岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (7): 2593-2607.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0598

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水平荷载下桩身侧阻抗力矩的作用机制 与计算模型研究

竺明星1, 2, 3,戴国亮1, 2,龚维明1, 2,万志辉1, 2,卢红前3   

  1. 1. 东南大学 混凝土及预应力混凝土教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 211189;2. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 211189; 3. 中国能源建设集团江苏省电力设计院有限公司,江苏 南京 211102
  • 收稿日期:2018-03-31 出版日期:2019-07-11 发布日期:2019-07-19
  • 作者简介:竺明星,男,1985年生,博士(后),副研究员,主要从事桩基工程理论及海上风机基础科研工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51808112,No. 51878160);江苏省基础研究计划(自然科学基金)资助项目(No. BK20180155)。

Mechanism and calculation models of resisting moment caused by shaft resistance for laterally loaded pile

ZHU Ming-xing1, 2, 3, DAI Guo-liang1, 2, GONG Wei-ming1, 2, WAN Zhi-hui1, 2, LU Hong-qian3   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory for RC and PRC Structure, Ministry of Education, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211189, China; 3. Jiangsu Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Energy Engineering Group, Nanjing, Jiangsu 211102, China
  • Received:2018-03-31 Online:2019-07-11 Published:2019-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51808112, 51878160) and the Natural Fund Project of Jiangsu Basic Research Program (BK20180155).

摘要: 为探讨摩阻力增强效应影响下的水平受荷桩承载机制,建立了水平荷载作用下考虑增强效应影响的桩侧摩阻力?-s曲线模型,并在此基础上推导了桩身单位长度侧阻抗力矩数值解。随后开展了桩径、临界位移、极限侧摩阻力等因素影响下Ms,ini /Msu,ini-? /? ref,ini无量纲化曲线规律分析。结合摩阻力增强效应理论进而分别建立了线弹性-塑性、双曲线、API规范砂土与黏土? -s曲线模型作用下的桩身侧阻抗力矩简化理论解,并基于传递矩阵法原理,解得了考虑桩侧摩阻力作用时基桩水平承载力半解析解。通过多组验证工况和工程实例分析验证了所建立的侧阻抗力矩简化解以及考虑侧阻抗力矩影响的基桩水平承载力方法的正确性,同时也证明了摩阻力增强效应对基桩水平承载力的影响不能忽略,并得出如下结论:无试验数据参考时,砂土、黏土与桩接触面的刚度指数可分别取0.725和0.600;桩身侧阻抗力矩随着桩径、极限摩阻力的增加以及临界位移的减小而增加,其中桩径对侧阻抗力矩影响更为明显。

关键词: 桩基, 水平荷载, 抗力矩, 侧摩阻力增强效应, 传递矩阵法

Abstract: To examine the influence of strengthening effect of skin resistance on the bearing mechanism of laterally loaded pile, this study firstly established τ-s curve models with consideration of strengthening effect under horizontal loading. Then its numerical solution for resisting moment per unit length caused by vertical shaft resistance was obtained. This work performed the analysis on normalized curves with form of Ms,ini /Msu,ini-θ/θref,ini under the influence factors including pile diameter, critical displacement and limit shaft resistance. Accordingly, based on the theory of strengthening effect of skin resistance, this paper deduced simplified theoretical solutions of resisting moment for τ-s curves with linear elastoplastic type, hyperbolic type, clay and sand type of API Code, respectively. Moreover, combined with the principle of transfer matrix method, this work obtained the semi-analytical solutions for laterally loaded pile considering resisting moment effect. The results from proposed calculation models compare well with validation cases, which verify the reliability of simplified solution of side friction caused resisting moment and of proposed pile responses considering resisting moment effect. The comparisons also indicate that the influence of strengthening effect of skin resistance on bearing capacity of laterally loaded pile is non-negligible. Finally, the results reveal that in case of no test data for reference, the recommend values of rigidity indexes for interfaces of sand-pile and clay-pile could be 0.725 and 0.600, respectively. This resisting moment effect will increase as pile diameter, ultimate shaft resistance increases or increase as critical displacement decreases, while pile diameter has more notable influence.

Key words: pile foundation, lateral loading, resisting moment, strengthen effect of shaft resistance, transfer matrix method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[2] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[3] 刘争宏, 张龙, 郑建国, 张炜, 于永堂, . 滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2504-2515.
[4] 邓涛, 林聪煜, 柳志鹏, 黄明, 陈文菁, . 大位移条件下水平受荷单桩的简明弹塑性计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 95-102.
[5] 方金城, 孔纲强, 陈斌, 车平, 彭怀风, 吕志祥, . 混凝土水化作用对群桩热力学特性影响现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2997-3003.
[6] 高广运, 谢伟, 陈娟, 赵宏, . 高铁运行引起的高架桥群桩基础地面振动衰减分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3197-3206.
[7] 穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘 旸, 刘 泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[8] 吴小锋, 朱斌, 汪玉冰, . 水平环境荷载与地震动联合作用下的海上风机 单桩基础动力响应模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3937-3944.
[9] 郑俊杰, 吕思祺, 曹文昭, 景 丹, . 高填方膨胀土作用下刚柔复合桩基 挡墙结构数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
[10] 张 骁, 肖军华, 农兴中, 郭佳奇, 吴 楠, . 基于HS-Small模型的基坑近接桥桩开挖 变形影响区研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 263-273.
[11] 赵明华,陈耀浩,杨超炜,肖 尧. 基于有限杆单元法的陡坡基桩非线性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3020-3028.
[12] 喻豪俊,彭社琴,赵其华,. 碎石土斜坡水平受荷桩承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2537-2545.
[13] 熊 辉,江雅丰,禹荣霞. 层状地基中基于Laplace变换的桩基横向振动阻抗计算[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1901-1907.
[14] 刘红军,杨 奇,. 局部冲刷对风机支撑系统承载性能的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 722-727.
[15] 赵明华,朱志仁,黄明华,杨超炜,徐卓君. 考虑基桩嵌岩段侧阻的岩溶区顶板安全厚度计算[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4201-4209.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!