岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 477-485.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2083

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟

韩征1,粟滨1,李艳鸽1,王伟2,王卫东1, 3,黄健陵1,陈光齐4   

  1. 1. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075;2. 中国地质大学 环境学院,湖北 武汉430074; 3. 中南大学 重载铁路工程结构教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410075;4. 九州大学 工学府,日本 福冈 819-0395
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-12 出版日期:2019-08-01 发布日期:2019-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 李艳鸽,女,1984年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地质灾害防治与遥感解译方面的研究工作。E-mail: liyange@csu.edu.cn E-mail:-zheng_han@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:韩征,男,1986年生,博士,特聘副教授,主要从事地质灾害防治与数值模拟方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划专项(No.2018YFC1505401);国家自然科学基金项目(No.41702310);湖南省自然科学基金青年基金项目(No.2018JJ3644);中南大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(No.2018zzts652)。

Smoothed particle hydrodynamic numerical simulation of debris flow process based on Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou constitutive model

HAN Zheng1, SU Bin1, LI Yan-ge1, WANG Wei2, WANG Wei-dong1, 3, HUANG Jian-ling1, CHEN Guang-qi4   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 2. School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China; 3. The Key Laboratory of Engineering Structures of Heavy Haul Railway, Ministry of Education, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 4. Department of Civil and Structural Engineering, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 819-0395, Japan
  • Received:2018-11-12 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program of China(2018YFC1505401), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41702310), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2018JJ3644), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Central South University (2018zzts652).

摘要: 本构模型是描述泥石流流变特性的关键,也是决定其动力过程数值模拟准确性的核心问题之一。泥石流流体属多相混合物,现有的研究已证实其存在剪切增稠或剪切变稀的现象,传统基于Bingham及Cross线性本构关系的数值模型难以准确描述泥石流流变特性。文中探讨了Bingham模型在低剪应变率下的数值发散问题,在光滑粒子流体动力学(SPH)方法框架上建立了整合Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou(HBP)本构关系的稀性泥石流动力过程三维数值模型。相比传统基于浅水波假设的二维数值模型,所述方法从三维尺度建立SPH形式下的泥石流浆体纳维?斯托克斯方程并进行数值求解,可获取泥石流速度场时空分布及堆积形态,同时采用HBP本构关系描述泥石流流变特性,能在确保数值收敛的前提下反映泥石流流体在塑性屈服过渡段及大变形状态下应力?应变的非线性变化。为验证提出方法的合理性,结合小型模型槽实验观测进行了对比,结果表明数值模拟与实测结果基本吻合。

关键词: 泥石流, 非牛顿流体, HBP模型, 光滑粒子流体动力学(SPH), 数值模拟

Abstract: A rational constitutive model is critical for numerical simulation of rheological behavior of debris-flow. It is also one of the key issues that determine the accuracy of numerical simulation of its dynamic process. The numerical models based on Bingham and Cross constitutive models has been observed failing to simulate the shearing thickening and thinning phenomenon of the rheological behavior of debris-flow that belongs to multi-phase mixture of fluid and debris. We discuss the numerical divergence problem of using the Bingham model with low shear strain rate. To simulate the dynamic flow process of diluted debris-flow, the 3D numerical model is set up, applying an alternative solution of the Herschel-Bulkley-Papanastasiou(HBP) constitutive model with the smoothed particle hydrodynamic(SPH) method. Comparing to the traditional two-dimensional numerical model based on the hypothesis of shallow water wave, the proposed method in this paper solves Navier-Stokes equations describing the debris-flow with the SPH in three-dimension, thus the velocity field and deposition pattern of debris flow can be simulated. The proposed method incorporates the HBP constitutive model, ensuring the numerical convergence, can perform well to reveal the non-linear variation of stress-strain relationship of debris flow at transition phase of plastic yield and large shear rate. The proposed method is verified by a flume experiment. It indicates that the simulation results match well with the experimental measurements.

Key words: debris flow, non-newtonian fluid, Herschel-Bulkley-Papanasiou(HBP) model, smoothed particle hydrodynamic(SPH), numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • P642.33
[1] 安笑, 潘华利, 欧国强, 孔玲, 李炳志, . 恒定渗流作用泥石流碎屑物质起动判别模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 115-122.
[2] 许成顺, 豆鹏飞, 杜修力, 陈苏, 韩俊艳, . 基于自由场大型振动台试验的饱和砂土 固-液相变特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[3] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[4] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[5] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[6] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[7] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[8] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[9] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[10] 李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[11] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[12] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[13] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[14] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[15] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!