单一裂隙优势渗流对黏土层防渗性能的影响分析

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (10): 2838-2844.

单一裂隙优势渗流对黏土层防渗性能的影响分析

蔡武军^{1, 2}，凌道盛^{1, 2}，徐泽龙^{1, 2}，陈云敏^{1, 2}

1. 浙江大学软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室，杭州 310058；2. 浙江大学岩土工程研究所，杭州 310058

收稿日期:2013-07-01 出版日期:2014-10-11 发布日期:2014-10-27
通讯作者: 凌道盛，男，1968年生，教授，博士生导师，主要从事土动力学、计算土力学方面的研究工作。E-mail: dsling@zju.edu.cn E-mail: cwj7017@163.com
作者简介:蔡武军，男，1988年生，硕士研究生，主要从事土体开裂和渗流方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家重点基金研究发展计划(973计划)项目(No. 2012CB719805)。

Influence of preferential flow induced by a single crack on anti-seepage performance of clay barrier

CAI Wu-jun^{1, 2}，LING Dao-sheng^{1, 2}，XU Ze-long^{1, 2}，CHEN Yun-min^{1, 2}

1. Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering of Ministry of Education, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China

Received:2013-07-01 Online:2014-10-11 Published:2014-10-27

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 垃圾填埋体不均匀沉降等容易引起压实黏土防渗层开裂，显著降低其防渗性能。将裂隙作为高渗透性的多孔介质材料，建立了含单一裂隙压实黏土层的饱和/非饱和渗流模型，数值研究了含裂隙黏土层中的优势渗流过程，对比分析了裂隙位置、深度、宽度和渗透系数对压实黏土层水分击穿时间和稳定渗漏量的影响。结果表明，含裂隙压实黏土层的渗流过程可分为3个阶段：初始阶段、击穿阶段和稳定阶段；底部裂隙对压实黏土层防渗性能的影响较小，而顶部裂隙和贯通裂隙的影响较大；水分击穿时间随裂隙深度增大而迅速缩短，为保证黏土层防渗性能，宜将裂隙深度控制在0.1倍土层厚度以内；水分击穿时间和稳定渗漏量随裂隙宽度、渗透系数的增大而分别缩短和增加，且当其达到一定值后逐渐趋于稳定；裂隙贯通后将显著降低压实黏土层的防渗性能，其稳定渗漏量随裂隙宽度和渗透系数的增大而呈线性增长。

关键词: 垃圾填埋体, 压实黏土层, 裂隙, 优势渗流, 水分击穿时间

Abstract: The waterproofing properties of compacted clay barrier at landfill site will be greatly weakened by crack which is induced by the waste’s differential settlement. In order to reveal the effects of preferential flow on the anti-seepage performance of cracked barrier, the crack is treated as high-permeable porous medium, and a simplified saturated/unsaturated seepage model of the barrier with a single crack is developed to study the process of preferential flow. In addition, the influence of crack position, depth, width and permeability coefficient on the anti-seepage performance of the barrier is comparatively analyzed. The results show that the infiltration process can be divided into three stages: early stage, penetrating stage and steady stage. Besides, the bottom crack has little influence on the barrier’s anti-seepage performance, but it is greatly affected by upper or fully penetrated crack. The breakthrough time will be significantly shortened with crack depth increasing until the crack is thoroughly penetrated; and it is better to keep the crack depth under 0.1 time of the barrier’s thickness to ensure its anti-seepage performance. What’s more, with the increase of crack width and permeability coefficient, the water breakthrough time will be rapidly shortened and the steady leakage will increase respectively; and they tend to be stable when they are reaching a certain value. It also shows that the barrier’s anti-seepage performance would significantly deteriorate as soon as the crack is fully penetrated; and the steady leakage will increase linearly with the increase of crack width and permeability coefficient.

Key words: MSW landfills, compacted clay barrier, crack, preferential flow, water breakthrough time

中图分类号:

TU 43

蔡武军，凌道盛，徐泽龙，陈云敏 , . 单一裂隙优势渗流对黏土层防渗性能的影响分析[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2838-2844.

CAI Wu-jun ，LING Dao-sheng ，XU Ze-long ，CHEN Yun-min , . Influence of preferential flow induced by a single crack on anti-seepage performance of clay barrier [J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2838-2844.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	肖瑶, 邓华锋, 李建林, 支永艳, 熊雨. 长期浸泡作用下灌浆加固裂隙岩体劣化效应[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 143-151.
[2]	翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[3]	支永艳, 邓华锋, 肖瑶, 段玲玲, 蔡佳, 李建林. 微生物灌浆加固裂隙岩体的渗流特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 237-244.
[4]	吴美苏, 周成, 王林, 谭昌明, . 根系和裂隙对土体水力和力学特性影响数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 519-526.
[5]	赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[6]	陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 李翻翻, 马永尚, 闫宪洋, . 黏土岩饱和过程中水分运移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3327-3334.
[7]	李博, 黄嘉伦, 钟振, 邹良超, . 三维交叉裂隙渗流传质特性数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3670-3768.
[8]	王鹏飞, 谭文辉, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 不同粗糙度和隙宽贯通充填裂隙渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3062-3070.
[9]	张天军, 庞明坤, 蒋兴科, 彭文清, 纪翔, . 负压对抽采钻孔孔周煤体瓦斯渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2517-2524.
[10]	王辰霖, 张小东, 杜志刚, . 循环加卸载作用下预制裂隙煤样渗透性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2140-2153.
[11]	张波, 李垚, 杨学英, 朱飘扬, 朱春帝, 刘子豪, 刘文杰, 罗志恒, . 一种用于水压致裂试验的水压供给装置研制及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 2022-2028.
[12]	魏久传, 韩承豪, 张伟杰, 谢超, 张连震, 李孝朋, 张春瑞, 蒋记港, . 基于步进式算法的裂隙注浆扩散机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 913-925.
[13]	尹乾, 靖洪文, 刘日成, 苏海健, 蔚立元, 王迎超. 不同侧压力系数下裂隙网络岩体非线性渗流特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 592-600.
[14]	李崴, 王者超, 毕丽平, 刘杰, . 辐射流条件下裂隙岩体渗透性表征单元体尺寸与等效渗透系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 720-727.
[15]	郑安兴, 罗先启, 陈振华, . 基于扩展有限元法的岩体水力劈裂耦合模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 799-808.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed