deals with load transfer mechanisms by investigating the contact stress, stress distribution and vertical displacement. Also the simulated results have been compared with model test results. The other part of numerical analysis consists to a parametrical study investigating the influence of the size of the pile cap, pile spacing, the fill height, particle size and the friction angle of embankment. It is shown that: (1) The local soil on the top of pile can be regarded as elastic nucleus. Soil arch forms were affected by forms of the pile cap, clear spacing of pile cap and geogrid. (2) The soil aching area is located around one time pile cap clear spacing over the bottom of embankment. (3) The vertical stress and lateral stress in the inner arching vary with depth nonlinearly and pile -soil stress ratio increases with the load level , the friction angle and particle size of soil.

Key words: pile-supported embankments, soil arching effect, particle flow code(PFC), pile-soil stress ratio

中图分类号:

TU 443

许朝阳，周健，完绍金 . 桩承式路堤承载特性的颗粒流模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 501-507.

XU Zhao-yang ，ZHOU Jian ，WAN Shao-jin . Simulation of bearing characteristics of pile-supported embankments by particle flow code[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 501-507.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[2]	芮瑞, 叶雨秋, 陈成, 涂树杰. 考虑墙壁摩擦影响的挡土墙主动土压力非线性分布研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1797-1804.
[3]	陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, . 考虑土拱效应的管棚合理间距计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1993-2000.
[4]	刘洋, 于鹏强. 刚性挡土墙平移模式的土拱形状与主动土压力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 506-516.
[5]	尹志强，佘成学，姚海林，卢正，骆行文，. 考虑土拱效应的黏性填土排桩桩后土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 131-139.
[6]	赖丰文，陈福全，万梁龙,. 考虑不完全土拱效应的浅层地基竖向应力计算[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2546-2554.
[7]	徐长节，梁禄钜，陈其志，刘元昆，. 考虑松动区内应力分布形式的松动土压力研究[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1927-1934.
[8]	姜文雨, 刘一, . 刚性桩复合地基中性面深度与桩土应力比计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4554-4560.
[9]	李连祥，黄佳佳，符庆宏，成晓阳，胡峰, . 不同置换率复合地基力学性状附加荷载影响规律离心试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 131-139.
[10]	杨贵，王阳阳，刘彦辰, . 基于曲线滑裂面的挡墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2182-2188.
[11]	李瑞林，周国庆，林超，赵光思，陈国舟,. 考虑土拱效应的滑移面间非极限状态土压力解答[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3145-3153.
[12]	沈才华，王媛，李鹤文，胡玉田，. 基于扩孔理论的挤密砂桩复合地基桩土应力比计算方法[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2873-2880.
[13]	孙潇昊，缪林昌，林海山. 不同埋深砂土盾构隧道掘进开挖面前方土拱效应研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2980-2988.
[14]	朱冰儿，齐昌广，鲍娇蕾. 路堤荷载下塑料套管桩荷载传递机制的现场试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 658-664.
[15]	刘忠玉，陈捷，李东阳,. 考虑剪应力作用的刚性挡土墙主动土压力分析[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2443-2450.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed