基于纳米划痕试验的砂岩结构面宏−微观摩擦系数关系研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0726

岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (4): 1022-1034.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0726

基于纳米划痕试验的砂岩结构面宏−微观摩擦系数关系研究

郑爽¹，雍睿^{1, 2}，杜时贵^{1, 2}，何智海¹，钟祯¹，章莹莹²，眭素刚³

1. 绍兴文理学院土木工程学院，浙江绍兴 312000；2. 宁波大学岩石力学研究所，浙江宁波 315211； 3. 中国有色金属工业昆明勘察设计研究院有限公司，云南昆明 650000

收稿日期:2022-05-17 接受日期:2022-08-15 出版日期:2023-04-18 发布日期:2023-04-28
通讯作者: 雍睿，男，1987年生，博士，研究员，主要从事结构面力学性质及其工程应用方面的研究工作。E-mail: yongrui@nbu.edu.cn E-mail:623335924@qq.com
作者简介:郑爽，男，1997年生，硕士研究生，主要从事矿山边坡工程方面的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No.42177117）；浙江省岩石力学与地质灾害重点实验室开放研究基金（No.ZJRMG-2018-Y-03）。

Relationship between macro and micro friction coefficients of sandstone structural surface based on nano-scratch test

ZHENG Shuang¹, YONG Rui^{1, 2}, DU Shi-gui^{1, 2}, HE Zhi-hai¹, ZHONG Zhen¹, ZHANG Ying-ying², SUI Su-gang³

1. School of Civil Engineering, Shaoxing University, Shaoxing, Zhejiang 312000, China; 2. Rock Mechanics Institute, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang 315211, China; 3. Kunming Prospecting Design Institute of China Nonferrous Metals Industry, Kunming, Yunnan 650000, China

Received:2022-05-17 Accepted:2022-08-15 Online:2023-04-18 Published:2023-04-28
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42177117) and the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Rock Mechanics and Geohazards of Zhejiang Province (ZJRMG-2018-Y-03).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基本摩擦系数是影响岩体结构面抗剪强度的重要参数。常规室内试验方法所确定的基本摩擦系数往往受矿物成分、温度等因素影响，为系统揭示结构面的基本摩擦性质，分别研究了砂岩宏观摩擦系数与微观摩擦系数，并建立了两者的关系。首先，通过X射线衍射、纳米压痕试验确定砂岩矿物组分与力学参数。其次，采用倾斜试验、直剪试验开展摩擦系数的宏观尺度研究，对规格为10 cm×10 cm×5 cm的平直结构面试样开展直剪试验，分别施加1、2、3、8、12 MPa的恒定法向应力，研究表明，摩擦系数随法向应力增加呈对数降低趋势，随剪切速率增加呈对数增长趋势。再次，采用纳米划痕试验开展摩擦系数的微观尺度研究，研究表明，低荷载条件下，长石矿物摩擦系数随荷载增加表现出先降低后保持不变的趋势，石英矿物摩擦系数随荷载增加表现出先降低后增加的趋势；此外，随着剪切速率的增加，两种矿物的摩擦系数在低荷载条件下呈增长的趋势，在高荷载条件下基本保持稳定。最后，基于摩擦系数的宏−微观摩擦系数试验结果，采用速度−状态摩擦（RSF）定律建立红砂岩基本摩擦系数与矿物摩擦系数的线性回归方程，并通过直剪试验验证了该经验关系的可靠性，其误差范围为0.17%～0.91%。研究结果为基本摩擦系数的测定与取值提供了新思路。

