›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 782-788.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0757

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Shaking table model test for framed anchors in landslide prevention

WANG Ban-qiao, LI Nan, MEN Yu-ming, ZHANG Miao-zhi   

  1. School of Geology Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China
  • Received:2016-04-06 Online:2018-03-12 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41440021) and the Special Funds for Basic Research Funds in Central Universities (l2014G1261049).

Abstract: In order to study the dynamic responses of anchorage system under earthquake,the model of landslide supported by anchor bars and lattice beam is carried out using shaking table. The difference of dynamic response of anchor bars in different locations and the mechanism behavior of anchor bars under earthquake are studied by inputting waves of Wenchuan earthquake, EL Centro earthquake and sine seismic wave to monitor the axial force of anchor bars, landslide acceleration and landslide displacement. The results suggest that under low level earthquake loading (0.05 g~0.40 g), the surface effect of slope toe is more obvious than other parts of the landslide, and the sliding surface near slope toe is prone to fracturing because of repeated rubbing and cutting. Based on pseudo-static method design, it is advised that short anchors or soil nails should be driven into toe slope in order to balance the uncoordinated reciprocating motion of sliding surface near slope. Under high level earthquake loading (0.6 g~0.8 g), the surface effect of slope shoulder is more obvious, the fracture in sliding surface near slope top is longer and wider than before, and the sliding surface is more likely to crack or collapse. It is advised that the first-row anchors should be extended in order to restrain the development of cracks in slope sliding surface. Meanwhile, using short anchors or growing plants with developed root system at top of the slope is necessary to protect the slope. Slope with anchorage system is not prone to as-a-whole slope damage like plain soil slope, and under high level earthquake loading, firstly anchors in slope toe are damaged, and then tensile force of top anchors sharply rises due to cracks caused by pulling force at the top surface of slope. The results provide a reasonable foundation for the design of anchor bars under earthquake.

Key words: landslide, anchorage system, earthquake, dynamic response, shaking table test

CLC Number: 

  • P 642

[1] XU Chao, LUO Min-min, REN Fei-fan, SHEN Pan-pan, YANG Zi-fan. Experimental study on seismic behaviour of reinforced soil flexible abutment composite structures [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 179-186.
[2] XU Cheng-shun, DOU Peng-fei, DU Xiu-li, CHEN Su, HAN Jun-yan, . Study on solid-liquid phase transition characteristics of saturated sand based on large shaking table test on free field [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2189-2198.
[3] YANG Chang-wei, TONG Xin-hao, WANG Dong, TAN Xin-rong, GUO Xue-yan, CAO Li-cong, . Shaking table test of dynamic response law of subgrade with ballast track under earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2215-2223.
[4] QIAO Xiang-jin, LIANG Qing-guo, CAO Xiao-ping, WANG Li-li, . Research on dynamic responses of the portal in bridge-tunnel connected system [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[5] HE Jing-bin, FENG Zhong-ju, DONG Yun-xiu, HU Hai-bo, LIU Chuang, GUO Sui-zhu, ZHANG Cong, WU Min, WANG Zhen, . Dynamic response of pile foundation under pile-soil-fault coupling effect in meizoseismal area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[6] DU Wen-jie, SHENG Qian, FU Xiao-dong, TANG Hua, CHEN He, DU Yu-xiang, ZHOU Yong-qiang. Dynamic stability analysis and failure mechanism of Yanyang village landslide under earthquake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[7] REN Yang, LI Tian-bin, LAI Lin. Centrifugal shaking table test on dynamic response characteristics of tunnel entrance slope in strong earthquake area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[8] HAN Jun-yan, LI Man-jun, ZHONG Zi-lan, XU Jing-shu, LI Li-yun, LAN Jing-yan, DU Xiu-li. Seismic response of soil under non-uniform excitation based on shaking table test of buried pipelines [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[9] ZHANG Lu-ming, ZHOU Yong, FAN Gang, CAI Hong-yu, DONG Yun. Seismic behavior research and reinforcement effect evaluation of composite retaining structures with nuclear safety level anti-dip layered soft rock slope under strong earthquakes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[10] WANG Li-an, ZHAO Jian-chang, HOU Xiao-qiang, LIU Sheng-wei, WANG Zuo-wei. Lamb problem for non-homogeneous saturated half-space [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[11] JIAN Wen-bin, HUANG Cong-hui, LUO Yang-hua, NIE Wen. Experimental study on wetting front migration induced by rainfall infiltration in unsaturated eluvial and residual soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1123-1133.
[12] PAN Dan-guang, CHENG Ye, CHEN Qing-jun. Shaking table test of the effect of underground shopping mall structure on ground motion [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[13] HAN Dong-dong, MEN Yu-ming, HU Zhao-jiang. Experimental study of anti-sliding mechanism and force of lattice anchor in soil landslide [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1189-1194.
[14] LI Ping, ZHANG Yu-dong, BO Tao, GU Jun-ru, ZHU Sheng. Study of ground motion effect of trapezoidal valley site based on centrifuge shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[15] FENG Li, DING Xuan-ming, WANG Cheng-long, CHEN Zhi-xiong. Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!