岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2): 499-510.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1195

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

单井注水改变填埋场中垃圾土温度的模拟

章涛1,施建勇2, 3,吴珣2, 3,韩尚宇1,纪晓磊1,张慧华1   

  1. 1. 南昌航空大学 土木建筑学院,江西 南昌 330063;2. 河海大学 岩土工程科学研究所,江苏 南京 210098; 3. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-03 修回日期:2021-12-01 出版日期:2022-02-11 发布日期:2022-02-22
  • 作者简介:章涛,男,1990年生,博士,讲师,主要从事环境岩土工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42002286,No. 41877222,No. 42002288,No. 52068054,No. 12062015);南昌航空大学博士启动基金(No. EA201911397)。

Simulation of waste temperature changed by single well water injection in a landfill

ZHANG Tao1, SHI Jian-yong2, 3, WU Xun2, 3, HAN Shang-yu1, JI Xiao-lei1, ZHANG Hui-hua1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330063, China; 2. Geotechnical Engineering Research Institute, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China
  • Received:2021-08-03 Revised:2021-12-01 Online:2022-02-11 Published:2022-02-22
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42002286, 41877222, 42002288, 52068054, 12062015) and the Doctoral Start-up Foundation of Nanchang Hangkong University (EA201911397).

摘要: 为了加速填埋场降解的稳定化,渗滤液回灌常被应用在工程实践中。使用竖井进行回灌是较为有效的方式之一。伴随着液体的注入,由于对流的产生,垃圾土温度势必会发生改变。基于无锡填埋场注水试验,对该现场试验过程中垃圾土温度的改变进行模拟。为此,建立了考虑渗透系数和孔隙率随深度变化的渗流模型,以及考虑渗流影响的热对流-热传导模型,并利用数值计算方法进行求解。在对比计算值和试验值之后,发现所建立的模型能较好地模拟注水期间渗滤液水位和垃圾土温度的变化规律。结果表明:在离注水井超过6 m处的位置,显现的液位相对滞后,至少滞后0.15 d,而且距离越远滞后的时间越长;在液位以下,注水井周围的垃圾土温度均低于初始温度。但是在径向上远离注水井3.6 m之外的垃圾土温度并不是全低于初始温度,在新老垃圾土交界处之上2 m范围内,会出现温度高于初始温度的现象,温度差可达3 ℃;新填垃圾土的已降解时长对单井注水工况下温度分布的影响较为显著。

关键词: 填埋场, 垃圾土, 注水, 温度, 模拟

Abstract: To accelerate the stabilization of degradation in landfills, leachate recirculation is often used in practical engineering, and recirculation using a vertical well is one of the more effective ways. With the injection of liquid, the temperature in the waste will change due to convection. In this study, the variation of waste temperature during the field test was first simulated based on the water injection test in the Wuxi landfill. A seepage flow model considering the variations in permeability and porosity with depth as well as a thermal convection-thermal conduction model considering the effect of seepage flow were then established, which were used to calculate the seepage and thermal convection-conduction processes of the landfill in numerical simulation. Comparison of theoretical and numerical results shows that the established models can well simulate the variations of leachate level and waste temperature during the water injection. The results are as follows: The leachate level is relatively lagged in the position more than 6 m away from the injection well, at least 0.15 days behind, and the farther the distance, the longer the lag time. Below the leachate level, the waste temperature around the injection well is lower than the initial temperature. However, the waste temperature 3.6 m away from the injection well in the radius direction is not all below the initial temperature. The temperature will be higher than the initial temperature within 2 m above the new and old waste junction, where the temperature difference can reach 3 ℃. The waste degraded time significantly affects temperature distribution under single well water injection.

Key words: landfill, waste, water injection, temperature, simulation

中图分类号: X 705
[1] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 周雨晴, 吕鑫龙, . 红层软岩崩解面释放率与崩解特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 285-296.
[2] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[3] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[4] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[5] 蔡田明, 李顺群, 程学磊, 周燕, 李有兵, 井乐炜, 方心畅, 王英红, . 温度对土压力盒测试数据的影响分析与应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1967-1976.
[6] 唐巨鹏, 黄磊, 潘一山, 任凌冉, 张昕, 张众华, . 煤层倾角突变区煤与瓦斯突出模拟试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1719-1730.
[7] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[8] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[9] 王刚, 王恩茂, 隆清明, 徐浩, 陈雪畅, 刘昆轮, . 考虑滤失效应的煤层水力压裂与裂隙扩展关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1071-1083.
[10] 武孝天, 姚仰平, 魏然, 崔文杰. 基于统一硬化模型的隧道施工引发土体变形数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 1013-1024.
[11] 郭焕明, 张虎, 丑亚玲, 郑波, 胡金涛, 韩善博, . 径向冻融过程中软黏土水热力试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 905-915.
[12] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[13] 郭旭辉, 朱鸿鹄, 吴冰, 高宇新, 胡乐乐, 曹鼎峰, . 基于人工神经网络的黄土含水率光纤被动感测技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 653-664.
[14] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[15] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!