›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 801-810.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

石碑塬滑坡黄土液化特征及其影响因素研究

张晓超1,黄润秋1,许 模1,裴向军1,韩祥森1,宋丽娟1,张帆宇2   

  1. 1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,成都 610059; 2. 兰州大学 土木工程与力学学院,兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2013-08-02 出版日期:2014-03-10 发布日期:2014-03-19
  • 作者简介:张晓超,女,1978年生,博士研究生,讲师,主要从事地质灾害防治方面的教学与科研工作
  • 基金资助:

    中国地调局项目(No.1212011140005);国家重点基础研究发展计划项目(No.2014CB744703)。

Loess liquefaction characteristics and its influential factors of Shibeiyuan landslide

ZHANG Xiao-chao1,HUANG Run-qiu1,XU Mo1,PEI Xiang-jun1,HAN Xiang-sen1, SONG Li-juan1,ZHANG Fan-yu2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection , Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610059, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
  • Received:2013-08-02 Online:2014-03-10 Published:2014-03-19

摘要: 石碑塬滑坡是1920年海原地震触发的大型黄土流滑,认识其破坏特征与发生机制对于黄土边坡长距离液化失稳机制的研究非常重要。对石碑塬黄土滑坡的调查和研究表明,饱和黄土或高含水率黄土具有很高的液化势和流态破坏势,在强震作用下,饱和黄土易发生液化或流滑。对石碑塬滑坡的7组原状黄土样品进行振动三轴剪切试验,并结合其微观特征分析,探讨了循环振动荷载作用下的饱和黄土孔隙水压力-应变增长模型,分析了振动液化过程中液化应力比与黄土粒度组成、土体微观结构参数及饱和度之间的关系。结果表明:黏粒含量越低,振动作用下饱和黄土孔隙水压力响应越快,液化应力比越低;黄土孔隙比越大,孔隙结构分形维数越大,液化应力比越低,振动液化后黄土孔隙分形维数降低,结构较液化之前更为致密;饱和度对黄土粒间胶结物质的赋存状态及黄土结构强度影响很大,同一土体饱和度越高,溶滤于孔隙水中的离子浓度越高,土体粒间接触点(或胶结点)越容易发生断裂,使得黄土结构强度降低,液化应力比降低。

关键词: 石碑塬黄土滑坡, 黄土液化特性, 微观结构, 液化应力比

Abstract: The Shibeiyuan landslide is a typically large loess flow slide which was triggered by Haiyuan earthquake in 1920. Understanding its behavior and mechanism is very important to study liquefied slope failures with long travel distance in the loess area. The in-situ investigation of the Shibeiyuan landslide shows that the saturated loess or the loess with high water content has high liquefaction and destructive potential which could cause liquefaction or flow slide under strong earthquake. The dynamic triaxial shear tests are performed on seven intact soil specimens taken from three places at the landslide. In addition, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) microscopic characteristics of the soil specimens are used to clarify the shear behaviors of these soil specimens. According to the results, the relation between water pore pressure and strain, as well as the relations between liquefied stress ratio and particle size, microstructure parameter, and degree of saturation are analyzed. The analytical results reveal that the liquefied stress ratio decreases and pore pressure response is stronger with the increasing of clay content. Meanwhile, the specimens with greater porosity have greater fractal dimension and less liquefied stress ratio. Moreover, the liquefied specimens are denser and its fractal dimension is greater compared to that before the liquefaction. Additionally, the degree of saturation has great influence on the state of interparticle cement and the microstructure in loess. The saturating process shows that the ionic concentration of the pore water is greater and the rupture of the interparticle contacts is easier when the degree of saturation becomes greater. As a result, the structural strength of the specimens decreases, leading to the decrease of the liquefaction stress ratio.

Key words: Shibeiyuan loess landslide, loess liquefaction characteristics, microstructure, liquefaction stress ratio

中图分类号: 

  • P 642.22
[1] 张善凯, 冷先伦, 盛谦, . 卢氏膨胀岩湿胀软化特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 561-570.
[2] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[3] 韩钢, 周辉, 陈建林, 张传庆, 高阳, 宋桂红, 洪望兵, . 白鹤滩水电站层间错动带工程地质特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3559-3568.
[4] 江强强, 刘路路, 焦玉勇, 王 浩, . 干湿循环下滑带土强度特性与微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1005-1012.
[5] 王登科, 孙刘涛, 魏建平, . 温度冲击下煤的微观结构变化与断裂机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 529-538.
[6] 李明玉, 孙文静. 黏土掺入生物炭后的持水特性及其影响机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4722-4730.
[7] 王东伟, 陆武萍, 唐朝生, 赵红崴, 李胜杰, 林銮, 冷挺, . 砂土微观结构样品制备技术及量化方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4783-4792.
[8] 张善凯, 冷先伦, 盛谦, 李彪, 周永强, . 卢氏膨胀岩在干湿循环作用下的胀缩特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4279-4288.
[9] 徐云山, 孙德安, 曾召田, 吕海波, . 膨润土热传导性能时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4324-4330.
[10] 付自国,乔登攀,郭忠林,李克钢,谢锦程,王佳信. 超细尾砂胶结充填体强度计算模型及应用[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3147-3156.
[11] 邓华锋,张恒宾,李建林,王晨玺杰,张吟钗,王 伟,胡亚运. 水-岩作用对砂岩卸荷力学特性及微观结构的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2344-2352.
[12] 王 鹏,许金余,方新宇,王佩玺,刘少赫,王浩宇,. 红砂岩吸水软化及冻融循环力学特性劣化[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2065-2072.
[13] 张亭亭,王 平,李江山,万 勇,薛 强,王士权, . 养护龄期和铅含量对磷酸镁水泥固化/稳定化铅污染土的固稳性能影响规律及微观机制[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2115-2123.
[14] 宋云奇,武朝军,叶冠林,. 上海浅部黏土渗透系数及其各向异性[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2139-2144.
[15] 乾增珍,盛明强,田开平,. 戈壁碎石土胶结作用机制及其微观力学模型研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 138-144.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 吴昌瑜,张 伟,李思慎,朱国胜. 减压井机械淤堵机制与防治方法试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3181 -3187 .
[2] 陈红江,李夕兵,刘爱华. 矿井突水水源判别的多组逐步Bayes判别方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3655 -3659 .
[3] 和法国,谌文武,韩文峰,张景科. 高分子材料SH固沙性能与微结构相关性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3803 -3807 .
[4] 雷永生. 西安地铁二号线下穿城墙及钟楼保护措施研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 223 -228 .
[5] 尚守平,岁小溪,周志锦,刘方成,熊 伟. 橡胶颗粒-砂混合物动剪切模量的试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 377 -381 .
[6] 肖 忠,王元战,及春宁,黄泰坤,单 旭. 波浪作用下加固软基上大圆筒结构稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2648 -2654 .
[7] 柴 波,殷坤龙,陈丽霞,李远耀. 岩体结构控制下的斜坡变形特征[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 521 -525 .
[8] 徐 扬,高 谦,李 欣,李俊华,贾云喜. 土石混合体渗透性现场试坑试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 855 -858 .
[9] 张 霆,刘汉龙,胡玉霞,STEWART Doug. 鼓式土工离心机技术及其工程应用研究[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1191 -1196 .
[10] 谭峰屹,邹志悝,邹荣华,林祖锴,郑德高. 换填黏性土料工程特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 154 -157 .