岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (5): 1283-1294.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.0782

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于透明相似模型试验的主控裂隙边坡变形破坏演化机制研究

冷先伦1, 2,王川1, 2,盛谦1, 2,宋文军3,陈健1, 2,张占荣4,陈菲5   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049;3. 武汉轻工大学 土木工程与建筑学院,湖北 武汉 430023; 4. 中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司,湖北 武汉 430063;5. 成都大学 建筑与土木工程学院,四川 成都 610106
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-24 接受日期:2022-07-26 出版日期:2023-05-09 发布日期:2023-04-30
  • 作者简介:冷先伦,1980年生,男,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土工程与稳定方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52079135);中铁第四勘察设计院集团有限公司科研课题(No. 2020K043)。

Evolution mechanism of deformation and failure of rock slope with controlling fissure through transparent physical model experiments

LENG Xian-lun1, 2, WANG Chuan1, 2, SHENG Qian1, 2, SONG Wen-jun3, CHEN Jian1, 2, ZHANG Zhan-rong4, CHEN Fei5   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Wuhan Polytechnic University, Wuhan, Hubei 430023, China; 4. China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430063, China; 5. School of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Chengdu University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610106, China
  • Received:2022-05-24 Accepted:2022-07-26 Online:2023-05-09 Published:2023-04-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52079135) and the Research Project of China Railway Siyuan Survey and Design Group Co., Ltd. (2020K043).

摘要: 岩质边坡灾害孕育期的变形破坏发展过程通常受其内部长大裂隙(主控裂隙)控制,揭示主控裂隙边坡变形破坏演化机制对滑坡灾害防治具有重要意义。基于透明相似模型试验技术,选取2种典型主控裂隙(后缘陡倾角裂隙和前缘缓倾角裂隙)边坡为研究对象,在自研设备上开展了主控裂隙边坡内部变形破坏演化过程的模型试验研究;分别以位移速率和应变速率作为边坡变形和裂隙扩展的表征量,以无裂隙边坡变形破坏演化规律为参照,对比分析了后缘和前缘主控裂隙影响下边坡内部变形破坏的时空演化机制。结果表明:(1)通过模拟无裂隙边坡内部变形累积以及破裂萌生、扩展与贯通的渐进过程,验证了所采用的试验方法在研究边坡内部变形破坏演化过程方面的可靠性;(2)主控裂隙边坡内部变形破坏过程与无裂隙边坡相似,可分为变形累积、破裂带萌生/初始裂隙起裂、破裂带/裂隙扩展调整、破裂带/裂隙快速扩展贯通等4个阶段;(3)在初始主控裂隙滑移变形的作用下,后缘陡倾角裂隙尖端因受推移作用而发生拉张-剪切混合型起裂并向下扩展,前缘缓倾角裂隙尖端因受牵引作用而发生拉张型起裂并向上扩展,裂隙扩展速率随扩展长度的增加而呈指数型增长;(4)裂隙扩展类型随边坡变形与裂隙扩展过程不断调整,后缘陡倾角裂隙由初始拉张-剪切混合型扩展转化为剪切型扩展,并最终从坡趾附近剪出,前缘缓倾角裂隙由初始拉张型扩展转化为剪切型扩展,并最终与后缘破裂贯通。

关键词: 透明模型试验, 主控裂隙边坡, 可视化技术, 变形演化, 裂隙扩展

Abstract: The deformation and failure evolution process of rock slope during disaster incubation period is controlled by internal long fissures (controlling fissures), and the evolution mechanism is of great significance for the prevention of landslide disasters. Based on the transparent physical model experiment technology, two typical rock slopes with controlling fissures (one with a steep fissure at the back and the other with a gently inclined fissure at the front) were selected as the objects, and the evolution process of deformation and failure inside the slopes was studied through physical model experiments using the self-developed equipment. The displacement rate and strain rate were taken as the characterization quantities of the deformation and fissure propagation, and the spatiotemporal evolution mechanism under the influence of fissures was analyzed with the reference of the common slope without controlling fissure. The conclusions are: (1) The reliability of the proposed experiment method in the study of the deformation and failure evolution process inside the slopes was verified through the simulation of internal deformation accumulation and progressive process of fissure initiation, propagation, and penetration. (2) The deformation and failure process of the slopes with controlling fissures is similar to that of the slope without controlling fissures and can be divided into four stages: deformation accumulation, failure band/fissure initiation, failure band/fissure expansion adjustment, and rapid expansion and penetration of failure bands/fissures. (3) The tip of steep fissure at the back undergoes a tensile-shear mixed initiation and expands downward due to the pushing action induced by initial fissure slip deformation, while the tip of gently inclined fissure at the front undergoes tensile initiation and expands upward due to the traction induced by initial fissure slip deformation. The propagation rates of fissures increase exponentially with the increasing length of fissures. (4) The fissure propagation modes change with the evolution of slope deformation and fissure propagation. The steep fissure at the back starts to propagate in tensile-shear mixed mode and turns to propagate in shear mode, and finally shears out near the slope toe. The gently inclined fissure at the front firstly propagates in tensile mode and then transforms to shear mode, and finally intersects with the failure zone at the back.

