›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (11): 3156-3164.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.11.015

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强降雨条件下基岩型层状边坡入渗模型及稳定性研究

覃小华1, 2,刘东升3,宋强辉1, 2,王 旭1, 2,吴润泽1, 2,辛建平1, 2   

  1. 1.后勤工程学院 军事土木工程系,重庆 401311;2.后勤工程学院 岩土力学与地质环境保护重庆市重点实验室,重庆 401311; 3.重庆市地质矿产勘查开发局,重庆 400071
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-19 出版日期:2016-11-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 刘东升,男,1962年生,博士,博导,总工程师,主要从事边坡工程可靠度分析和地质环境风险评估研究。E-mail:dshliu@vip.sina.com E-mail:673124692@qq.com
  • 作者简介:覃小华,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事非饱和土及边坡工程分析方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51408603);重庆市基础与前沿研究一般项目(No. cstc2013jcyjA00010, No. cstc2014jcyjA30014)

Infiltration model of bedrock laminar slope under heavy rainfall and its stability analysis

QIN Xiao-hua1, 2, LIU Dong-sheng3, SONG Qiang-hui1, 2, WANG Xu1, 2, WU Run-ze1, 2, XIN Jian-ping1, 2   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Logistical Engineering University, Chongqing 401311, China; 2. Chongqing Key Laboratory of Geomechanics & Geoenvironmental Protection, Logistical Engineering University, Chongqing 401311, China; 3. Chongqing Bureau of Geology and Minerals Exploration, Chongqing 400071, China
  • Received:2016-04-19 Online:2016-11-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51408603) and Chongqing Research Program of Basic Research and Frontier Technology(cstc2013jcyjA00010 and cstc2014jcyjA30014).

摘要: 强降雨作用下基岩型层状边坡易发生失稳破坏,给人们生命财产造成重大损失。为探索基岩型层状边坡的降雨入渗过程,以Green-Ampt入渗模型为基础,考虑了边坡几何特征及饱和带渗流作用,得到了边坡不同入渗阶段入渗率和湿润峰深度的计算式,建立了适用于基岩型层状边坡的降雨入渗计算模型;在分析基岩型层状边坡稳定性时,考虑了饱和带的渗流作用,联合降雨入渗模型与极限平衡法,分析了基岩面与湿润峰面稳定性的变化规律,得到了计算基岩型层状边坡安全系数的解析表达式;结果表明,该模型的计算与试验结果具有一致性。利用该计算模型与传统计算方法对张家湾滑坡进行了强度为30 mm/h的降雨入渗与稳定性分析,得到了不同计算方法下张家湾滑坡湿润峰深度及安全系数随降雨历时增加而发生的变化规律,结果表明该计算模型在分析基岩型层状边坡稳定性时优于传统分析方法。

关键词: 强降雨, 层状边坡, 降雨入渗, 湿润峰, 稳定性, 安全系数

Abstract: The failure of bedrock laminar slope mostly happens due to heavy rainfall; and it causes huge losses to people’s lives and property. To explore the process of rainfall infiltration into bedrock laminar slope under heavy rainfall, a new rainfall infiltration model for this slope is built and then a formula of calculating infiltration rate and wetting front depth about slope is obtained for different stages based on Green-Ampt infiltration model. The geometric characteristics of slope and the seepage of saturation zone are considered in this new model. Based on the rainfall infiltration model and limit equilibrium method, an analytical expression of safety factor is developed for bedrock laminar slope under different rainfall durations by considering the seepage of saturation zone. The expression is used to analyze the variation of the surface of bedrock and the surface of wetting front. It is shown that the calculated results have a high consistency with that of slope model test. Moreover, the proposed procedure and the traditional method are employed to analyze the process of rainfall infiltration and the regularity of stability of Zhangjiawan landslide under the rainfall intensity of 30 mm/h. The variations of wetting front depth and safety factors with the increase of rainfall duration are obtained. The results show that, the proposed procedure is superior to traditional method in analyzing the stability of bedrock laminar slope.

Key words: heavy rainfall, laminar slope, rainfall infiltration, wetting front, stability, safety factor

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411

[1] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[2] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[3] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[4] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[5] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[6] 朱彦鹏, 严紫豪, 朱轶凡. 微型钢管砂浆复合桩在土体中稳定性计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1339-1346.
[7] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[8] 毕宗琦, 宫全美, 周顺华, 程茜, . 循环荷载下竖向土拱演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 886-894.
[9] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[10] 刘一扬, 宋选民, 朱德福, 李竹. 大块度关键块动态结构力学行为及响应特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1019-1028.
[11] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[12] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[13] 刘丽, 吴羊, 陈立宏, 刘建坤, . 基于数值模拟的湿润锋前进法测量精度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 341-349.
[14] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[15] 聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!