›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (S2): 665-672.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.S2.084

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑土体应变软化特性的滑坡抗滑桩设计推力研究

范志强,唐辉明,汪丁建,刘 凯,温 韬   

  1. 中国地质大学(武汉)工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2016-05-06 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 唐辉明,男,1962年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事工程地质模拟和地质灾害防治研究。E-mail:tanghm@cug.edu.cn E-mail:zqfan9235@foxmail.com
  • 作者简介:范志强,男,1992年生,硕士,主要从事工程地质和岩土工程方面的学习和研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 41230637);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)项目(No. 2011CB710606)

A method for designed thrust of anti-slide pile considering strain softening properties of soil

FAN Zhi-qiang, TANG Hui-ming, WANG Ding-jian, LIU Kai, WANG Ding-jian, WEN Tao   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2016-05-06 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Program of National Science Foundation of China (41230637) and Project supported by the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2011CB710606).

摘要: 传统剩余推力方法的基本假设仅适用于理想塑性材料或应变硬化材料,对具有应变软化特性的坡体其适用性受到限制。基于土体的应变软化性质,探讨了其剪应变和抗剪能力的对应关系。通过引入条块底部的应变协调方程,对滑坡条块推力计算方法进行改进,提出了考虑应变软化特性的滑坡抗滑桩设计推力计算新方法。实例分析表明,改进的方法计算得到的滑坡当前稳定性系数介于分别取峰值强度和残余强度所获的结果之间;所得的抗滑桩设计推力值相较残余强度算得的值小,较峰值强度算得的值大,介于两者之间;能考虑土体应变软化特性的设计推力计算是依据滑坡当前状态进行,既能够起到及时遏制滑坡进一步发展的作用,又比较符合坡体实际情况。

关键词: 剩余推力, 应变软化, 应变折减系数, 剪应变, 抗滑桩推力

Abstract: The basic hypothesis of residual thrust method is only suitable for perfect-plastic materials or strain-hardening materials. For the slope with strain softening properties, the applicability of this method will be limited. This paper based on the strain softening properties of soil aims to explore the relationship between shear strain and the shear capacity, by introducing equations of strain compatibility at the bottom of the bars, the method for landslide thrust calculation is improved; and then a new method for calculating designed thrust of anti-slide pile considering strain softening properties is proposed. The case studies show that the coefficient of landslide stability calculated by improved calculation method is between the values respectively computed on the condition of peak strength and residual strength; and the designed thrust of anti-slide pile obtained by improved method is much lower than that obtained by residual strength, but is higher than that obtained by peak strength, is between the two sides all the same. The method proposed is based on the current status of the landslide; so it can curb the further development of the landslide and also conform to the actual situation of the slope at present.

Key words: residual thrust, strain softening, strain-dependent coefficient, shear strain, thrust of anti-slide pile

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[2] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[3] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[4] 张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[5] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[6] 赵丁凤, 梁 珂, 陈国兴, 熊 浩, 周正龙, . 剪切-体积应变耦合的孔压增量模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1832-1840.
[7] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 雷 涛, 刘 琪, 王智猛, 刘 勇, . 考虑填土强度的加筋土挡墙动位移计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[8] 王凤云, 钱德玲, . 基于统一强度理论深埋圆形隧道围岩的剪胀分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[9] 王 腾, 吴 瑞. 黏土中海底管线竖向贯入阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 871-878.
[10] 张龙飞, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 康田. 推移式缓倾浅层滑坡渐进破坏力学模型 与稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4767-4776.
[11] 唐洪祥, 韦文成. 耦合强度各向异性与应变软化的边坡稳定 有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4092-4100.
[12] 王凤云,钱德玲. 基于切向应变软化的深埋圆形隧道围岩弹塑性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3313-3320.
[13] 王 振,叶晓明,刘永新,. 考虑滑坡渐进破坏的改进简布条分法[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 675-682.
[14] 周恩全, 朱晓冬, 陆建飞, 王炳辉, . 液化后砂土流体特性测试装置的研发及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4698-4706.
[15] 邓 琴,汤 华,王东英,秦雨樵,吴振君,. 基于应变软化的多阶边坡稳定分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4109-4116.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!