岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 882-892.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0237CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0237

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

降雨条件下加筋改良软岩残积土排水性能试验研究

杨俊鹏1,段晓沛1, 2,张倩1,李博文1,汪益敏1   

  1. 1. 华南理工大学 土木与交通学院,广东 广州 510641;2. 天津市政工程设计研究总院有限公司,天津 300380
  • 收稿日期:2025-03-06 接受日期:2025-04-29 出版日期:2026-03-17 发布日期:2026-03-18
  • 通讯作者: 汪益敏,女,1966年生,博士,教授,主要从事交通岩土工程和绿色加筋土工程等方面的研究。E-mail: ctymwang@scut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:杨俊鹏,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事路基工程和绿色加筋土工程等方面的研究。E-mail: ctyangjunpeng21@mail.scut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    广东省住房和城乡建设厅研究项目(No.2021-K5-433936);2021年度交通运输行业重点科技项目(No.2021-MS1-022)。

Experimental study on drainage performance of reinforced improved soft rock residual soil under rainfall conditions

YANG Jun-peng1, DUAN Xiao-pei1, 2, ZHANG Qian1, LI Bo-wen1, WANG Yi-min1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510641, China; 2. Tianjin Municipal Engineering Design & Research Institute Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300380, China
  • Received:2025-03-06 Accepted:2025-04-29 Online:2026-03-17 Published:2026-03-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Guangdong Provincial Department of Housing and Urban-Rural Development Research Projects (2021-K5-433936) and the Scientific and Technological Key Projects in Transportation Industry 2021 (2021-MS1-022).

摘要: 为探究潮湿多雨气候条件下软岩残积土作为土工格栅加筋路堤填料的适用性,研究不同降雨条件下土工格栅加筋改良软岩残积土结构的排水性能,设计了一种大尺寸降雨入渗室内模型试验装置。试验研究了短时强降雨、短时极端降雨及长降雨历时条件下加筋改良软岩残积土结构的降雨入渗规律、渗透速度及不同排水设计方案的排水效率。结果表明:(1)不同降雨条件下加筋土结构降雨入渗均经历无压入渗、有压入渗和饱和入渗3个阶段,土工格栅加筋改良软岩残积土结构的降雨入渗能力较低,排水性能较差,饱和导水率约为0.28 mm/min。(2)内部设置级配碎石排水层明显改善加筋软岩残积土结构排水性能,其中,中砾碎石排水层排水效果最佳,细砾排水层次之,粗砾排水层相对较差,碎石排水层级配与填土粒度成分有较密切的相关性。(3)降雨强度分别为20、30、40 mm/h时,设置级配碎石排水层,结构底部排水量分别增大了21.7%、36.7%、34.6%;使用复合型排水土工格栅替代单向土工格栅时,结构底部排水量分别提升了7.40%、10.10%和4.89%,底部排水持续时间分别延长了1.5、2.5、4.5 h,级配碎石排水层与复合型排水土工格栅可有效改善改良软岩残积土加筋结构的排水性能。

关键词: 路基工程, 排水性能, 模型试验, 改良软岩残积土, 加筋土结构, 降雨, 级配

Abstract: To explore the suitability of soft rock residual soil as backfill material for geogrid-reinforced embankments under the humid and rainy climate region, this study investigated the drainage performance of geogrid-reinforced improved soft rock residual soil structures under different rainfall conditions. A large-scale rainfall infiltration model test device was designed to study the rainfall infiltration patterns, infiltration rates, and drainage efficiency of different drainage design schemes under conditions of short-term intense rainfall and short-term extreme rainfall and long-duration rainfall. The results show that: (1) The rainfall infiltration can be divided into three stages: unpressurized infiltration, pressurized infiltration, and saturated infiltration. These structures exhibit low infiltration capacity and poor drainage performance. The saturated hydraulic conductivity stabilizes around 0.28 mm/min. (2) Graded gravel drainage layers significantly improved the drainage performance of the soft shale residual soil. Medium gravel drainage layers perform best, followed by fine gravel, while coarse gravel perform relatively worst. The performance is closely related to the particle composition of the fill material. (3) At rainfall intensities of 20, 30 mm/h, and 40 mm/h, the graded gravel drainage layers increase drainage volume by 21.7%, 36.7%, and 34.6%, respectively. Replacing unidirectional geogrids with composite drainage geogrids increases drainage by 7.4%, 10.1%, and 4.89%, respectively. The drainage duration is extended by 1.5, 2.5 h, and 4.5 h. Both graded gravel drainage layers and composite drainage geogrids effectively improve the drainage performance of geogrid-reinforced soft rock residual soil structures.

Key words: subgrade engineering, drainage performance, model test, improved soft rock residual soil, reinforced soil structure, rainfall, gradation

中图分类号: U416.1
[1] 王家辉, 江洎洧, 孙逸飞, 王培清, 王保田, 陈亮, 周钺, 李超. 泥浆介质饱和下松散堆积体抗剪强度特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1313-1322.
[2] 宋林辉, 张静轩, 郭易龙, 杨天娇, 李志明, 梅国雄. 裂隙岩层中的地铁车站基底孔压实测与分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1364-1372.
[3] 蒋水华, 葛成民, 元志镕, 向晖, 胡伟, 黄发明. 基于等效渗透系数的多层土坡降雨入渗模型及可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1417-1430.
[4] 张昕, 张茹梦, 刘晨, 刘思宇, 郭博文. 循环荷载作用下螺旋锚桩动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1147-1159.
[5] 潘泓, 黄才穆, 骆冠勇, 彭斯格, 刘荣照, 曹洪. 富水复合砂层突涌破坏行为及孔压响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1171-1182.
[6] 刘红帅, 丁泊文, 宋东松, 李羿, 王永志. 柔性叠层剪切箱在干砂场地离心试验中的边界效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1219-1228.
[7] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[8] 陈树理, 郭伟, 任宇晓, 陈伟. 软土夹层地基上的互锁式L型沉箱稳定性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 49-60.
[9] 吴金标, 曾柳祁, 江益辉, 槐荣国, 曾程. 不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[10] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[11] 江文豪, 王浩, 廖光志, 陈滨华, . 时变降雨场景下双层非饱和土中水分一维瞬态渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2721-2737.
[12] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[13] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[14] 沈扬, 沈嘉毅, 梁晖, 樊科伟. 基于3D打印技术的仿真钙质砂三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2353-2362.
[15] 劳国峰, 阳军生, 谢亦朋, 汤冲, 许志鹏, . 基于骨架结构指标的连续级配颗粒土峰值抗剪强度模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2459-2470.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!