岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 2264-2274.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0372

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

柔性侧限条件下软土的变形特性及固结模型

罗庆姿1,陈晓平2,袁炳祥1,冯德銮1   

  1. 1. 广东工业大学 土木与交通工程学院,广东 广州 510006;2. 暨南大学 理工学院,广东 广州 510632
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-30 出版日期:2019-06-11 发布日期:2019-06-22
  • 通讯作者: 袁炳祥,男,1983年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土工试验及桩基理论的科研工作。E-mail: yuanbx@gdut.edu.cn E-mail: luoluo1986220@163.com
  • 作者简介:罗庆姿,女,1986年生,博士,讲师,主要从事土工试验及软土沉降等方面的教学和科研工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41472279,No.51809050);广东省自然科学基金?博士启动(No.2016A030310345)。

Deformation behavior and consolidation model of soft soil under flexible lateral constraint

LUO Qing-zi 1, CHEN Xiao-ping2, YUAN Bing-xiang1, FENG De-luan1   

  1. 1. School of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510006, China; 2. College of Science and Engineering, Jinan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510632, China
  • Received:2018-05-30 Online:2019-06-11 Published:2019-06-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41472279, 51809050) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (for Doctors) (2016A030310345).

摘要: 软黏土具有含水率高、压缩性强、泊松比大的物理特性。对于深厚软黏土地基而言,在竖向荷载的作用下很难保证侧向变形为0,适当考虑侧向变形的柔性约束条件可能更符合工程实际。因此,提出了柔性侧限条件下的竖向固结试验方法,对原状土样及重塑土样分别进行了不同侧向约束条件下的竖向固结对比试验,分析了侧限条件对软黏土沉降特征及变形参数的影响。试验成果表明,柔性侧限条件下土体的主固结变形量、次固结变形量均较K0侧限条件下的大,主固结完成时间较短,且等时曲线非线性化程度更高。基于试验成果及ε-lgp曲线,引入非达西渗流理论,对一维Terzaghi经典固结理论进行修正,建立了柔性侧限约束条件下的非线性控制方程,此计算模型参数通过柔性侧限固结试验获取,可计算一定侧向变形条件下土体的变形特性,通过对室内试验成果的模拟验证了模型的有效性。

关键词: 软黏土, 柔性侧限, 固结试验, ε-lgp曲线, 非线性模型

Abstract: Soft clay is characterized by high water content, large compressibility and Poisson's ratio. For thick soft soil foundation, it is difficult to ensure that the lateral deformation remains zero under vertical loading. The condition of flexible constraints with proper consideration of lateral deformation is more realistic with engineering practices. Therefore, in this paper, a consolidation test with flexible lateral constraints was conducted on the undisturbed and remodeled soils. The influences of the lateral constraints on the settlement characteristics and deformation parameters of soft clay were investigated. The results show that both the primary and secondary consolidation deformations of the soil under flexible constraints are greater than those under the K0 lateral confining conditions, as well as performing a shorter consolidation time and more nonlinear isochronous curves. The theory of non-Darcy flow was introduced to modify the Terzaghi’s consolidation theory, so that nonlinear governing equations considering the certain lateral deformation effect were deduced. Furthermore, the parameters of the calculated model were obtained from the flexible lateral restraints consolidation tests. Finally, the validity of the proposed model was verified by the laboratory test results.

Key words: soft clay, flexible geometric confined, consolidation test, ε-lgp curve, non-linear model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 447
[1] 王钰轲, 万永帅, 方宏远, 曾长女, 石明生, 吴迪, . 圆形应力路径下软黏土的动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1643-1652.
[2] 任连伟, 曹辉, 孔纲强. 试剂注入配合比对化学电渗法处治软黏土 加固效应对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1219-1226.
[3] 任宇晓, 闫玥, 付登锋. 浅层地基上管道轴向运动的阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1404-1411.
[4] 孙红, 宋春雨, 滕慕薇, 葛修润. 加荷条件下软黏土的孔隙演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 141-146.
[5] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[6] 夏唐代, 郑晴晴, 陈秀良, . 基于累积动应力水平的间歇加载下超孔压预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1483-1490.
[7] 冯凌云, 朱斌, 代加林, 孔德琼, . 深海管道水平向管−土相互作用 大变形连续极限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4907-4915.
[8] 雷华阳, 刘广学, 周 骏, . 吹填场区双层软黏土地基承载特性及破坏模式[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 260-268.
[9] 时 刚,刘忠玉,李永辉. 循环荷载作用下考虑非达西渗流的软黏土一维流变固结分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 521-528.
[10] 程星磊,王建华,王哲学,. 软黏土中吸力锚循环失稳过程的模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3285-3293.
[11] 闫澍旺,张京京,田英辉,陈 浩,. 等向固结饱和黏土卸载孔压特性的试验与理论研究[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 775-781.
[12] 胡秀青,张 艳,符洪涛,陈 琳,罗 盼,聂 勇, 王 军, . 水平双向荷载耦合对饱和软黏土动力特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 839-847.
[13] 宋林辉,王宇豪,付 磊,梅国雄,. 软黏土中地下结构浮力测试试验与分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 753-758.
[14] 陈 波,孙德安,高 游,李 健,. 上海软黏土的孔径分布试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2523-2530.
[15] 高彦斌,张松波,葛潇楠,. 我国沿海地区软黏土压缩指数统计及与国外其他地区对比[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2713-2720.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!