岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 1049-1058.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1978

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

地连墙-重力式复合锚碇基础承载性能试验研究

罗林阁1,崔立川2,石海洋3,过 超3,易绍平2   

  1. 1. 广东南粤交投清云高速管理中心,广东 广州 510199;2. 中交公路规划设计院有限公司,北京 100088; 3. 中交公路长大桥建设国家工程研究中心有限公司,北京 100088
  • 收稿日期:2017-09-30 出版日期:2019-03-11 发布日期:2019-04-04
  • 作者简介:罗林阁,男,1967年生,本科,高级工程师,主要从事桥梁建设方面的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划专项资助(No.2018YFC0809600);贵州省科技计划项目资助(No.[2016]2013)。

Experimental study of bearing capacity of underground diaphragm wall-gravity anchorage composite foundation

LUO Lin-ge1, CUI Li-chuan2, SHI Hai-yang3, GUO Chao3, YI Shao-ping2   

  1. 1. Qingyun Highway Management Center of Guangdong Nanyue Transportation Investment & Construction Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510199, China; 2. China Communication Highway Planning and Design Institute, Beijing 100088, China; 3. CCCC Highway Bridges National Engineering Research Centre Co., Ltd., Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2017-09-30 Online:2019-03-11 Published:2019-04-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China(2018YFC0809600) and Guizhou Science and Technology Project([2016]2013).

摘要: 为研究地连墙?重力式复合锚碇基础底板以下地连墙嵌固作用对其承载性能的影响,依托西江特大桥清远侧新型地连墙锚碇设计方案,分别开展相同试验条件下地连墙?重力式复合锚碇基础与不考虑地连墙嵌固效应的常规锚碇基础两组物理模型试验,对荷载与位移关系、基底土压力分布及荷载分配规律进行分析。结果表明:与常规锚碇相比,由于地连墙嵌入深部中分化基岩,地连墙?重力式复合锚碇基础可充分发挥嵌岩地连墙强度及深层岩体承载能力,在竖向荷载和水平荷载作用下,地连墙?重力式复合锚碇基础竖向位移和水平位移均明显小于无嵌岩地连墙的常规锚碇基础,其中设计缆力条件下可降低水平位移量75%左右,表明嵌岩地连墙结构有效提高了锚碇基础承载性能和安全储备。由土压力及荷载分配规律可知,上部竖向荷载通过地连墙结构传递到深部基岩,有效分担了基础底板土体压应力,进而降低地基土体附加应力和基础沉降量。综合表明,当地连墙结构嵌入深部强度较好的基岩时,采用地连墙作为基坑围护结构的锚碇基础设计可考虑地连墙嵌固作用对其承载力的贡献。

关键词: 地连墙?重力式复合锚碇, 模型试验, 嵌固作用, 荷载分配

Abstract: To study the influence of the embedding action of diaphragm wall below the bottom of diaphragm wall-gravity anchorage composite foundation on its bearing capacity, two sets of physical model tests of the underground diaphragm wall-anchor combined foundation and the conventional anchor foundation without considering the embedding effect of diaphragm wall-were carried out under the same conditions, relying on the design scheme of new diaphragm wall anchorage at Qingyuan side of Xijiang Super Bridge. The relationship between load and displacement, the distribution of soil pressure and the load distribution are analyzed. The results show that the vertical displacement and horizontal displacement of the combined anchor foundation are obviously smaller than that of the conventional anchor foundation due to the consolidation and fixed effect of the diaphragm wall under the vertical and horizontal loads. Compared with the conventional anchorage, diaphragm wall-gravity type composite anchorage foundation can make full use of diaphragm strength embedded into rock and bearing capacity of deep rock mass. The horizontal displacement can be reduced by about 75% under the design of cable force, which effectively improve the bearing and safety performance. The vertical load can transfer from the ground wall structure to the deep bedrock, which can share the soil pressure on the foundation base, and reduce additional stress and settlement, according to the soil pressure and load distribution law. The comprehensive analysis shows that the contribution for bearing capacity of ground diaphragm wall designed as the anchorage foundation of the retaining structure can be considered in design, when the bottom of underground diaphragm wall is embedded into bedrock.

Key words: underground diaphragm wall-anchor combined foundation, model experiment, fixed effect, load distribution

中图分类号: 

  • TU 476+.3
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[3] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[4] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[5] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[6] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[7] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[8] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[9] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[10] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[11] 宋丁豹, 蒲诃夫, 陈保国, 孟庆达, . 高填方减载式刚性涵洞受力特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 823-830.
[12] 米博, 项彦勇, . 砂土地层浅埋盾构隧道开挖渗流稳定性的 模型试验和计算研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 837-848.
[13] 侯公羽, 胡涛, 李子祥, 谢冰冰, 肖海林, 周天赐, . 基于分布式光纤技术的采动影响下覆岩 变形演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 970-979.
[14] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[15] 陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性 足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!