›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (2): 453-461.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.02.019

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

膨胀土原位孔内剪切试验与强度响应特征

李晶晶1, 2,孔令伟1, 2,穆 坤1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-06 出版日期:2017-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术研究。E-mail: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail: smilinglee@hotmail.com
  • 作者简介:李晶晶,女,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与边坡工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金重点项目(No.41430634)

In-situ borehole shear test on expansive soil and its strength characteristics

LI Jing-jing1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, 2, MU Kun1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2016-06-06 Online:2017-02-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the Key Program of National Nature Science Foundation of China (41430634).

摘要: 针对膨胀土堑坡防护工程中不同的施工工序和降水入渗诱发灾害频发现象,基于原位孔内剪切试验,通过施加不同法向应力水平,以及成孔后注水浸泡等工况下的现场剪切试验,获得南阳某堑坡膨胀土强度特性随荷载施加方式与浸水条件的变化规律。结果表明:膨胀土孔内剪切试验所得的剪应力-剪切位移曲线总体上呈现弱硬化变形特征;浸水对抗剪强度影响很大,最大降幅达56.9%,主要表现为黏聚力的降低,最大值达18.1 kPa。预加载荷对浸水软化效应具有一定抑制作用,但当预加载荷超过某一应力水平时,难以发挥更大的抑制效果。黏聚力与预加载荷呈线性正相关;内摩擦角与预加载荷呈线性负相关,但降幅甚微。在实际工程中,膨胀土边坡稳定性分析应考虑降雨入渗对强度参数的影响,同时充分利用抗剪强度参数和预加载荷的线性关系,可根据工程要求达到的安全系数反推出所需的预加载荷大小,从而指导实际工程施工。该研究可为膨胀土工程场地评价、参数选取与灾害评价提供技术依据和参考。

关键词: 孔内剪切试验, 膨胀土, 抗剪强度, 荷载施加方式, 浸水

Abstract: To study the impact of different construction procedures for cut slope protection of expansive soils and to prevent disasters triggered by rainfall infiltration, in-situ borehole shear tests (BST) were conducted under different normal stress levels and soaking conditions. Strength characteristics of expansive soils cut slope in Nanyang were obtained with various loading paths and soaking conditions. Results show that the relationship between shear stress and displacement from BST presents weak hardening as the shear strain increases. A max drop of 56.9% in shear strength, and a decrease of 18.1 kPa in cohesion are observed. Preloading inhibits softening but fails when it increases to some threshold. The cohesion has a positive linear relationship with the preloading stress, while the internal friction angle has a negative linear relationship with the preloading stress, but internal friction angle rarely varies. In engineering practices, effect of rainfall infiltration on strength parameters should be considered. Meanwhile, the linear relationship between parameters of shear strength and preloading stress should be used to back-calculate the preloading needed according to the safety factor that the project should satisfy. The study results provide technical reference for site evaluation, parameters selection and disaster assessment of the similar sites of expansive soils.

Key words: borehole shear test, expansive soil, shear strength, loading added way, soaking

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443

[1] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[2] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[3] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[4] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[5] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[6] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[7] 刘建民, 邱月, 郭婷婷, 宋文智, 谷川, . 饱和粉质黏土静剪强度与振动后 静剪强度对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 773-780.
[8] 涂园, 王奎华, 周建, 胡安峰, . 有效应力法和有效固结压力法在预压地基 强度计算中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 645-654.
[9] 李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[10] 张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[11] 王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[12] 谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[13] 刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[14] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[15] 陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!