岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 2005-2016.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1160

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑渗流的饱和粉土地层盾构开挖面稳定分析

尹鑫晟1, 2, 3,舒营4,梁禄钜1,张世民1   

  1. 1. 浙大城市学院 工程学院,浙江 杭州 310015;2. 浙江省城市盾构隧道安全建造与智能养护重点实验室,浙江 杭州 310015; 3. 城市基础设施智能化浙江省工程研究中心,浙江 杭州 310015;4. 安徽理工大学 土木建筑学院,安徽 淮南 232001
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-26 接受日期:2022-11-23 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 张世民,男,1974年生,硕士,教授,主要从事岩土工程的研究。E-mail: zhangsm@zucc.edu.cn E-mail:yinxs@zucc.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:尹鑫晟,男,1989年生,博士,副教授,主要从事盾构隧道研究。
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省教育厅科研计划项目(No.Y201839147);浙江省自然科学基金项目(No.LY21E080004);杭州市科技局规划项目(No.2020ZDSJ0639);浙江省住建厅科研项目(No.2020K074)。

Stability analysis of shield excavation surface in saturated silt strata considering seepage

YIN Xin-sheng1, 2, 3, SHU Ying4, LIANG Lu-ju1, ZHANG Shi-min1   

  1. 1. School of Engineering, Hangzhou City University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China; 2. Zhejiang Provincial Key Laboratory for Safety Construction and Intelligent Maintenance of Urban Shield Tunnels, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China; 3. Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Intelligent Urban Infrastructure, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310015, China; 4. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China
  • Received:2022-07-26 Accepted:2022-11-23 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Program of Zhejiang Provincial Education Department (Y201839147), the Natural Science Foundation Project of Zhejiang (LY21E080004), the Planning Project of Hangzhou Science and Technology Bureau (2020ZDSJ0639) and the Scientific Research Project of Zhejiang Provincial Department of Housing and Construction (2020K074).

摘要: 土压平衡盾构在穿越高水位钱塘江粉土地层时,地下水与密封舱之间的高水压差会产生过大的指向开挖面的渗透力。钱塘江粉土黏聚力低,开挖面自立性差,且土体模量小,过大的渗透力会使土体产生更大的变形,导致开挖面失稳。数值模拟中合理选取土的本构关系与模型参数,对计算结果的可靠性十分重要。为了研究渗流条件下开挖面稳定性问题,基于室内试验,对钱塘江粉土的摩尔−库仑本构模型和摩尔−库仑应变软化本构模型参数进行研究。研究发现,钱塘江粉土的剪应变是轴向应变的1.5倍;根据三轴卸荷试验得到应变软化内摩擦角和剪应变的关系,当剪应变为4.7%时内摩擦角达到峰值为25º,剪应变为7.4%时内摩擦角达到残余值为21º,剪应变在4.7%~7.4%之间时,内摩擦角线性减小。采用有限差分软件建立39组三维分析模型,通过与离心机试验的极限支护压力和地表沉降对比发现,相同水位情况下,摩尔−库仑应变软化本构模型计算的极限支护压力与离心机试验的最小误差为3.1%,最大地表沉降的误差为5.67%。证明了在钱塘江粉土地层中使用摩尔−库仑应变软化本构模型的可行性及模型参数的可靠性。

关键词: 数值模拟, 开挖面稳定性, 渗流, 本构模型, 钱塘江粉土

Abstract: When the earth pressure balance shield crosses the high water-level Qiantang River silt layer, the high water pressure difference between the groundwater and the sealing chamber will generate excessive infiltration force toward the excavation surface. The excessive infiltration force will cause large deformation of the soil and thus leading to destabilization of the excavation surface because of the low cohesion of Qiantang River silt, poor self-supporting of the excavation surface and small modulus of the soil. The reasonable selection of soil constitutive relationship and model parameters in numerical simulations are very important for the reliability of numerical results. In order to study the stability of the excavation surface under seepage conditions, the parameters of the Mohr-Coulomb model and its strain-softening model of the Qiantang River silt were investigated based on laboratory tests. It was found that the shear strain of the Qiantang River silt was 1.5 times of the axial strain. According to the triaxial unloading test, the relationship between the strain softening internal friction angle and the shear strain is obtained. The internal friction angle reaches a peak value of 25º when the shear strain is 4.7%; the internal friction angle reaches a residual value of 21º when the shear strain is 7.4%; the internal friction angle decreases linearly when the shear strain is between 4.7% and 7.4%. Then the finite difference method was used to establish 39 groups of three-dimensional analytical models. By comparing with the ultimate support force and surface settlement of the centrifuge test, it was found that under the same water level, the minimum error between the ultimate support pressure calculated by the Mohr-Coulomb strain-softening model and the centrifuge test was 3.1%, and the error of the maximum surface settlement was 5.67%. It proves the feasibility of the Mohr-Coulomb strain-softening model and the reliability of the model parameters in the Qiantang River silt formation.

Key words: numerical simulation, excavation surface stability, seepage, constitutive model, Qiantang River silt

中图分类号: 

  • U45
[1] 黄生根, 张义, 霍昊, 陈常青. 软土地区深基坑支护工程格构柱变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(增刊): 533-538.
[2] 王凯, 付强, 徐超, 艾子博, 李丹, 王磊, 舒龙勇, . 原生煤岩组合体界面力学效应数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(增刊): 623-633.
[3] 乔亚飞, 闫凯, 赵腾腾, 丁文其, . 软土地区超深圆形竖井的坑底隆起特性与机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2707-2716.
[4] 蔚立元, 杨瀚清, 王晓琳, 刘日成, 王蓥森. 循环剪切作用下三维粗糙裂隙非线性渗流特性数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2757-2766.
[5] 余俊, 李东凯, 和振, 张志中. 带有两端防渗墙坝基的各向异性渗流解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2381-2388.
[6] 张坤勇, 张梦, 孙斌, 李福东, 简永洲, . 考虑时空效应的软土狭长型深基坑地连墙变形计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2389-2399.
[7] 刘东东, 魏立新, 徐国元, 项彦勇, . 基于裂隙连续方法的三维裂隙岩体渗流传热数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2143-2150.
[8] 甘磊, 刘玉, 张宗亮, 沈振中, 马洪影, . 岩体裂隙粗糙度表征及其对裂隙渗流特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1585-1592.
[9] 季雨坤, 王钦科, 赵国良, 张健, 马建林, . 斜坡上嵌岩抗拔桩竖向承载变形特性模型试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1604-1614.
[10] 王旭, 董梅, 孔梦悦, 邓云鹏, 徐日庆, 龚晓南, . 基于扩散波近似方程的降雨边界处理的改进[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1761-1770.
[11] 马国良, 陈曦, 范超男, 葛少成. 不同水力荷载路径下煤体微观渗流特征及宏观破坏研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1779-1788.
[12] 孙彦晓, 刘松玉, 童立元, 王峻, 崔佳, 李世龙, 李敏, . 长江漫滩区明挖隧道基坑降承压水优化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1800-1810.
[13] 贾科敏, 许成顺, 杜修力, 张小玲, 宋佳, 苏卓林, . 可液化倾斜场地的侧向扩展机制分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1837-1848.
[14] 范金洋, 唐璐宣, 陈结, 杨镇宇, 姜德义, . 基于硬化参量的盐岩蠕变疲劳本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1271-1282.
[15] 黄娟, 和振, 余俊, 杨鑫歆. 渗透各向异性圆形围堰稳态渗流场解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1035-1043.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .