基于安全预警分级的基坑安全模糊评价研究

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (12): 3693-3700.

基于安全预警分级的基坑安全模糊评价研究

傅志峰¹，罗晓辉²，李杰²，熊朝辉³，吴晓云¹

1.武汉地铁集团有限公司，武汉 430030；2.华中科技大学岩土与地下工程研究所，武汉 430074； 3.中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司，武汉 430063

收稿日期:2011-04-29 出版日期:2011-12-10 发布日期:2011-12-13
作者简介:傅志峰，1977年生，博士，高级工程师，主要从事地铁工程施工、安全管理工作

Study of fuzzy evaluation of foundation pit safety based on classification of safety early warning

FU Zhi-feng¹, LUO Xiao-hui², LI Jie², XIONG Chao-hui³, WU Xiao-yun¹

1. Wuhan Metro Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430030, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China; 3. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan 430063, China

Received:2011-04-29 Online:2011-12-10 Published:2011-12-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在基坑施工过程中，基坑围护结构设计的稳定安全系数是不可测的，因此，《建筑基坑支护技术规程》（JGJ120－99）和《建筑基坑工程监测技术规范》（GB50497－2009）要求不同安全等级基坑的施工过程中有不同类型的监测项目，并给予相应的安全预警值。由于施工监测项目数据的不同步性，为避免对施工过程安全状态的“突发性”以及应对不同安全状态措施的需要，提出了安全预警分级方法。根据监测项目的实测数据，采用模糊数学方法定义了广义稳定系数评估施工过程的安全状态，并给出了广义稳定系数的安全下限。基于实际工程的监测数据，分析了不同监测项目广义稳定系数的变化过程，指出了安全控制的重点监测内容。

关键词: 基坑, 安全预警值, 安全预警分级, 模糊数学, 广义稳定系数

Abstract: Buckling safety factor of the design for supporting structure of foundation pit engineering is unmeasurable in the process of construction; so the different types of monitoring projects for the different safe states of foundation pit engineering are stipulated by the JGJ120-99, which is Technical Specification for Retaining and Protection of Building Foundation Excavations (in Chinese), and the GB50497-2009, which is Technical Code for Monitoring of Building Foundation Pit Engineering (in Chinese). At same time, the safety alarming value is suggested respectively. Because of the asynchronism of monitoring data and with a view to avoid the burstiness of unsafe state of working progress of pit and demand for coping behavior of different safe states, the classifying method of safe state is suggested. In light of observed data of the different monitoring projects, the generalized stability factor is defined using the theory of fuzzy mathematics by which the destination is to estimate the safe state of work progress, and safe toplimit of the generalized stability factor is given. As a real example, the developing process of generalized stability factors for different monitoring projects are analyzed based on fuzzy calculation of observed data and the priority monitoring project of security control is pointed out.

Key words: foundation pit, safety alarming value on monitoring, classification of safe alarming state, fuzzy mathematics, generalized stability factor

中图分类号:

TD 853.34

傅志峰　，罗晓辉　，李杰　，熊朝辉　，吴晓云　. 基于安全预警分级的基坑安全模糊评价研究[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3693-3700.

FU Zhi-feng　, LUO Xiao-hui　, LI Jie　, XIONG Chao-hui　, WU Xiao-yun　. Study of fuzzy evaluation of foundation pit safety based on classification of safety early warning[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3693-3700.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2]	魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[3]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4]	丁智, 张霄, 金杰克, 王立忠, . 基坑全过程开挖及邻近地铁隧道变形实测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 415-423.
[5]	申翃, 李晓, 雷美清, 徐文博, 余秀玲, . 剪力键支护体系的构想及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2574-2580.
[6]	余瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[7]	谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[8]	刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[9]	钟国强, 王浩, 孔利, 王成汤, . 基于T-S模糊故障树的地连墙+支撑支护基坑坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1569-1576.
[10]	李连祥, 刘嘉典, 李克金, 黄亨利, 季相凯, . 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[11]	郑刚, 栗晴瀚, 哈达, 程雪松, . 天津市承压层应力状态及减压引发沉降规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 285-294.
[12]	王克忠, 金志豪, 杨麦珍, 刘先亮, 刘华, . 取水塔基坑开挖过程倒悬岩坎围堰渗透稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 415-422.
[13]	张骁, 肖军华, 农兴中, 郭佳奇, 吴楠, . 基于HS-Small模型的基坑近接桥桩开挖变形影响区研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 263-273.
[14]	刘成禹，郑智享，. 改进的基于p-y曲线的基坑围护结构计算方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 446-452.
[15]	周勇，朱亚薇, . 深基坑桩锚支护结构和土体之间协同作用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3246-3252.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed