›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (5): 1475-1485.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.05.032

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

砂-黏土双层地基极限承载力的数值研究

郑 刚1, 2,周海祚1, 2,程雪松1, 2,刘景锦1, 2,郑帅群1, 2   

  1. 1.天津大学 建筑工程学院,天津 300072;2.天津大学 滨海土木工程结构与安全教育部重点实验室,天津 300072
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-17 出版日期:2016-05-10 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 周海祚,男,1987生,博士研究生。主要从事地基处理方面的研究。Email: zhzrobby@163.com E-mail:zhenggang1967@163.com
  • 作者简介:郑刚,男,1967年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,从事土力学及岩土工程的教学与科研工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51378345)。

Numerical analysis of the ultimate bearing capacity of the layered soil foundation with sand overlying clay

ZHENG Gang1, 2, ZHOU Hai-zuo1, 2, CHENG Xue-song1, 2, LIU Jing-jin1, 2, ZHENG Shuai-qun1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Coast Civil Structure Safety of Ministry of Education, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
  • Received:2014-07-17 Online:2016-05-10 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51378345).

摘要: 在实际工程中,常见天然的或通过人工换填形成的上部砂土、下部黏土的层状地基,目前关于这种双层地基极限承载力和破坏机制研究还不够深入。通过有限差分法建立双层地基数值模型,分析基底粗糙程度、砂土剪胀角和超载对地基破坏模式及极限承载力的影响,并根据有限差分法计算结果对强度加权平均法、应力扩散法和冲剪破坏法等现有实用计算方法的估算正确性进行评价。研究结果表明,基底粗糙程度对极限承载力的影响随着砂土内摩擦角的增大而减小;当剪胀角较小时,剪胀角变化对承载力的影响更为明显;当下层黏土强度较小时,超载的作用更明显。强度加权平均法由于低估破坏面影响深度导致砂土层权重较大,计算结果偏大;应力扩散法忽略了砂土剪切强度,在砂土层较厚时出现低估;冲剪破坏法由于可较为精确地计算砂土破坏面上抗剪强度和被动土压力,是3种实用方法中计算最准确的,当砂土厚度和黏土强度较大时,建议按太沙基经验公式对下卧黏土进行局部剪切破坏修正后确定极限承载力。

关键词: 双层地基, 极限承载力, 冲剪破坏法, 应力扩散法

Abstract: In engineering practice, a layered soil with sand overlying clay is often witnessed in naturally deposited or artificially backfilled grounds. However, limit insight has been gained into the failure mechanism and bearing capacity of two-layer soil. A numerical model on the basis of a finite difference method is developed for studying the influences of the footing roughness, dilation angle and surcharge on the failure mode and ultimate bearing capacity of the soil foundation. Based on the numerical results, the existing practical methods are evaluated, including the weighted average method, the load spreading method and the punching shear method. Our results indicate that the influence of the footing roughness on the bearing capacity decreases with the increase of the friction angle of soil. The dilation angle has remarkable effect on ultimate load when the dilation angle is small. Besides, the influence of surcharge becomes significant for low-strength clay. The weighted average method overestimates the bearing capacity, since it overestimates the weight of the strength of sand due to a conservative prediction of the depth of the failure slip. The load spreading method is considered to underestimate the bearing capacity when the depth of sand is large due to neglecting the shearing resistance of sand. The punching shear method, in which the vertical side sand block is utilized and shearing resistance of sand is taken into account, gives a reasonable solution for small sand depth and low-strength clay. In addition, the accuracy of the calculation can be improved if the local shear failure in the clay subgrade is taken into account.

Key words: two-layer soil, ultimate bearing capacity, punching shear method, load spreading method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470

[1] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[3] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[4] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[5] 李红坡, 陈征, 冯健雪, 蒙宇涵, 梅国雄, . 双层地基水平排水砂垫层位置优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 437-444.
[6] 穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘 旸, 刘 泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[7] 王冬勇, 陈曦, 于玉贞, 吕彦楠, . 基于二阶锥规划有限元增量加载法的条形浅基础极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[8] 冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[9] 宗钟凌,鲁先龙,李青松,. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[10] 尹君凡,雷 勇,陈秋南,刘一新,邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[11] 曹文贵,谭建辉,胡卫东, . 水平加筋地基极限承载力的极限上限分析法[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[12] 李传勋,董兴泉,金丹丹,王玉林,. 考虑起始坡降双层地基的大应变非线性固结[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1877-1884.
[13] 李 泽,刘 毅,周 宇,王均星,. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
[14] 孔纲强,彭怀风,朱 希,顾红伟,周立朵,. 水平荷载下纵截面异形桩承载特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 229-236.
[15] 雷 勇,尹君凡,陈秋南,杨 威,. 基于极限分析法的溶洞顶板极限承载力研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1926-1932.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!