岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (8): 2636-2646.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1794

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

白垩系饱和冻结砂岩蠕变试验及本构模型研究

魏尧1,杨更社1,申艳军1,明锋2,梁博1   

  1. 1. 西安科技大学 建筑与土木工程学院,陕西 西安 710054; 2. 中国科学院寒区旱区环境与工程研究所 冻土工程国家重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-16 修回日期:2020-03-04 出版日期:2020-08-14 发布日期:2020-10-17
  • 作者简介:魏尧,男,1989年生,博士研究生,主要从事寒区岩石冻融损伤试验与理论分析。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 51774231,No. 41702339);冻土工程国家重点实验室开放课题(No. SKLFSE201713)。

Creep test and constitutive model of cretaceous saturated frozen sandstone

WEI Yao1, YANG Geng-she1, SHEN Yan-jun1, MING Feng2, LIANG Bo1   

  1. 1. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering, Cold and Arid Regions Environmental and Engineering Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2019-09-16 Revised:2020-03-04 Online:2020-08-14 Published:2020-10-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51774231,41702339)and the Open Project of State Key Laboratory of Frozen Soil Engineering (SKLFSE201713).

摘要: 冻结法作为穿越富水软岩地层的重要施工方法,冻结壁的长期稳定性对于工程安全有着至关重要的作用。蠕变破坏是诱发冻结壁变形的显著特点之一,对研究冻结岩石蠕变的特性有重要的理论和工程意义。以白垩系饱和冻结砂岩为研究对象,开展–10 ℃低温冻结条件下,不同围压(0、2、4、6 MPa)的三轴蠕变力学试验。分析了饱和冻结砂岩蠕变变形,根据现有黏弹塑性模型开展了参数辨识并探究蠕变参数的变化规律,基于此提出考虑温度及损伤效应的蠕变本构模型。研究结果表明:低温冻结削弱蠕变过程中颗粒间的相互胶结力,使其蠕变特征明显;而围压却在一定程度上抑制饱和冻结砂岩内部损伤的发展,导致稳态蠕变速率随围压的升高出现明显的下降趋势。随围压的增加饱和冻结砂岩的蠕变破坏形态呈现出从剪切破坏到张拉破坏再到局部塑形硬化破坏的变化过程。在黏弹塑性模型的基础上,总结蠕变参数 、 和 随荷载的增加呈现先增后减的趋势,拐点为屈服应力;而参数 在大于屈服应力后出现并呈现先增后减的趋势。结合冻结岩石蠕变数据对定义的应力-低温耦合蠕变本构模型进行了参数辨识,并将该模型的计算结果与蠕变试验数据对比,验证所建立非线性模型的正确性与合理性。

关键词: 白垩系冻结砂岩, 蠕变, 非线性, 参数辨识

Abstract: The freezing method is an important construction method for crossing water-rich soft rock formations. The long-term stability of the frozen wall plays an important role in engineering safety. Creep damage is one of the remarkable features of induced deformation of frozen walls. It is of great theoretical and engineering significance to study the characteristics of frozen rock creep. Taking the cretaceous saturated frozen sandstone as the research object, triaxial creep mechanical tests with different confining pressures (0, 2, 4 and 6 MPa) were carried out under the low temperature freezing condition of –10℃. The creep deformation of saturated frozen sandstone was analyzed. According to the existing viscoelastic-plastic model, the parameter identification was carried out and the variation law of creep parameters was studied. A creep constitutive model considering temperature and damage effect was then proposed. The results show that the low temperature freezing weakens the mutual cementation force between the particles during the creep process, and the creep characteristics are obvious. However, the confining pressure inhibits the development of the internal damage of the saturated frozen sandstone to some extent, resulting in the steady creep rate. The increase in confining pressure shows a significant downward trend. With the increase of confining pressure, the creep failure morphology of saturated frozen sandstone shows a change process from shear failure to tensile failure to local shape hardening failure. On the basis of the viscoelastic model, the creep parameters , and are increased first and then decreased with the increase of the load, and the inflection point is the yield stress. The parameter appears after the yield stress and undergoes increase to decrease. Combined with the frozen rock creep data, the parameters of the stress and low temperature coupled creep constitutive model are identified, and the numerical results of the model are compared with the creep experimental data to verify the correctness and rationality of the established nonlinear model.

Key words: cretaceous frozen sandstone, creep, nonlinear, parameter identification

中图分类号: 

  • TU 45
[1] 李福林, 杨健, 刘卫群, 范振华, 杨玉贵, . 单轴压缩条件下泥岩加载速率变化效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 369-378.
[2] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣. 孔隙水压力对锯齿状结构面剪切蠕变特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2901-2912.
[3] 李列列, 管俊峰, 肖明砾, 刘海朝, 唐克东, . 一种横观各向同性岩体蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2922-2930.
[4] 黄智刚, 左清军, 吴立, 陈福榜, 胡圣松, 朱盛, . 水岩作用下泥质板岩软化非线性机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2931-2942.
[5] 陈国兴, 李磊, 丁杰发, 赵凯, . 巨厚沉积土夹火山岩场地非线性地震反应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3056-3065.
[6] 胡安峰, 周禹杉, 陈缘, 夏长青, 谢康和, . 结构性土一维非线性大应变固结半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2583-2591.
[7] 刘家顺, 靖洪文, 孟波, 王来贵, 张向东, 杨建军, . 含水条件下弱胶结软岩蠕变特性 及分数阶蠕变模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2609-2618.
[8] 朱剑锋, 徐日庆, 罗战友, 潘斌杰, 饶春义, . 考虑固化剂掺量影响的镁质水泥固化土 非线性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2224-2232.
[9] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[10] 喻昭晟, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 董亮, ABDOULKADER M S. 粗颗粒土的静止土压力系数非线性分析与计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1923-1932.
[11] 李佳龙, 李钢, 于龙. 隔离非线性平面应变单元模型及其 在Drucker-Prager模型中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1492-1501.
[12] 江留慧, 李传勋, 杨怡青, 张锐. 变荷载下双层地基一维非线性固结近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1583-1590.
[13] 陈琼, 崔德山, 王菁莪, 刘清秉. 不同固结状态下黄土坡滑坡滑 带土的蠕变试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1635-1642.
[14] 徐毅青, 邓绍玉, 葛琦. 锚索预应力初期与长期损失的预测模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1663-1669.
[15] 韩超, 庞德朋, 李德建. 砂岩分级加卸载蠕变试验过程能量演化分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1179-1188.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[2] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[3] 胡 伟,黄 义,刘增荣. 循环荷载下饱和黄土不排水强度退化规律试验与理论研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2996 -3000 .
[4] 贾宇峰,迟世春,林 皋. 考虑颗粒破碎影响的粗粒土本构模型[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3261 -3266 .
[5] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[6] 王 飞,王 媛,倪小东. 渗流场随机性的随机有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3539 -3542 .
[7] 陈 锋,杨海军,杨春和. 盐岩储气库注气排卤期剩余可排卤水分析[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3602 -3606 .
[8] 于 丽,王明年,房敦敏,陈炜韬. 岩质围岩施工阶段亚级分级的数量化理论研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3846 -3850 .
[9] 兰四清,王玉林,谢康和. 径向双侧壁排水软土地基固结数学模型及解析解[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3871 -3875 .
[10] 胡晓军,谭晓惠. 弹性抗滑桩全桩内力计算的地基反力荷载法[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 299 -303 .