›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 1179-1186.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.04.033

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑径流影响的滑坡降雨入渗二维有限元模拟及应用

田东方1,郑 宏2,刘德富3   

  1. 1. 三峡大学 水利与环境学院,湖北 宜昌 443002;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 3. 湖北工业大学 资源与环境工程学院,湖北 武汉 430068
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-14 出版日期:2016-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:田东方,男,1979年生,博士研究生,副教授,主要从事边坡渗流,稳定性数值模拟方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然基金青年项目(No. 41302275)。

2D FEM numerical simulation of rainfall infiltration for landslide with considering runoff effect and its application

TIAN Dong-fang1,ZHENG Hong2,LIU De-fu3   

  1. 1. College of Hydraulic & Environmental Engineering, China Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei 443002, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. College of Resources and Environmental Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China
  • Received:2014-07-14 Online:2016-04-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) for Youth (41302275).

摘要: 降雨是滑坡失稳的常见诱发因素之一,现有数值模拟方法由于不能考虑来自基岩边坡的径流对滑体渗流的补给而低估了真实的降雨入渗水量,导致在评价降雨对滑坡稳定性特别是深层滑动影响时存在一定不足。以Richards方程和有限元法为基础,忽略降雨对渗透性极低的滑床和滑带的影响,将滑坡渗流计算域缩小为滑体,以避免因滑体与滑床(滑带)渗透性差异巨大引起的数值计算困难;依据基岩边坡水平长度和滑体降雨入渗边界饱和情况,修正降雨入渗边界,实现了考虑径流补给的滑坡降雨入渗简化数值模拟。算例表明,该方法所得渗流场更加符合实际情况。以三峡库区某滑坡为例,模拟了2006年10月~2009年12月间滑坡在库水升降和降雨条件下的渗流场和安全系数的演化过程;计算结果表明,考虑径流补给时滑坡后部的渗流场饱和区域明显较大,稳定系数降低较多,与位移监测资料显示的佐证较为吻合;若不考虑径流补给,则降雨对滑坡稳定性影响不大。

关键词: 降雨入渗, 有限元, 边坡稳定性, 数值模拟, 径流影响

Abstract: Rainfall is one of the most critical factors that results in the landslide instability. However, the influence of runoff from bedrock slope on infiltration has not been considered by the existing numerical methods so that unfavorable infiltration is underestimated and the stability of landslide, especially those deep slides, is overestimated. In this paper, based on Richards’s equation and FEM, a 2D simplified numerical method is proposed, which can consider the influence of runoff supply on the infiltration of sliding mass. In the proposed method, calculation domain only contains sliding mass in order to avoid the numerical problems induced by the large difference between the permeability coefficients of landslide body and landslide bed (or slide zone), and rainfall boundaries are corrected according to the horizontal length of bedrock slope and saturation of slope surface. The seepage field and stability of an existing landslide in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area are simulated under the water level fluctuation of reservoir and the rainfall from Oct., 2006 to Dec., 2009. It is shown that the saturated zone in the trailing edge of landslide becomes significantly enlarged when the runoff supply is considered, and thus the stability decreases more significantly, which is consistent with the data from the displacement monitoring. In addition, rainfall trivially influences the stability of landslide if the runoff supply is not taken into account.

Key words: rainfall infiltration, finite elements, slope stability, numerical simulation, influence of runoff

中图分类号: 

  • TU 42

[1] 刘泉声, 王栋, 朱元广, 杨战标, 伯音, . 支持向量回归算法在地应力场反演中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 319-328.
[2] 王翔南, 郝青硕, 喻葭临, 于玉贞, 吕禾. 基于扩展有限元法的大坝面板脱空三维模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 329-336.
[3] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[4] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[5] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[6] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[7] 杨峰, 何诗华, 吴遥杰, 计丽艳, 罗静静, 阳军生. 非均质黏土地层隧道开挖面稳定运动 单元上限有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1412-1419.
[8] 苏杰, 周正华, 李小军, 董青, 李玉萍, 陈柳. 基于偏振特性的下孔法剪切波到时判别问题探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1420-1428.
[9] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[10] 江南, 黄林, 冯君, 张圣亮, 王铎, . 铁路悬索桥隧道式锚碇设计计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[11] 杨高升, 白冰, 姚晓亮, . 高含冰量冻土路基融化固结规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1010-1018.
[12] 马秋峰, 秦跃平, 周天白, 杨小彬. 岩石剪切断裂面接触算法的开发与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1074-1085.
[13] 李康, 王威, 杨典森, 陈卫忠, 亓宪寅, 谭彩. 周期振荡法在低渗透测量中的应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1086-1094.
[14] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[15] 孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的 自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!