Key words: transparent model experiment, slope with controlling fissure, visualization technology, deformation evolution, fissure propagation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 454
[1] 王川, 冷先伦, 张占荣, 杨闯, 陈健, . 基于裂隙扩展的多级岩质边坡 开挖卸荷破坏路径分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1190-1203.
[2] 朱涛, 尹翔, 王成汤, 闵弘, 王浩, 陈娱, 何俊霖, . 西昌太和矿北采场滑坡变形演化规律 及成因机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 392-400.
[3] 毛彦军, 陈曦, 范超男, 葛少成, 李文璞, . 基于CT三维重建的注水煤岩体裂隙扩展规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1717-1726.
[4] 肖捷夫, 李云安, 胡勇, 张申, 蔡浚明, . 库水涨落和降雨条件下古滑坡变形特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(2): 471-480.
[5] 黄晓虎, 易武, 黄海峰, 邓永煌. 优势流入渗与坡体变形关系研究及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1396-1403.
[6] 汤明高, 李松林, 许 强, 龚正峰, 祝 权, 魏 勇. 基于离心模型试验的库岸滑坡变形特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 755-764.
[7] 陈达, 许强, 郑光, 蔡国军, 彭双麒, 王卓, 何攀. 基于离心模型试验的复杂层状软岩楔形 滑坡变形演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3374-3384.
[8] 魏超, 朱维申, 李勇, 王书刚, 董振兴, 蔡卫兵, . 岩石倾斜裂隙与水平裂隙扩展贯通试验 及数值模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4533-4542.
[9] 李春元,张 勇,彭 帅,高守阳,马亚仲,. 深部开采底板岩体卸荷损伤的强扰动危险性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 3957-3968.
[10] 张希巍,王 刚,蔡 明,徐 荃,. 凌海花岗岩变形特点与脆性评价[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3515-3524.
[11] 陈 松,乔春生,叶 青,邓 斌. 基于摩尔-库仑准则的断续节理岩体复合损伤本构模型[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3612-3622.
[12] 杜国梁,张永双,姚 鑫,郭长宝,杨志华|. 都江堰市五里坡高位滑坡-碎屑流成因机制分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 493-501.
[13] 章 统,刘卫群,查 浩,费晓东,. 岩石类材料振动裂隙扩展试验和数值分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 761-768.
[14] 赵 瑜,王超林,万 文,. 压剪作用下裂隙扩展过程渗流与应力耦合模型研究[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2180-2186.
[15] 阎锡东 ,刘红岩 ,邢闯锋 ,李 超 ,王东会,. 基于微裂隙变形与扩展的岩石冻融损伤本构模型研究[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3489-3499.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 沈 扬,周 建,龚晓南,刘汉龙,. 考虑主应力方向变化的原状软黏土应力应变性状试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3720 -3726 .
[2] 李利平,李术才,张庆松. 岩溶地区隧道裂隙水突出力学机制研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 523 -528 .
[3] 张 文,王泽文,乐励华. 双重介质中的一类核素迁移数学模型及其反演[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 553 -558 .
[4] 李丽华,陈 轮,高盛焱. 翠湖湿地软土触变性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 765 -768 .
[5] 胡亚元. 利用EVP模型确定堆载预压法的卸载时机[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1827 -1832 .
[6] 章定文,韩文君,刘松玉. 初始应力各向异性状态下圆柱孔扩张机制分析[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 104 -108 .
[7] 李克钢,侯克鹏,李 旺. 指标动态权重对边坡稳定性的影响研究[J]. , 2009, 30(2): 492 -496 .
[8] 洪 勇,孙 涛,栾茂田,郑孝玉,汪发武. 土工环剪仪的开发及其应用研究现状[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 628 -633 .
[9] 张乾兵,朱维申,李 勇,孙林锋,张 磊. 洞群模型试验中微型多点位移计的设计及应用[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 623 -628 .
[10] 李京爽,侯瑜京,徐泽平,梁建辉,张雪东,宋献慧. 砂土自由场地基水平垂直振动离心模拟试验[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 208 -214 .