›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 124-132.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.01.016

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

围岩-锚固体流变控制机制及支护最优化设计

罗生虎1, 2,伍永平2, 3,张嘉凡1, 2   

  1. 1. 西安科技大学 理学院,陕西 西安 710054;2. 西安科技大学 西部矿井开采及灾害防治教育部重点实验室,陕西 西安 710054; 3. 西安科技大学 能源学院,陕西 西安 710054
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-07 出版日期:2017-01-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 伍永平,男,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事采矿工程、安全技术及工程方面的研究工作。E-mail: wuyp@xust.edu.cn E-mail:luoshh06@qq.com
  • 作者简介:罗生虎,男,1983年生,博士,讲师,主要从事岩层控制方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重点项目(No. 51634007);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51204132);国家自然科学基金青年项目(No. 51204132)

Rheology control mechanism of surrounding rock mass and anchorage body and its support design optimization

LUO Sheng-hu1, 2, WU Yong-ping2, 3, ZHANG Jia-fan1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Sciences, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Western Mine Exploitation and Hazard Prevention of Ministry of Education, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 3. School of Energy Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • Received:2015-01-07 Online:2017-01-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Key Program of the Natural Science Foundation of China (51634007), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51374168) and the Young Foundation of the National Natural Science of China (51204132).

摘要: 针对巷道围岩的流变特性及其控制理论,通过黏弹性理论和非线性最优化原理,在考虑开挖面空间效应的基础上,研究围岩-锚固体的耦合作用机制,并建立巷道支护最优化设计模型。通过算例分析了支护时间、锚固体厚度、巷道半径以及原岩应力对围岩-锚固体流变特性和巷道支护最优化设计的影响。结果显示,支护时间、锚固体厚度、巷道半径以及原岩应力都与巷道围岩的稳定性有着密切的联系。巷道位移随着支护时间的增长、锚固体厚度的减小、巷道半径和原岩应力的增大而增大;当锚固体受力处于临界状态时,锚固体厚度随着支护时间的增大而减小,且当锚固体厚度较小时,锚固体厚度与支护时间近似呈线性关系。

关键词: 围岩, 黏弹性, 耦合, 最优化

Abstract: The aim of this paper is to improve the control theory for the rheological behavior of the surrounding rock around roadway. Based on the theory of viscoelasticity and nonlinear optimization principle, a time-dependent viscoelastic model of coupling action between the surrounding rock mass and the anchorage body is developed considering the space effect of tunnel face advancement; and then an optimization model of roadway support is established. The influences of the support time, the thickness of anchor, the original rock stress and the road radius on the deformation of surrounding rock mass are analyzed; and then the optimal design parameters of the roadway support are discussed in detail by a case study. The results show that the support time, the thickness of anchorage body, the original rock stress and the road radius have certain impacts on the stability of tunnel. With the increases of the roadway support time, the original rock stress and the road radius, and the decrease of the thickness of the anchor body, the displacement increases. The optimal design parameters of the roadway support are obtained; when the force acted on the support body reaches a critical state, the thickness of anchorage body decreases with the support time elapsing, and when the thickness of anchorage body is smaller, they show an approximately linear relationship with time.

Key words: surrounding rock mass, viscoelasticity, coupling, optimization

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470

[1] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
[2] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[3] 孙曦源, 衡朝阳, 周智, 张剑涛. 某超浅埋过街通道围岩压力的极限平衡求解方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 312-318.
[4] 姚玉文, 刘方成, 补国斌, 景立平, . 橡胶砂弹性动力学参数的弯曲-伸缩元试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2369-2379.
[5] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[6] 白雪元, 王学滨, 舒芹, . 静水压力下内摩擦角对圆形洞室围岩局部破裂 影响的连续-非连续模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2485-2493.
[7] 潘锐, 程桦, 王雷, 王凤云, 蔡毅, 曹广勇, 张朋, 张皓杰, . 巷道浅层破碎围岩锚注加固承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1887-1898.
[8] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广, . 浅埋隧道冻结法施工地表冻胀融沉规律及冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2110-2121.
[9] 孙德安, 薛垚, 汪磊, . 变荷载作用下考虑半透水边界热传导性的 一维饱和土热固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1465-1473.
[10] 徐毅青, 邓绍玉, 葛琦. 锚索预应力初期与长期损失的预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[11] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[12] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[13] 吴鑫林, 张晓平, 刘泉声, 李伟伟, 黄继敏. TBM岩体可掘性预测及其分级研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1721-1729.
[14] 胡田飞, 王天亮, 常键, 刘建勇, 卢玉婷, . 基于有限体积法的冻土水热耦合程序开发及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1781-1789.
[15] 刘媛, 马祥华, 刘洋, 肖飞, 陈玉海. 干耦合超声波检测及波初至的自动拾取[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1455-1464.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!