岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (7): 1933-1943.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1504

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿循环下考虑裂隙发育的残积土边坡响应分析

刘越1, 2,陈东霞1, 3,王晖4,于佳静1   

  1. 1. 厦门大学 建筑与土木工程学院,福建 厦门 361005;2. 福建省地质灾害重点实验室,福建 福州 350002; 3. 厦门市交通基础设施智能管养工程技术研究中心,福建 厦门 361005;4. 四川都江堰市经济开发区管委会,四川 都江堰,611830
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-10 修回日期:2021-04-09 出版日期:2021-07-12 发布日期:2021-07-19
  • 作者简介:刘越,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事残积土基坑或边坡稳定性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    自然资源部丘陵山地地质灾害防治重点实验室(福建省地质灾害重点实验室)开放基金(No. FJKLGH2021K004);厦门市交通基础设施智能管养工程技术研究中心开放基金(No. TCIMI201804)。

Response analysis of residual soil slope considering crack development under drying-wetting cycles

LIU Yue1, 2, CHEN Dong-xia1, 3, WANG Hui4, YU Jia-jing1   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China; 2. Fujian Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China; 3. Xiamen Engineering Technology Center for Intelligent Maintenance of Infrastructure, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China; 4. Administrative Committee of Dujiangyan Economic Development Zone, Dujiangyan, Sichuan 611830, China
  • Received:2020-10-10 Revised:2021-04-09 Online:2021-07-12 Published:2021-07-19
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Opening Fund of Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention of Hilly Mountains, Ministry of Natural Resources (Fujian Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention) (FJKLGH2021K004) and Xiamen Transportation Infrastructure Intelligent Management Engineering Technology Research Center Open Fund (TCIMI201804).

摘要: 为研究带裂隙的花岗岩残积土边坡在反复干湿循环作用下的响应规律,利用模型试验模拟干湿循环过程,通过处理裂隙图像量化裂隙宽度扩展,结合坡内土体直剪试验,推导强度衰减规律和裂隙深度相关的计算公式。对比模型试验和数值模拟结果,分析考虑裂隙发育下的残积土边坡响应情况,结果如下:干湿循环下残积土裂隙宽度扩展符合Logistic模型,裂隙深度与强度衰减有确定的量化关系,且随着干湿循环次数增加,裂隙深度趋于稳定;干湿循环次数较少时,坡底位置含水率变化明显滞后于坡顶和坡中位置,但随着干湿循环次数增加及裂隙扩展,边坡各位置的含水率变化趋于一致。裂隙扩展对边坡各位置变形均有影响,随着干湿循环次数增加,考虑裂隙扩展的坡底和坡中位置变形与不考虑裂隙的情况趋于一致,但坡顶区域变形更大,致使裂隙边坡的坡顶与坡底的变形差距增加。

关键词: 干湿循环作用, 花岗岩残积土, 裂隙, 含水率, 变形

Abstract: In order to study the response of granite residual soil slope with cracks under different number of drying-wetting cycles (D-W cycles), model test was carried out and the crack width expansion index was quantified by investigating the crack images. Based on the direct shear test, the calculation formulas of soil strength degradation and crack depth were developed. Then, the model test and the numerical simulation results were compared to analyze the response of the residual soil slope considering crack extension. The results showed that the fractures width expansion in residual soil under D-W cycles followed the Logistic model, and there was a quantitative relationship between fracture depth and strength degradation. The fracture depth tended to be stable with the increase of D-W cycles. When the number of D-W cycles was small, the change of moisture content at the bottom of the slope lags significantly behind that at the top and the middle of the slope, however, the change of moisture content at each position of the slope tended to be the same with the increase of D-W cycles. The deformation at the bottom and the middle of the slope with the crack expansion tended to be the same compared to the slope without cracks, however, the deformation at the top area was larger, which led to the increase of the deformation gap between the top and bottom of the cracked slope.

Key words: drying-wetting cycles, granite residual soil, crack, moisture content, deformation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 葛苗苗, 李宁, 盛岱超, 朱才辉, PINEDA Jubert, . 水力耦合作用下非饱和压实黄土 细观变形机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2437-2448.
[2] 徐龙飞, 翁效林, 张爱军, 赵高文, WONG Henry, FABBRI Antonin, . 变湿度条件下生土材料持水特性及气 态水迁移效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2489-2498.
[3] 朱晟, 卢知是, 刘纯, 王京, . 堆石体现场振动压实试验研究与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2569-2577.
[4] 蒋水华, 欧阳苏, 冯泽文, 康青, 黄劲松, 杨志刚, . 基于结构面参数概率分布更新的 节理岩质边坡可靠性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2589-2599.
[5] 赵志强, 戴福初, 闵弘, 谭晔, . 原状黄土−古土壤中水分入渗过程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2611-2621.
[6] 王兴开, 夏才初, 朱哲明, 谢文兵, 宋磊博, 韩观胜, . 单级荷载下极软煤岩长期蠕变规律及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2078-2088.
[7] 刘鑫, 许宏发, 范鹏贤, 耿汉生, 莫家权, 王德荣. 围压下岩石填充裂隙对应力波衰减规律的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2099-2108.
[8] 苗胜军, 王辉, 杨鹏锦, 王亚欣, . 近疲劳强度循环荷载对泥质石英粉砂岩 力学特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2109-2119.
[9] 姜彤, 翟天雅, 张俊然, 赵金玓, 王俪锦, 宋陈雨, 潘旭威. 基于粒子图像测速技术的黄土径向劈裂试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2120-2126.
[10] 乔趁, 王宇, 宋正阳, 李长洪, 侯志强, . 饱水裂隙花岗岩周期冻胀力演化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2141-2150.
[11] 崔溦, 王利新, 江志安, 王超, 王枭华, 张社荣, . 基于修正立方定律的岩体粗糙裂隙网络 注浆过程模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2250-2258.
[12] 黄福云, 何凌峰, 单玉麟, 胡晨曦, 周志明, . 整体式桥台−混凝土桩−土相互作用拟静力试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1803-1814.
[13] 李博, 崔逍峰, 莫洋洋, 邹良超, 伍法权, . 法向应力作用下砂岩错位裂隙变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1850-1860.
[14] 董青, 周正华, 苏杰, 李小军, 郝冰, . 基于对数动骨架的可考虑液化大变形本构[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1903-1910.
[15] 朱淳, 何满潮, 张晓虎, 陶志刚, 尹乾, 李利峰, . 恒阻大变形锚杆非线性力学模型 及恒阻行为影响参数分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1911-1924.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .