岩土力学 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2120-2126.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0001

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于粒子图像测速技术的黄土径向劈裂试验研究

姜彤,翟天雅,张俊然,赵金玓,王俪锦,宋陈雨,潘旭威   

  1. 华北水利水电大学 河南省岩土力学与结构工程重点实验室,河南 郑州 450046
  • 收稿日期:2021-01-03 修回日期:2021-03-10 出版日期:2021-08-11 发布日期:2021-08-16
  • 通讯作者: 张俊然,男,1984年生,博士,副教授,主要从特殊土与非饱和土工程性质方面的研究。E-mail: zhangjunran@ncwu.edu.cn E-mail:jiangtong@ncwu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:姜彤,男,1973年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学及地学信息方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河南省高等学校青年骨干教师培养计划项目(No. 2020GGJS-094);河南省高等学校重点科研项目(No. 21A410002);国家自然科学基金(No. 41602295)。

Diametric splitting tests on loess based on particle image velocimetry technique

JIANG Tong, ZHAI Tian-ya, ZHANG Jun-ran, ZHAO Jin-di, WANG Li-jin, SONG Chen-yu, PAN Xu-wei   

  1. Henan Province Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Structural Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046, China
  • Received:2021-01-03 Revised:2021-03-10 Online:2021-08-11 Published:2021-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Foundation for University Key Teacher by the Ministry of Education of Henan Province (2020GGJS-094), the Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (21A410002) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41602295).

摘要: 用粒子图像测速(PIV)测试系统对黄土原状样和重塑样进行了一系列劈裂试验,同时用压汞仪对黄土原状样和重塑样进行了微观结构定量对比分析,探讨结构性、初始干密度对抗拉强度的影响。试验结果表明:当试样劈裂破坏时,原状样峰值荷载比重塑样的大,重塑样的峰值荷载随着初始干密度的增加而增加。由位移矢量场可知,原状样劈裂破坏时主裂隙倾斜,次生裂隙不发育;重塑样劈裂破坏时主裂隙呈径向垂直,次生裂隙较发育;不同初始干密度重塑样的裂隙发育形态基本一致。当初始干密度相等时,原状样的累计汞压入量曲线和孔径分布密度曲线均高于重塑样,原状样的集聚体间孔隙比重塑样的多,但由于原状样具有明显的结构性,因而原状样的抗拉强度比重塑样的高。随着初始干密度增加,重塑样的累计汞压入量曲线向下移动,孔径分布密度曲线峰值向左移动,集聚体间孔隙逐渐减小甚至消失,导致抗拉强度随着初始干密度增大而增加。

关键词: 原状黄土, 抗拉强度, 位移矢量场, 裂隙, 压汞

Abstract: A series of splitting tests was carried out on the intact and remolded loess specimens by particle image velocimetry (PIV) test system, and the microstructure of the intact and remolded loess specimens were quantitatively analyzed by mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP), so as to discuss the influence of the structure and initial dry density on the tensile strength. The test results show that the peak load of the intact specimens is bigger than that of the remolded specimens when the specimens splitting failure. The peak load of the remolded specimens increases with increasing initial dry density. The displacement vector field shows that the primary cracks incline and the secondary cracks do not develop during the split failure of the loess specimens. When the remolded specimens split, the primary cracks are radially vertical, the secondary cracks more develop, and the crack morphology of the remolded specimens with different initial dry densities is basically the same. For the equal initial dry density, the cumulative intruded porosimetry volume curve and pore diameter distribution density curve of the intact specimen are both higher than those of the remolded specimen, and the inter-aggregate pores of the intact specimen are more than those of the remolded specimen. However, due to the obvious structure, the tensile strength of the intact specimen is higher than that of the remolded specimen. As the initial dry density increases, the cumulative intruded porosimetry volume curve of the remolded specimen moves downward, and the peak of the pore distribution density curve moves to the left. The inter-aggregate pores gradually decrease or even disappear. As a result, the tensile strength increases with increasing initial dry density.

Key words: intact loess, tensile strength, displacement vector field, crack, mercury intrusion

中图分类号: 

  • TU 431
[1] 蒋水华, 欧阳苏, 冯泽文, 康青, 黄劲松, 杨志刚, . 基于结构面参数概率分布更新的 节理岩质边坡可靠性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(9): 2589-2599.
[2] 刘鑫, 许宏发, 范鹏贤, 耿汉生, 莫家权, 王德荣. 围压下岩石填充裂隙对应力波衰减规律的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2099-2108.
[3] 乔趁, 王宇, 宋正阳, 李长洪, 侯志强, . 饱水裂隙花岗岩周期冻胀力演化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2141-2150.
[4] 崔溦, 王利新, 江志安, 王超, 王枭华, 张社荣, . 基于修正立方定律的岩体粗糙裂隙网络 注浆过程模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2250-2258.
[5] 李博, 崔逍峰, 莫洋洋, 邹良超, 伍法权, . 法向应力作用下砂岩错位裂隙变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1850-1860.
[6] 刘越, 陈东霞, 王晖, 于佳静, . 干湿循环下考虑裂隙发育的残积土边坡响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1933-1943.
[7] 黄娜, 蒋宇静, 程远方, 刘日成, . 基于3D打印技术的复杂三维粗糙裂隙网络 渗流特性试验及数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1659-1668.
[8] 汪时机, 骆赵刚, 李贤, 文桃. 考虑局部含水率效应的浅层土体开裂 过程与力学机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(5): 1395-1403.
[9] 俞缙, 刘泽瀚, 林立华, 黄建国, 任文斌, 周垒, . 变幅循环加卸载作用下大理岩扩容特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 2934-2942.
[10] 刘享华, 张科, 李娜, 齐飞飞, 叶锦明, . 含孔双裂隙3D打印类岩石试件破裂行为定量识别[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3017-3028.
[11] 张宏学, 刘卫群, . 非平衡解吸状态下页岩气储层渗透率演化机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2696-2704.
[12] 张志韬, 陈生水, 吉恩跃, 傅中志, . 聚丙烯纤维加筋砾质黏土的拉伸断裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2713-2721.
[13] 刘俊东, 唐朝生, 曾浩, 施斌. 干湿循环条件下黏性土干缩裂隙演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2763-2772.
[14] 薛松, 杨志兵, 李东奇, 陈益峰. 滴状流条件下非饱和交叉裂隙分流机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 59-67.
[15] 王珂, 盛金昌, 郜会彩, 田晓丹, 詹美礼, 罗玉龙, . 应力−渗流侵蚀耦合作用下粗糙裂隙渗流特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 30-40.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .