›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 4261-4268.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0352

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同刚度约束对能量桩应力和位移的影响研究

王成龙1, 2,刘汉龙1, 2, 3,孔纲强3,吴宏伟4,李建斌1, 2   

  1. 1. 重庆大学 土木工程学院,重庆 400045;2. 重庆大学 山地城镇建设与新技术教育部重点试验室,重庆 400045; 3. 河海大学 土木与交通学院,江苏 南京 210098;4. 香港科技大学 土木与环境工程系,香港
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-03 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 作者简介:王成龙,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事能量桩桩-土相互作用方面的科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市科协“科技新星培育工程”项目(No. KJXX2017005);高等学校学科创新引智(111)计划项目(No. B13024)。

Study on stress and displacement of energy pile influenced by pile tip stiffness

WANG Cheng-long1, 2, LIU Han-long1, 2, 3, KONG Gang-qiang3, NG C W W4, LI Jian-bin1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045; 3. College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 4. Department of Civil Engineering, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong, China
  • Received:2017-03-03 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Chongqing Scientific & Technological Talents Program (KJXX2017005) and the Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (B13024).

摘要: 能量桩是一种在传递上部建筑荷载的同时获取地热能源的新技术,其实际工作过程中,热荷载会引起桩体的膨胀或收缩,而桩顶建筑和桩底持力层则会对桩体变形产生约束,进一步影响桩体的应力和位移,但是目前对该问题的研究却十分有限。基于模型试验和数值模拟方法,对桩顶和桩底不同约束条件下两种埋管形式(单U和W型)的桩体位移和热应力进行了分析,并进一步探讨了位移零点随桩顶和桩底约束条件的变化规律。研究结果表明,随着桩顶上部荷载约束刚度的增大,桩体位移零点上移,桩体热应力随着深度增大而减小;随着桩端土体约束刚度的增大,桩体位移零点下移,桩体热应力随着深度增大而增大;相较于无外荷载,工作荷载作用下位移零点上移。

关键词: 桩基, 能量桩, 热力学特性, 模型试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: Energy pile is an innovate technology which can simultaneously support building load and acquire geothermal energy. In the practical use, expansion or contraction of the piles induced by thermal load will be restrained by the upper structure and bearing layer of pile bottom. Thus, the pile stress and displacement will be significantly influenced. However, there are only few studies focusing on this issue. Based on model test and numerical simulation methods, the thermal stress and displacement of two types of heat exchange piles (U-shaped and W-shaped) under different pile head and pile tip restraints were analyzed. Furthermore, the position of null point influenced by the pile head stiffness restraint and pile tip soil stiffness restraint were evaluated. The results show that as the pile head load stiffness restraint increased, the null point moved upwards, and the thermal stress decreased with the increasing of depth. As the pile tip soil stiffness restraint increased, the null point moved downwards, and the thermal stress increased with the increasing of depth. Compared with the case with no load, the null point will move upward with a working load.

Key words: foundation, energy pile, thermo-mechanical behavior, model test, numerical simulations

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 李任融, 孔纲强, 杨庆, 孙广超. 流速对桩−筏基础中能量桩换热效率 与热力耦合特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 264-270.
[3] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[4] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[5] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[6] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[7] 刘争宏, 张龙, 郑建国, 张炜, 于永堂, . 滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2504-2515.
[8] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[9] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[10] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[11] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[12] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[13] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[14] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[15] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!