岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4): 1045-1055.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1198

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环荷载作用下击实粉土累积塑性变形研究

任华平1,刘希重2,宣明敏2,叶新宇2,李强3,张升2   

  1. 1. 民航机场规划设计研究总院有限公司,北京 101312;2. 中南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410075; 3. 北京大兴国际机场建设指挥部,北京 102600
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-13 修回日期:2020-10-03 出版日期:2021-04-12 发布日期:2021-04-25
  • 通讯作者: 叶新宇,男,1989年生,博士,讲师,主要从事边坡和基坑加固、地基处理方面的研究。E-mail: 218175@csu.edu.cn E-mail:rhp2007@126.com
  • 作者简介:任华平,男,1987年生,硕士,工程师,主要从事民航机场道基施设计和研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51722812,No. 52008401);湖湘高层次人才聚集工程创新团队项目(No. 2019RS1008)。

Study of cumulative plastic deformation of compacted silt under cyclic loading

REN Hua-ping1, LIU Xi-zhong2, XUAN Ming-min2, YE Xing-yu2, LI Qiang3, ZHANG Sheng2   

  1. 1. China Airport Construction Group Corporation, Beijing 101312, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410075, China; 3. Construction Headquarter of Beijing Daxing International Airport, Beijing 102600, China
  • Received:2020-08-13 Revised:2020-10-03 Online:2021-04-12 Published:2021-04-25
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51722812, 52008401) and the Hunan High-level Talents Aggregation Project Innovation Team Project (2019RS1008).

摘要: 在飞机荷载长期作用下,粉土道基累积塑性应变发展特性会发生改变。为揭示荷载频率和压实度对粉土道基累积塑性变形的影响规律,开展了室内大型动三轴试验。试验结果表明,不同循环应力比条件下,击实粉土试样的累积塑性应变发展规律可分为3种:塑性安定、塑性蠕变和增量破坏,压实度对累积塑性应变及临界循环应力比均有影响,荷载频率对加载前期的累积塑性变形发展速率影响较为显著;同时,较小压力水平条件下,压实度对试样回弹特性影响较大,压实度越大,试样回弹模量越大。针对稳定型粉土试样累积塑性应变的发展特点,提出了考虑压实度和荷载频率共同影响的累积塑性应变模型,并利用试验数据对模型拟合,发现相同压实度或荷载频率下,各拟合参数与循环应力比呈较好的线性关系;在此基础上对各参数进行归一处理,确定了各参数与循环应力比、压实度和荷载频率的变化关系。

关键词: 击实粉土, 动三轴试验, 循环应力比, 压实度, 荷载频率, 累积塑性应变模型

Abstract: Due to the long-term landing and take-off of aircraft, the development characteristics of the cumulative plastic strain of silt foundation will change. The influences of loading frequency and degree of compaction on the long-term cumulative plastic deformation of compacted silt under different dynamic stress amplitudes were studied based on dynamic triaxial test. The test results show that the cumulative plastic strain evolution type of compacted silt under different cyclic stress ratios can be divided into three types: plastic shakedown, plastic creep and incremental failure. In addition, the degree of compaction affects the cumulative plastic strain and the ratio of critical cyclic dynamic stress. And the loading frequency has a significant influence on the increase rate of cumulative deformation in the early stage of loading. In addition, the elastic behavior is obviously influenced by the degree of compaction, with the dynamic modulus increasing with the increase of compactness. Based on that the evolution characteristics of cumulative plastic strain of compacted silt showing a stable type, a model of cumulative plastic strain of compacted silt was proposed, in which the influences of degree of compaction and loading frequency were considered. It was found that the fitting parameters had a good linear relationship with the cyclic stress ratio under the same degree of compaction and loading frequency during model parameter fitting. Based on the analysis of the correlation among the parameters, the relationships between these parameters and cyclic stress ratio, degree of compaction and loading frequency were determined.

Key words: compacted silt, dynamic triaxial test, cyclic stress ratio, degree of compaction, loading frequency, cumulative plastic strain model

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 李亚峰, 聂如松, 李元军, 冷伍明, 阮波, . 间歇性循环荷载下路基细粒土填料永久 变形特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1065-1077.
[2] 刘倩倩, 李舰, 蔡国庆, 李朋林, 李昕哲, . 全吸力范围的盐渍土持水特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 713-722.
[3] 王家全, 畅振超, 唐毅, 唐滢, . 循环荷载下加筋砾性土填料的动三轴试验分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2851-2860.
[4] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[5] 王康宇, 庄妍, 耿雪玉, . 铁路路基粗粒土填料临界动应力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1865-1873.
[6] 马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[7] 梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的 循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[8] 梁珂, 何杨, 陈国兴, . 南沙珊瑚砂的动剪切模量和阻尼比特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 23-31.
[9] 王欢, 陈群, 王红鑫, 张文举, . 不同压实度和基质吸力的粉煤灰三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 224-230.
[10] 张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[11] 梁 珂, 陈国兴, 何 杨, 刘景儒, . 基于相关函数理论的动模量和阻尼比计算新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1368-1376.
[12] 裴向军, 朱 凌, 崔圣华, 张晓超, 梁玉飞, 高会会, 张子东. 大光包滑坡层间错动带液化特性及 滑坡启动成因探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1085-1096.
[13] 王丽艳, 巩文雪, 曹晓婷, 姜朋明, 王炳辉. 砾钢渣抗液化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3741-3750.
[14] 周恩全, 王琼, 宗之鑫, 陆建飞. 饱和橡胶砂动力特性动三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3797-3804.
[15] 李 宣, 孙德安,张俊然,. 吸力历史对非饱和粉土动力变形特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2829-2836.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 谭贤君,陈卫忠,杨建平,杨春和. 盐岩储气库温度-渗流-应力-损伤耦合模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3633 -3641 .
[2] 魏 星,王 刚,余志灵. 交通荷载下软土地基长期沉降的有限元法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 2011 -2015 .
[3] 温世亿,李静,苏霞,姚雄. 复杂应力条件下围岩破坏的细观特征研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2399 -2406 .
[4] 刘 杰,李建林,屈建军,陈 星,李剑武,骆世威. 基于卸荷岩体力学的大岗山坝肩边坡水平位移发育的多因素影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3619 -3626 .
[5] 蒋臻蔚,彭建兵,王启耀. 西安市地铁3号线不良地质问题及对策研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 317 -321 .
[6] 刘用海,朱向荣,常林越. 基于Casagrande法数学分析确定先期固结压力[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 211 -214 .
[7] 李兴高,刘维宁. 挡土结构上水-土压力分算的进一步探讨[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 419 -424 .
[8] 孙长帅,杨海巍,徐光黎. 岩石锚杆基础抗拔承载力计算方法探究[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 75 -78 .
[9] 杨迎晓,龚晓南,范 川,金兴平,陈 华. 钱塘江冲海积非饱和粉土剪胀性三轴试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 38 -42 .
[10] 费 康 ,王军军 ,陈 毅. 桩承式路堤土拱效应的试验和数值研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 1975 -1983 .