Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (8): 2173-2184.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2020.1873

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Estimation model of limit values of shear strength of root-bearing soil based on interface bonding

XIA Xin1, 2, JIANG Yuan-jun1, SU Li-jun1, MEHTAB Alam1, LI Jia-jia3   

  1. 1. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu, Sichuan 610041, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. College of Water Conservancy and Hydropower Engineering, Sichuan Agricultural University, Yaan, Sichuan 625014, China
  • Received:2020-12-13 Revised:2021-03-24 Online:2021-08-11 Published:2021-08-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41761144077) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA 23090202).

Abstract: At present, the quantitative evaluation models of mechanical reinforcement of soil by roots lack consideration of root-soil interface bonding effect. In order to improve the accuracy and applicability of the quantitative model, this study was premised on the widely used Wu model, combined with the failure mode of root system in root-soil, and quantified the bonding effect of interface between root and soil interface by interface bonding strength parameters. Thus, an estimation model of limit values of shear strength of root-bearing soil based on interface bonding was established, which considered the influence of soil stress, root diameter, root length, and initial angle between root and shear direction in root-bearing soil. Furthermore, the comparison of shear strength of root-bearing soil between the measured values of direct shear test and the calculated values of the model showed that the measured values were within the range of the calculated values of the model established in this article. When the angle between the root and the shear direction was 45°, the measured value was close to the maximum value of the model calculation, and when the angle was 90°, the measured value was close to the average value of the limit values of the model calculation. Compared with the calculated value of Wu model, the accuracy of the estimation model established in this article was increased by five times on average. Moreover, the sensitivity analysis of model parameters showed that the additional soil strength provided by roots was greatly affected by the root number parameters, root size parameters and root-soil interface bond strength parameters.

Key words: root-bearing soil, root-soil interface bonding strength, shear strength, mechanical model

CLC Number: 

  • TU 43
[1] SONG Lei-bo, KANG Qian-qian, DU Shi-gui, ZHONG Zhen, WANG Gang, WANG Xing-kai, HAN Guan-sheng, ZHAO Jin-shuai, . Anisotropy mechanism of shear strength based on wear and shear failure evolution of asperities of joint surface [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(9): 2331-2343.
[2] WU Zhen-hua, PAN Peng-zhi, PAN Jun-feng, WANG Zhao-feng, GAO Jia-ming, . Analysis of mechanism of rock burst and law of mining induced events in graben structural area [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(8): 2225-2238.
[3] FAN Xiang, DENG Zhi-ying, CUI Zhi-meng, HE Zhong-ming, LIN Hang, . A new peak shear strength model for soft-hard joint [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(7): 1861-1870.
[4] ZHU Chun, HE Man-chao, ZHANG Xiao-hu, TAO Zhi-gang, YIN Qian, LI Li-feng, . Nonlinear mechanical model of constant resistance and large deformation bolt and influence parameters analysis of constant resistance behavior [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(7): 1911-1924.
[5] WANG Bin, HAN You-ming, ZHOU Xin, CHEN Cheng, ZHANG Xian-wei, GUI Lei, . In-situ test of shear modulus decay characteristics of lacustrine clay layer in Taihu Lake [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(7): 2031-2040.
[6] WANG Jia-hui, RAO Xi-bao, JIANG Ji-wei, YAO Jin-song, XIONG Shi-hu, LU Yi-wei, LI Hao-min, . Model experimental study of the shear mechanism of vibroflotation stone column composite foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(4): 1095-1103.
[7] YANG Ai-wu, YANG Shao-peng, LANG Rui-qing, CHEN Zi-he, . Three-dimensional mechanical properties of light solidified saline soil [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(3): 593-600.
[8] LU Feng, QIU Wen-ge, . A multiparameter non-proportional shear strength reduction method for slope stability analysis based on energy evolution theory [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(2): 547-557.
[9] LI Zhen-yu, OUYANG Miao, XIAO Hong-bin, WANG Ju-shan, LI Tao, LIU Si-si, . Improvement of slope soil consolidation capacity of plant root system based on regulation of root architecture [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(12): 3271-3280.
[10] GUO Jin-gang, LI Yao-hui, HE Fu-lian, CHEN Jian-hang, ZHAO Guang-ming, ZHANG Jun-wen, . Pullout simulation on fully grouted rock bolts based on residual shear strength [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(11): 2953-2960.
[11] ZHAN Liang-tong, SUN Qian-qian, GUO Xiao-gang, CHEN Rui, CHEN Yun-min, . Estimation of undrained shear strength of completely decomposed granite waste during rapid landfilling [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(1): 50-58.
[12] HUANG Chao-xuan, YUAN Wen-xi, HU Guo-jie, . An estimation method of horizontal bearing capacity of piles after pre-consolidation treatment for layered soft foundation [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2021, 42(1): 113-124.
[13] LIU Jie, YANG Yu-hua, YAO Hai-lin, LU Zheng, YUE Chan, . Experimental study on treatment of dispersive clay based on different modification methods [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[14] ZOU Xian-jian, WANG Yi-teng , WANG Chuan-ying, . Three-dimensional morphological feature of rock structural surfaces and dominant anti-slip direction using the borehole images [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[15] ZHANG Tian-long, ZENG Peng, LI Tian-bin, SUN Xiao-ping, . System reliability analyses of slopes based on active-learning radial basis function [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(9): 3098-3108.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] YAO Yang-ping, HOU Wei. Basic mechanical behavior of soils and their elastoplastic modeling[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] XU Jin-ming, QIANG Pei, ZHANG Peng-fei. Texture analysis of photographs of silty clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] XIANG Tian-bing, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui, JIANG Quan, ZHANG Chuan-qing. Rock failure mechanism and true triaxial experimental study of specimens with single structural plane under three-dimensional stress[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] SHI Yu-ling, MEN Yu-ming, PENG Jian-bing, HUANG Qiang-bing, LIU Hong-jia. Damage test study of different types structures of bridge decks by ground-fissure[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] XIA Dong-zhou, HE Yi-bin, LIU Jian-hua. Study of damping property and seismic action effect for soil-structure dynamic interaction system[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] XU Su-chao, FENG Xia-ting, CHEN Bing-rui. Experimental study of skarn under uniaxial cyclic loading and unloading test and acoustic emission characteristics[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] ZHANG Li-ting, QI Qing-lan, WEI Jing HUO Qian, ZHOU Guo-bin. Variation of void ratio in course of consolidation of warping clay[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] ZHANG Qi-yi. Study of failure patterns of foundation under combined loading[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] YI Jun, JIANG Yong-dong, XUAN Xue-fu, LUO Yun, ZHANG Yu. A liquid-solid dynamic coupling modelof ultrasound enhanced coalbed gas desorption and flow[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] TAO Gan-qiang, YANG Shi-jiao, REN Feng-yu. Experimental research on granular flow characters of caved ore and rock[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .