离石地区湿陷性黄土地基强夯参数的试验研究

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 2903-2909.

离石地区湿陷性黄土地基强夯参数的试验研究

胡长明¹，梅源¹，王雪艳^{1, 2}

1. 西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院，西安 710055；2. 西安建筑科技大学华清学院，西安 710043

收稿日期:2012-03-28 出版日期:2012-10-10 发布日期:2012-10-19
作者简介:胡长明，男，1963年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩土工程理论及施工技术的研究
基金资助:
陕西省科技攻关计划(No. 2011k10-20)；包头市科技计划项目(No. 2011x1006)

Experimental research on dynamic compaction parameters of collapsible loess foundation in Lishi region

HU Chang-ming¹, MEI Yuan¹, WANG Xue-yan^{1, 2}

1. College of Civil Engineering, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710055, China; 2. Huaqing College, Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi'an 710043, China

Received:2012-03-28 Online:2012-10-10 Published:2012-10-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对离石地区超高填方下深厚湿陷性黄土地基强夯加固参数及效果开展了系列试验研究，分析了强夯前、后各试验区平均夯沉量和土体主要物理力学指标的变化规律，并给出2 000、3 000、6 000 kN•m 能级条件下强夯加固的夯点中心距、最佳击数、停夯标准及有效加固深度等主要参数，在此基础上确定了强夯有效加固深度的估算方法。试验结果表明，离石地区深厚湿陷性黄土地基强夯处理后加固效果显著，有效加固深度范围内黄土湿陷性基本消除；离石或类似地区湿陷性黄土地基采用2 000 kN•m及其以上能级进行强夯处理后，地基承载力特征值均可达到300 kPa以上，土体变形模量大于25 MPa，强夯有效加固深度可采用修正Menard公式进行估算，修正系数可取0.35～0.37；2 000、3 000、6 000 kN•m 能级强夯最佳击数分别为11、10、10击，有效加固深度分别为5、6、9 m，夯点中心距分别为4、4、5 m，且分别可将点夯最后两击的平均夯沉量不大于5、5、10 cm作为停夯标准。试验研究成果可为同类工程的设计与施工提供参考。

关键词: 湿陷性黄土, 强夯, 标准贯入试验, 静载荷试验, 工艺参数

Abstract: A series of tests are carried out to study the dynamic compaction parameters and their effects on the deep collapsible loess foundation under super-high fill in Lishi region. Analyses are made on the average settlement of each test area before and after dynamic compaction and on the regularity of the main physical and mechanical indexes of soil. The main parameters are gained, such as the centre distance of dynamic compaction points, the best impact number, the standard of cutting out, and the effective reinforcement depth under the energy levels of 2 000 kN•m, 3 000 kN•m or 6 000 kN•m; hence, the empirical formula of the effective reinforcement depth of dynamic compaction is given. The results of the tests show that the deep collapsible loess foundation in Lishi region can be effectively reinforced by dynamic compaction and that the loess collapse in the reinforced range is removed. Moreover, the results show that after dynamic compaction above the energy level of 2000 kN•m, the eigenvalue of the bearing capacity of collapsible loess foundations in Lishi or similar regions can reach over 300 kPa, the foundation soil deformation modulus is more than 25 MPa, and the effective reinforcement depth can be computed by the modified formula Menard, in which the modified coefficient is 0.35-0.37. Furthermore, the results indicate that under the energy levels of 2 000 kN•m, 3 000 kN•m or 6 000 kN•m, the best impact numbers of dynamic compaction are 11, 10 and 10 respectively; the effective reinforcement depths are 5 m, 6 m and 9 m respectively; the optimum centre distances of dynamic compaction points are 4m, 4m and 5m respectively; and the average settlements of the last two impacts, which are not more than 5 cm, 5 cm and 10 cm respectively, can be used as the optimum standards of cutting out. Therefore, the results of the tests can provide a reference for the design and construction of engineering projects of the same kind.

Key words: collapsible loess, dynamic compaction, standard penetration test, static load test, technological parameter

中图分类号:

TU 472

胡长明，梅源，王雪艳 . 离石地区湿陷性黄土地基强夯参数的试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2903-2909.

HU Chang-ming , MEI Yuan , WANG Xue-yan . Experimental research on dynamic compaction parameters of collapsible loess foundation in Lishi region[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 2903-2909.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	唐国艺, 刘智, 刘争宏, 唐立军, 于永堂, 姜文, . 低能级强夯在安哥拉Quelo砂中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 203-209.
[2]	窦锦钟, 邵雪莹, 廖晨聪, 陈锦剑, . 不同夯点布置形式下群夯加固效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 527-534.
[3]	朱彦鹏, 杜晓启, 杨校辉, 栗慧王君, . 挤密桩处理大厚度自重湿陷性黄土地区综合管廊地基及其工后浸水试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2914-2924.
[4]	安鹏，张爱军，邢义川，倪万魁，张博,. 伊犁深厚湿陷性黄土浸水入渗及沉降变形特征分析[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 557-564.
[5]	董林，王兰民，夏坤，袁晓铭,. 基于台湾集集地震数据的CPT与SPT液化判别方法比较[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3643-3648.
[6]	姚仰平，张北战. 基于体应变的强夯加固范围研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2663-2671.
[7]	文思强，李云鹏，马康. 强夯能量利用率反演及加固影响范围研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 185-192.
[8]	牛亚强，王旭，郑静，蒋代军，刘德仁，蒋鹏程 , . 侧向约束防渗路基新结构防渗效果试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 252-258.
[9]	黄雪峰，杨校辉，殷鹤，刘自龙，周俊鹏,. 湿陷性黄土场地湿陷下限深度与桩基中性点位置关系研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 296-302.
[10]	王威，王建华. 高能强夯下地基土体的变形特性[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 315-319.
[11]	梅源，胡长明，魏弋峰，张文萃，袁一力，王雪艳 , . Q2、Q3黄土深堑中高填方地基变形规律离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3473-3481.
[12]	王端端，周志军，吕彦达，魏进. 湿陷性黄土中成孔方式对桩基承载力影响试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2927-2933.
[13]	姚志华，黄雪峰 , 陈正汉，方祥位，苗强强，张江水，. 关于黄土湿陷性评价和剩余湿陷量的新认识[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 998-1006.
[14]	郑凌逶，周风华 , . 强夯置换软土中碎石墩形成过程的试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 90-97.
[15]	邵生俊，杨春鸣，马秀婷，陆斯. 黄土的独立物性指标及其与湿陷性参数的相关性分析[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 27-34.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed