岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (2): 473-482.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0616

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

卸荷-增孔压条件下花岗岩残积土的力学特性

舒荣军1, 2,孔令伟1, 2,周振华1, 2,简涛1, 2,李甜果1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-27 接受日期:2022-08-17 出版日期:2023-02-10 发布日期:2023-02-17
  • 通讯作者: 孔令伟,男,1967年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事特殊土的力学特性与灾害防治技术研究。E-mail: lwkong@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:shurongjun16@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:舒荣军,男,1995年生,博士,主要从事特殊土力学特性方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 12272394,No. 11672320)

Mechanical behavior of granite residual soil under unloading and increasing pore water pressure

SHU Rong-jun1, 2, KONG Ling-wei1, 2, ZHOU Zhen-hua1, 2, JIAN Tao1, 2, LI Tian-guo1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2022-04-27 Accepted:2022-08-17 Online:2023-02-10 Published:2023-02-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (12272394, 11672320).

摘要: 建(构)筑物因土中孔隙水压力升高而失稳破坏的情形屡见不鲜,常剪应力增孔压试验是相关研究的常用手段,但迄今鲜见考虑施工期开挖卸荷影响的试验研究。为探究初始卸荷对花岗岩残积土增孔压过程力学行为的影响,在常规增孔压试验中增加了初始卸荷阶段,开展了一系列考虑初始卸荷程度和卸荷滞时影响的卸荷-增孔压试验,分析土体变形、屈服和强度特性的初始卸荷效应与卸荷滞时效应,并与常规增孔压试验结果对比以揭示初始应力路径的影响。试验结果表明:增孔压过程的变形发展具有明显的阶段性,土体屈服后因其剪胀潜势和变形迅速而产生负超静孔压增量,有效平均应力转而增大;初始卸荷对增孔压过程土体力学性能具有明显的劣化作用,表现为刚度与屈服强度均随初始卸荷程度的增大而衰减;与被动压缩这种“加荷”式应力路径相比,初始卸荷的不利影响更为显著;土体力学性能的劣化随卸荷滞时的增长而加剧;屈服摩擦角随初始卸荷程度的增大逐渐减小,但始终大于临界状态摩擦角。

关键词: 花岗岩残积土, 力学性质, 卸荷, 增孔压, 应力路径, 卸荷滞时

Abstract: Failure of buildings and structures due to the increase in pore water pressure (Uw) in soil is common in practice, and triaxial test under stress path of decreasing mean effective stress and constant deviator stress (CQT) is a frequently-used research method in related studies. However, to date experimental studies considering the influence of excavation-induced unloading during construction are rarely reported. In order to explore the effects of initial unloading on the mechanical response of granite residual soil during the increase in Uw, a stage of initial unloading was added in the conventional CQT and a series of modified CQTs were conducted, based on which the effects of initial unloading and unloading lag on the deformation characteristics, yielding behavior and strength properties of the soil were analyzed, and results of conventional and modified CQTs were compared to investigate the influence of initial stress path. The experiment results show that the deformation response to the increase in Uw can be divided into three different stages, negative increment of Uw emerges and mean effective stress increases instead as a result of rapid deformation and dilatation potential of the soil after yielding. The initial unloading brings about the degradation of the mechanical performance of the soil, which is manifested as the decrease in both stiffness and yielding strength with the increase in initial unloading degree. Compared with the conventional triaxial compression stress path, which is of “loading” type, initial unloading has a more significantly adverse effect. The degradation of soil performance intensifies as the unloading lag increases. The mobilized friction angle at yielding point decreases with the increase in the initial unloading degree, but is always greater than the mobilized friction angle at critical state.

Key words: granite residual soil, mechanical behavior, unloading, increasing pore water pressure, stress path, unloading lag

中图分类号: 

  • TU 449
[1] 尹敬涵, 崔臻, 盛谦, 陈健, 张茂础, . 循环荷载作用下岩石劈裂结构面剪切力学特性演化与影响因素研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 109-118.
[2] 郭佳奇, 程立攀, 朱斌忠, 田永超, 黄鑫. 持续开挖效应下结构面剪切力学性质与能量特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 131-143.
[3] 陈星, 李建林, 邓华锋, 党莉, 刘奇, 王兴霞, 王伟, . 卸荷蠕变条件下软硬相接岩层非协调变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 303-316.
[4] 高敏, 何绍衡, 夏唐代, 丁智, 王新刚, 张琼方, . 复杂应力路径下钙质砂颗粒破碎及抗剪强度特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 321-330.
[5] 孟凡丽, 娄桢桢, 葛威, . 长期循环荷载下卸荷粉土动力特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 383-388.
[6] 金鑫, 王铁行, 郝延周, 赵再昆, 张亮, 张猛, . 桩间黄土卸荷湿陷过程中卸荷量计算方法初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(9): 2399-2409.
[7] 汤连生, 王昊, 孙银磊, 刘其鑫, . 干湿过程中花岗岩残积土抗拉强度变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1749-1760.
[8] 朱旻, 陈湘生, 张国涛, 庞小朝, 苏栋, 刘继强, . 花岗岩残积土硬化土模型参数反演及工程应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1061-1072.
[9] 朱文波, 戴国亮, 王博臣, 龚维明, 王海波, 张宇, . 吸力式沉箱基础底部土体卸荷蠕变及其长期 抗拔承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 669-678.
[10] 王海波, 吕伟华, 武荘, 朱文波, . 不同温度应力路径下饱和黏土剪切特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 679-687.
[11] 薛卉, 舒彪, 陈君洁, 路伟, 胡永鹏, 王益民, 曾凡, 黄若宸, . 高温高压下超临界二氧化碳作用对花岗岩 力学性质影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 377-384.
[12] 段淑倩, 高坡, 江权, 周扬一, 徐鼎平. 高地应力卸荷条件下错动带塑性变形 规律与硬化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 97-109.
[13] 姬胜戈, 王宝仲, 杨秀娟, 樊恒辉. 木质素磺酸钙改性分散性土的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2405-2415.
[14] 马成昊, 朱长歧, 刘海峰, 崔翔, 王天民, 姜开放, 易明星, . 土的颗粒形貌研究现状及展望[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2041-2058.
[15] 刘越, 陈东霞, 王晖, 于佳静, . 干湿循环下考虑裂隙发育的残积土边坡响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1933-1943.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .