›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (10): 2957-2964.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

主应力轴循环旋转下高密实粉土稳定性影响研究

沈 扬1, 2,闫 俊1, 2,刘汉龙1, 2,张 健1, 2   

  1. 1.河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,南京 210098;2.河海大学 岩土工程科学研究所,南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-08 出版日期:2011-10-10 发布日期:2011-10-13
  • 作者简介:沈扬,男,1980年生,博士后,副教授,主要从事土的静、动力学特性和本构理论的研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 50639010,No. 50909039);教育部博士点基金新教师基金项目资助(No. 200802941019);中国博士后科学基金资助项目(No. 20080441021)。

Stability of high relative density silt under cyclic principal stress axis rotation

SHEN Yang1, 2, YAN Jun1, 2, LIU Han-long1, 2, ZHANG Jian1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China; 2. Geotechnical Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, China
  • Received:2010-01-08 Online:2011-10-10 Published:2011-10-13

摘要: 为研究主应力轴循环旋转对粉土性状影响,对长江入海口高密实饱和粉土进行了主应力轴180°转幅的循环旋转试验。试验发现,等向固结的高密实粉土在恒定动剪应力比的主应力轴循环旋转下能发生孔压达到初始围压水平的液化破坏,但液化前孔压开展会因动应力水平的不同而呈现以渐变相态点和激变相态点区分的3阶段变化形式,或仅以激变相态点区分的两阶段变化形式。试样应变开展则始终呈现由崩塌点区分的两阶段变化形式,且孔压激变相态点与应变崩塌点同步反映了土体结构崩塌状态,崩塌状态时主应变差双向幅值限制在0.2%~0.4%这一较小范围内。试样进行主应力轴旋转达到崩塌时的应力状态与频率无显著关系,可由 - 空间中一条准不稳定状态线归一化。而以崩塌状态为终点进行归一化的主应力轴循环旋转下孔压振次曲线,可用修正的Seed公式进行较好拟合

关键词: 主应力轴循环旋转, 粉土, 高密实度, 相态点, 崩塌状态, 孔压

Abstract: Hollow cylinder samples tests were performed with high-density saturated silt from the sea entrance of the Yangtze River. The stress paths consisted of undrained cyclic principal stress rotation at the range of 180° with different shear stress ratio and frequency. It is found that isotropic consolidated samples would liquefy after cyclic principal stress axis rotation, which is featured by the excess pore water pressure reached initial effective confining pressure. Before the liquefaction, due to the different shear stress levels the development of pore water pressure was divided into three stages by graded phase transformation point and cataclysmic phase transformation point or two stages by cataclysmic phase transformation point. As for the development of strain components, it was divided into two stages by collapse point. Meanwhile the cataclysmic phase transformation point of pore water pressure and the collapse point of strain occurred simultaneously, which reflected the state of structure collapse. Besides the deviator strains when the collapse state occured were limited within a narrow range of 0.2%-0.4%. The stress state of collapse can be normalized in - space with a line when samples underwent cyclic principal stress axis rotation after isotropic consolidation. Furthermore the development of pore water pressure can be fitted well by modified Seed model in which the collapse state was used as the normalized denominator.

Key words: cyclic principal stress axis rotation, silt, high relative density, phase transformation point, collapse state, pore water pressure

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 唐晓武, 柳江南, 杨晓秋, 俞悦. 开孔管桩动孔压消散特性的理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3335-3343.
[2] 张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[3] 莫振泽, 王梦恕, 李海波, 钱勇进, 罗跟东, 王辉, . 粉砂地层中浓泥土压盾构泥膜效应引起的 孔压变化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2257-2263.
[4] 赵丁凤, 梁 珂, 陈国兴, 熊 浩, 周正龙, . 剪切-体积应变耦合的孔压增量模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1832-1840.
[5] 夏唐代, 郑晴晴, 陈秀良, . 基于累积动应力水平的间歇加载下超孔压预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1483-1490.
[6] 马文冠, 刘 润, 练继建, 郭绍曾. 粉土中筒型基础贯入阻力的研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1307-1312.
[7] 丁伯阳, 宋宥整. 饱和土地下源u-P形式解答动力响应计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 474-480.
[8] 蒙宇涵, 陈征, 冯健雪, 李红坡, 梅国雄, . 初始孔压非均布下一维地基砂垫层优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4793-4800.
[9] 王丽艳, 巩文雪, 曹晓婷, 姜朋明, 王炳辉. 砾钢渣抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3741-3750.
[10] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 液化自由场地震响应大型振动台模型试验分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3767-3777.
[11] 周恩全, 王琼, 宗之鑫, 陆建飞. 饱和橡胶砂动力特性动三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3797-3804.
[12] 杨文保, 吴琪, 陈国兴, . 长江入海口原状土动剪切模量预测方法探究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3889-3896.
[13] 黄珏皓, 陈 健, 孔令智, 刘府生, 柯文汇, 邱岳峰, 李健斌, . 考虑循环围压与振动频率影响的 饱和软黏土动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 173-182.
[14] 朱 宁,周 洋,刘 维,史培新,吴 奔, . 苏州粉土地层地连墙施工对地层扰动影响研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 529-536.
[15] 张 德,刘恩龙,刘星炎,宋丙堂, . 冻结粉土强度准则探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3237-3245.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 蒋建平,高广运,章杨松. 桩端岩土强度提高对超长桩桩身总侧阻力的强化效应研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2609 -2615 .
[2] 杨爱武,闫澍旺,杜东菊,赵瑞斌,刘 举. 碱性环境对固化天津海积软土强度影响的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2930 -2934 .
[3] 王贤敏,牛瑞卿,吴 婷. 三峡库区岩性智能分类研究[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2946 -2950 .
[4] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[5] 王 沛,柴寿喜,王晓燕,魏 丽,李 敏. 麦秸秆加筋盐渍土重型击实效果的影响因素分析[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 448 -452 .
[6] 陈 林,张永兴,冉可新. 考虑剪应力作用的挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 219 -223 .
[7] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[8] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[9] 宋义敏 ,姜耀东 ,马少鹏 ,杨小彬 ,赵同彬 . 岩石变形破坏全过程的变形场和能量演化研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1352 -1356 .
[10] 夏艳华 ,白世伟 . 基于水平集的复杂三维地层模型建模及在地下工程中的应用研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1445 -1450 .