›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 1052-1059.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.04.016

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

含软弱夹层顺层岩质边坡传递函数及其应用研究

范 刚1, 2，张建经1, 2，付 晓1, 2   

  1. 1. 西南交通大学 土木工程学院 岩土工程系，四川 成都 610031；2. 西南交通大学 交通隧道工程教育部重点实验室，四川 成都 610031
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-22 出版日期:2017-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:范刚，男，1988年生，博士，主要从事岩土工程抗震方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    交通运输部建设科技项目(No. 2013318800020)；国家重点基础研究发展计划（973计划）(No. 2011CB013605)。

Research on transfer function of bedding rock slope with soft interlayers and its application

FAN Gang1, 2, ZHANG Jian-jing1, 2 , FU Xiao1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, School of Civil Engineering, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Transportation Tunnel Engineering of Ministry of Education, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610031, China
  • Received:2015-04-22 Online:2017-04-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Research Program of Ministry of Transport of the People's Republic of China (2013318800020) and the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2011CB013605).

PDF (Chinese)

1042

摘要： 基于大型振动台模型试验及传递函数理论，对含软弱夹层顺层岩质边坡的绝对传递函数和相对传递函数进行了对比分析，探讨了两种传递函数计算边坡动力特性参数的准确性，并对利用传递函数估算边坡频域动力响应的可行性进行了研究。研究结果表明，采用坡面及坡内加速度时程计算得到的传递函数曲线形态相近，幅值差别较小；相对传递函数实部比绝对传递函数实部小1，绝对传递函数和相对传递函数虚部重合，且两种传递函数虚部峰值两侧对称性较好，利用传递函数虚部计算边坡动力特性参数准确性较高。在频率大于10 Hz部分，相对传递函数模趋于1，绝对传递函数模趋于0。利用两种传递函数虚部及相对传递函数模计算得到的边坡固有频率十分接近。两种传递函数模计算得到的阻尼比比较准确，计算结果表明，含软弱夹层顺层岩质边坡的阻尼比大于均质岩质边坡。利用两种传递函数虚部及模计算得到的含软弱夹层顺层岩质边坡加速度振型相同。利用绝对传递函数估算含软弱夹层顺层岩质边坡频域动力响应的准确性高于相对传递函数估算结果。利用传递函数对输入地震动的频谱特性进行修正有利于保证含软弱夹层顺层岩质边坡动力响应研究输入机制的合理性。

关键词: 软弱夹层, 顺层, 岩质边坡, 传递函数, 振动台试验

Abstract: A large scale shaking table test was conducted on the bedding rock slope with soft interlayers in this paper. Based on the transfer function theory, we analyzes the relative transfer function and absolute transfer function of this slope. The effect of these two kinds of transfer function on function characteristics and the calculation of seismic parameters is studied. The feasibility and accuracy of estimating the frequency domain response by the transfer function is also analyzed. The results show that the transfer functions calculated by the acceleration near slope face and in the middle of slope body have similar form, and there is small amplitude difference. The real part of relative transfer function is less 1 than that of absolute transfer function. The imaginary part of two kinds of transfer function is the same, and both sides of imaginary part have a high degree of symmetry. Thus seismic parameters calculated by the imaginary part have high accuracy. When the frequency is greater than 10 Hz, the module of relative transfer function is close to 1, while the module of absolute transfer function is approximately 0. The natural frequency obtained by the imaginary part is similar to that calculated by the module of relative transfer function. The damping ratios calculated by the modules of relative and absolute transfer functions are accurate. This study shows that the damping ratio of bedding rock slope with soft interlayers is lager than that of homogenous rock slope. The acceleration mode calculated by the imaginary part is the same as that by module of two kinds of transfer function. The estimation of frequency domain seismic response of bedding rock slope with soft interlayers by absolute transfer function is more accurate than relative transfer function. The correction of spectral characteristics for input ground motion can guarantee the reasonable mechanism of input ground motion on dynamic response of bedding rock slope with soft interlayers.

Key words: soft interlayer, bedding, rock slope, transfer function, shaking table test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457

[1] 徐超, 罗敏敏, 任非凡, 沈盼盼, 杨子凡. 加筋土柔性桥台复合结构抗震性能的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[2] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[3] 杨长卫, 童心豪, 王栋, 谭信荣, 郭雪岩, 曹礼聪, . 地震作用下有砟轨道路基动力响应 规律振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[4] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[5] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[6] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[7] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[8] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[9] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[10] 李平, 张宇东, 薄涛, 辜俊儒, 朱胜. 基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[11] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[12] 周子涵, 陈忠辉, 王建明, 张凌凡, 年庚乾. 爆破荷载作用下露天矿边坡稳定性的突变研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 849-857.
[13] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[14] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[15] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发