岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (3): 1039-1048.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.2045

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

既有−新增排桩双层支挡结构开挖模型试验研究

唐德琪1, 2,俞 峰1, 2,陈奕天1, 2,刘念武1, 2   

  1. 1. 浙江理工大学 基础结构技术研究所,浙江 杭州 310018;2. 浙江省装配式混凝土工业化建筑工程技术研究中心,浙江 杭州 310018
  • 收稿日期:2017-10-13 出版日期:2019-03-11 发布日期:2019-04-04
  • 通讯作者: 俞峰,男,1976年生,博士,教授,主要从事基础工程的教学与研究工作。E-mail: pokfulam@zstu.edu.cn E-mail:1749569869@qq.com
  • 作者简介:唐德琪,男,1993年生,硕士研究生,主要从事基坑支挡结构的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    浙江省自然科学基金重点项目(No.LZ17E080002);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.41472284);浙江理工大学“521”人才计划;浙江省公益性技术应用研究计划项目(No.2016C33020)

Model excavation tests on double layered retaining structure composed of existing and supplementary soldier piles

TANG De-qi1, 2, YU Feng1, 2, CHEN Yi-tian1, 2, LIU Nian-wu1, 2   

  1. 1. Institute of Foundation and Structure Technologies, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China; 2. Zhejiang Provincial Engineering and Technology Research Center of Assembly-Concrete Industrialized Buildings, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310018, China
  • Received:2017-10-13 Online:2019-03-11 Published:2019-04-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Key Project of Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation(LZ17E080002), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41472284), Zhejiang Sci-Tech University's "521" Talent Program and the Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project of Zhejiang(2016C33020).

摘要: 在既有地下室以下增设地下空间,常面临既有支护桩与新增支护桩构成双层支挡结构的开挖工况,这是传统开挖设计方法未涉及的新问题。通过大比尺模型试验,以内外双层支护桩排间距为主要参数,研究其对支护结构性能演变、排间土压力的影响。试验结果表明,随排间距减小,新增支护桩位移与弯矩逐渐增大,由嵌固作用转变为主要受力结构。开挖至既有支护桩失效退出工作后,新增支护桩位移与弯矩突增,最大弯矩点下移。既有支护桩背单位土压力随开挖逐渐减小,达到主动极限状态后主动土压力随排间距增大而增大,并接近朗肯主动土压力分布线。通过各试验桩背主动土压力数据分析拟合,建立了以排间距、土体内摩擦角、桩土摩擦角为参数并考虑土拱效应的既有支护桩背主动土压力预测方法。

关键词: 地下增层, 模型试验, 支挡结构, 位移, 内力, 土压力

Abstract: Underground space supplement by excavation beneath constructed basement usually encounters the situation that existing and newly-created retaining piles form a double layered retaining structure. This is a new topic that traditional excavation design methods have not involved. This study uses large-scale model tests to investigate the influence of row spacing between the two pile layers on the pile displacement, the pile force and the earth pressure acting on the front-row piles. The analyses show that as the row spacing decreases, both the displacement and the bending moment decrease in the existing piles but increase in the supplementary piles, making the supplementary piles be the principal bearing elements. After the existing retaining piles end service, an abrupt increase in the displacement and bending moment of the supplementary piles is detected while the location of the maximum bending moment is shifted to be deeper. The unit earth pressure imposed on the existing piles gradually decreases as excavation proceeds. When the active limit state is reached, the active earth pressure approaches the distribution mode of the Rankine active earth pressure and its magnitude increases with increasing row spacing. Through the analysis and fitting of the active earth pressure data of each test, a prediction method for the active earth pressure on the existing piles is established with considerations of the spacing of pile rows, the soil friction angle, the pile-soil interface friction angle as well as the soil arching effect.

Key words: underground storey supplement, model test, retaining structure, displacement, internal force, earth pressure

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 赵久彬, 刘元雪, 何少其, 杨骏堂, 柏准, . 三峡库区阶跃变形滑坡水平位移与降雨量 数学统计模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 305-311.
[3] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[4] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[5] 刘争宏, 张龙, 郑建国, 张炜, 于永堂, . 滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2504-2515.
[6] 陈建功, 杨扬, 陈彦含, 陈小兵. 考虑抗拉强度的黏性填土挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1829-1835.
[7] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[8] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[9] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 董亮, ABDOULKADER M S. 粗颗粒土的静止土压力系数非线性分析与计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[10] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[11] 王立安, 赵建昌, 余云燕, . 瑞利波在非均匀饱和地基中的传播特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1983-1990.
[12] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[13] 蒲诃夫, 潘友富, KHOTEJA Dibangar, 周洋. 絮凝-水平真空两段式脱水法处理高 含水率疏浚淤泥模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1502-1509.
[14] 黄福云, 陈汉伦, 董锐, 单玉麟. 水平低周往复位移下单桩-土相互作用试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1625-1634.
[15] 史永跃, 王奎华, 董天文, 马显春, 黄永威. 真空负压静力试桩方法关键技术试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1699-1708.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!