关键词: 摩擦系数, 微观尺度, 直剪试验, 纳米划痕, RSF定律

Abstract: Basic friction coefficients are important parameters affecting the shear strength of structural surface in rock masses. The basic friction coefficient determined by conventional laboratory test methods is influenced by mineral composition, temperature, and other factors. To systematically reveal the basic frictional properties of structural surfaces, the macro and micro friction coefficients of sandstone were investigated separately, and their relationship was established. First, mineral components and mechanical parameters of the sandstone were determined by X-ray diffraction and nanoindentation tests. Second, the friction coefficient in the macro scale was examined by tilt test and direct shear test, and the direct shear test was carried out on flat structural surface specimens dimensioning 10 cm×10 cm×5 cm subjected to constant normal stresses of 1, 2, 3, 8, and 12 MPa. The results show that the friction coefficient decreases in the logarithmic form as the normal stress rises, whereas it increases in the logarithmic form as the shear rate grows. Then, the friction coefficient in the micro scale was examined using nano-scratch test, and the results show that the friction coefficients of feldspar minerals first decrease and then remain unchanged with increasing load under low load conditions, and the friction coefficients of quartz minerals first decrease and then increase with increasing load. In addition, the friction coefficients of both minerals show an increasing trend with increasing shear rate under low load conditions, and remain stable under high load conditions. Finally, based on the macro-micro friction coefficient test results, the rate- and state-dependent friction (RSF) law was used to establish the linear regression equation linking the basic friction coefficient of red sandstone and the mineral friction coefficient, and the reliability of this empirical relationship was verified by the direct shear test with errors ranging from 0.17% to 0.91%. This study provides a new idea for the determination of the basic friction coefficient.

Key words: friction coefficient, microscale, direct shear test, nano-scratch, RSF law

中图分类号:

TU452

郑爽, 雍睿, 杜时贵, 何智海, 钟祯, 章莹莹, 眭素刚, . 基于纳米划痕试验的砂岩结构面宏−微观摩擦系数关系研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1022-1034.

ZHENG Shuang, YONG Rui, DU Shi-gui, HE Zhi-hai, ZHONG Zhen, ZHANG Ying-ying, SUI Su-gang, . Relationship between macro and micro friction coefficients of sandstone structural surface based on nano-scratch test[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(4): 1022-1034.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	范雷, 余美万, 邬爱清, 向前. 层间错动带水力耦合抗剪强度特性演化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1959-1970.
[2]	刘飞禹, 李昊泽, 符军, 孙宏磊, . 橡胶砂级配对混合土体剪切特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 663-672.
[3]	杨恩光, 杨立云, 胡桓宁, 汪自扬, 张飞. 单轴压缩荷载下闭合裂纹扩展的试验和数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 613-622.
[4]	高要辉, 张春生, 苏方声, 邱士利, . 深部硬岩剪切边界下应力诱发片帮的机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 1103-1111.
[5]	潘文韬, 杨文波, 吴枋胤, 何川, 赵亮亮, 姚人杰, 傅舰锋, . 基于单三轴试验与直剪试验的层状软岩模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(12): 3437-3452.
[6]	冯大阔, 张建民, . 应力幅值比对土-结构接触面非共轴特性影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(11): 3047-3058.
[7]	周远, 韦昌富, 周家作, 陈盼, 魏厚振, . 气体水合物喷射合成与直剪试验系统的研制与应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2311-2320.
[8]	范祥, 邓志颖, 崔志猛, 何忠明, 林杭, . 一种新的软−硬节理峰值剪切强度模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(7): 1861-1870.
[9]	刘飞禹, 江淮, 王军, . 砾石−格栅界面循环剪切软化特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(6): 1485-1492.
[10]	涂义亮, 刘新荣, 任青阳, 柴贺军, 王军保, 余佳玉. 含石量和颗粒破碎对土石混合料强度的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3919-3928.
[11]	唐丽云, 王鑫, 邱培勇, 金龙, . 冻土区土石混合体冻融交界面剪切性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3225-3235.
[12]	柴维, 龙志林, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, 闫超萍. 直剪剪切速率对钙质砂强度及变形特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 359-366.
[13]	张强, 李小春, 周英博, 石露, 白冰, . 高压孔隙CO2/水作用下完整四川三叠系砂岩剪切特性的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3028-3036.
[14]	李文轩, 卞士海, 李国英, 吴俊杰, . 粗粒料接触面模型及其在土石坝工程中的应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2379-2388.
[15]	陈国庆, 唐鹏, 李光明, 张广泽, 王栋, . 岩桥直剪试验声发射频谱特征及主破裂前兆分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1649-1656.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

基于纳米划痕试验的砂岩结构面宏−微观摩擦系数关系研究

Relationship between macro and micro friction coefficients of sandstone structural surface based on nano-scratch test

PDF (Chinese)

PDF (English)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10