›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (S1): 225-229.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S1.038

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑渗流条件下开挖面失稳离心试验研究

陈仁朋1, 2,尹鑫晟1, 2,汤旅军3,陈云敏1, 2   

  1. 1. 浙江大学 软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310058; 2. 浙江大学 岩土工程研究所,浙江 杭州 310058; 3. 浙江省电力设计院,浙江 杭州 310012
  • 收稿日期:2015-03-07 出版日期:2015-07-11 发布日期:2018-06-14
  • 作者简介:陈仁朋,男,1972年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事交通岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金(No.20120101110027);国家自然科学基金(No.51225804,No.U1234204,No.41472244)。

Centrifugal model tests of tunneling face failure under seepage flow

CHEN Ren-peng1, 2, YIN Xin-sheng1, 2, TANG LÜ-jun3, CHEN Yun-min1, 2   

  1. 1. MOE Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 2. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310058, China; 3. Zhejiang Electric Power Design Institute, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310012, China
  • Received:2015-03-07 Online:2015-07-11 Published:2018-06-14

摘要: 当土压平衡盾构穿越高水位地层(如穿越江河)时,地下水与土舱之间的高水压差会产生过大的渗透力,导致开挖面失稳。为了研究渗流条件下开挖面失稳问题,开发了一套隧道离心模型试验装置,主要包括刚性模型箱、模型盾构、开挖面伺服加载系统、水位控制系统、储水箱。针对饱和砂质粉土地层,开展了一系列不同水位高度的稳态渗流开挖面失稳模型试验。结果显示,开挖面失稳过程中随着开挖面位移的增加,有效支护压力迅速下降;在达到最小值 之后缓慢回升并趋于稳定;极限有效支护压力 与水头压力 呈线性关系。

关键词: 盾构隧道, 开挖面稳定性, 稳态渗流, 离心机, 有效支护力

Abstract: When the earth pressure balanced shield is tunneling in the stratum with a high water table (for example, a tunnel constructed below the river by the shield), the hydraulic head difference between the ground and the shield’s chamber can produce seepage force acting on the tunnel face. The seepage force can lead to the failure of the tunneling face, in order to investigate the failure of the tunneling face considering the seepage flow. A device for the centrifugal model tests is developed, including: rigid model container, tunnel model, loading system, water table control system and water storage tank. The size of the rigid model container is 1 000 mm in length, 450 mm in width and 1 000 mm in height. Due to the symmetry, the tunnel model is made from a D-shape steel tube. The diameter of the tunnel model D is 100 mm the tunnel face is a D-shape aluminium plate with the drainage holes. The drainage holes allow the seepage water to flow into the tunnel. Loading system consists of a hydraulic actuator, a cylindrical loading rod, a linear variable differential transformer (LVDT) and control software. The loading system is used to fulfill the tunnel face retreating. The water table control system consist a flow pump, some hoses, a metal pipe with some holes and a solenoid valve. The water table control system allows keeping an invariant water table and steady seepage during the tests. Water storage tank is used to store seepage water. A series of the model tests with different water tables are conducted. The depth between the crown of the tunnel model and the water table are 1D, 2D and 3D. The depth of the overburden is 1D. The silty sands are used in the tests. The sands are collected from the beach on Qiantang River. A pressure cell is placed between the tunnel face and the loading rod. It is used to measure the support pressure. The armature of LVDT is connected to the loading rod. The LVDT is used to measure the horizontal displacement of the tunnel face. The results show that the effective support pressure decreased when the face plate is retreating. The effective support pressure increased slowly after reaching the minimal value. In the limit state, effective support pressure increased linearly with the hydraulic head .

Key words: shield tunneling, face stability, steady state seepage, centrifuge, effective support

中图分类号: 

  • U 452
[1] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[2] 尹鑫晟, 舒营, 梁禄钜, 张世民, . 考虑渗流的饱和粉土地层盾构开挖面稳定分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2005-2016.
[3] 张治国, 叶铜, 朱正国, PAN Y T, 吴钟腾, . 波浪作用下含气海床内盾构隧道水力及位移响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1557-1574.
[4] 钟小春, 黄思远, 槐荣国, 朱诚, 胡一康, 陈旭泉, . 基于浆液浮力试验的盾尾管片纵向上浮特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1615-1624.
[5] 王祖贤, 施成华, 龚琛杰, 曹成勇, 彭铸, 孙影杰, . 考虑横向性能的盾构隧道纵向非线性等效抗弯刚度计算模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1295-1308.
[6] 刘勇, 周怡晟, 索晓明, 樊浩博, 曹毅泽, 杜志田, . 盾构下穿高铁路基变形规律模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 941-951.
[7] 吴宏, 叶治, 张宇亭, 刘华北, . 穿越不同密实度饱和砂土地层的盾构隧道地震响应三维数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1204-1216.
[8] 闫志晓, 李雨润, 王东升, 王永志, . 覆水砂土场地中桥梁群桩基础地震响应离心试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 861-872.
[9] 张东明, 周烨璐, 黄宏伟, 张晋彰, . 物理信息双驱动的长距离盾构隧道结构纵向力学性态智能诊断方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2997-3010.
[10] 张志伟, 梁荣柱, 李忠超, 孙廉威, 沈雯, 吴文兵, . 盾尾非对称推力作用下盾构隧道纵向变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 88-98.
[11] 刘润, 尹瑞龙, 梁超, 陈广思. 黏土中超大直径钢管桩内侧摩阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 232-240.
[12] 黎春林. 盾构开挖面三维曲面体破坏模型 及支护力计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2092-2102.
[13] 王祖贤, 施成华, 龚琛杰, 曹成勇, 刘建文, 彭铸, . 邻近车站(工作井)基坑开挖对下卧 盾构隧道影响的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2176-2190.
[14] 杨建平, 王琛, 黄煜诚, 秦川, 陈卫忠, . 水下盾构隧道运营期管片应变增量变化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(8): 2253-2262.
[15] 王鸿振, 张春生, 黄维, 郭德昌, 蒋建群, . 超大型离心机基础自振特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1942-1950.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 魏 丽,柴寿喜,蔡宏洲,王晓燕,李 敏,石 茜. 麦秸秆加筋材料抗拉性能的实验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 128 -132 .
[2] 黄庆享,张 沛,董爱菊. 浅埋煤层地表厚砂土层“拱梁”结构模型研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2722 -2726 .
[3] 荆志东,刘俊新. 红层泥岩半刚性基床结构动态变形试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2116 -2121 .
[4] 刘争宏,廖燕宏,张玉守. 罗安达砂物理力学性质初探[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 121 -126 .
[5] 王登科,刘 建,尹光志,韦立德. 突出危险煤渗透性变化的影响因素探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3469 -3474 .
[6] 樊恒辉,高建恩,吴普特,娄宗科. 水泥基土壤固化剂固化土的物理化学作用[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3741 -3745 .
[7] 张成平,张顶立,骆建军,王梦恕,吴介普. 地铁车站下穿既有线隧道施工中的远程监测系统[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1861 -1866 .
[8] 王 军,曹 平,李江腾,刘业科. 降雨入渗对流变介质隧道边坡稳定性的分析[J]. , 2009, 30(7): 2158 -2162 .
[9] 张 渊,万志军,康建荣3,赵阳升. 温度、三轴应力条件下砂岩渗透率阶段特征分析[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 677 -683 .
[10] 张雪婵 ,龚晓南 ,尹序源 ,赵玉勃. 杭州庆春路过江隧道江南工作井监测分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 488 -0494 .