岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 2151-2160.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1181

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

可发性聚笨乙烯板减载条件下高填方箱涵长期受力特征与减载效果

高琦,陈保国,吴森,袁山,孙梦尧   

  1. 中国地质大学(武汉) 工程学院,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2022-07-30 接受日期:2022-10-04 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-16
  • 通讯作者: 陈保国,男,1981年生,博士,副教授,主要从事岩土体与结构物相互作用方面的科研工作。E-mail: baoguo_chen@126.com E-mail:gaoqi_96@163.com
  • 作者简介:高琦,男,1996年生,硕士研究生,主要从事填埋式结构物受力特性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.52178370)

Long-term stress characteristics and load reduction effect of high-fill box culverts with EPS slabs

GAO Qi, CHEN Bao-guo, WU Sen, YUAN Shan, SUN Meng-yao   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430074, China
  • Received:2022-07-30 Accepted:2022-10-04 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52178370).

摘要: 在高填方箱涵顶部铺设可发性聚苯乙烯(expandable polystyrene,简称EPS)板降低其荷载已经在工程中得以应用,而EPS板的蠕变会使箱涵受到的土压力随时间发生变化。现有的箱涵设计理论未能明确的反应EPS板的长期减载效果以及箱涵长期受力特性。开展了EPS板减载条件下箱涵短期受力特性模型试验,并利用模型试验结果验证数值模型。之后利用验证后的数值模拟方法分析涵−土体系应力重分布规律以及高填方箱涵长期受力特征;在此基础上提出涵−土体系力学模型,推得涵顶长期土压力计算方法,并与数值模拟结果进行对比验证。研究表明:涵顶土压力先随时间逐渐减小,然后会出现小幅增大,最终趋于稳定,对比填土完成时土压力减小了52.12%;涵侧竖向土压力和水平土压力总体上均随着时间逐渐增大并趋于稳定,涵侧上部范围内最终水平土压力比填土完毕时增长了28.32%;基底土压力也是先增大后趋于稳定。实际工程中侧墙的设计应考虑EPS板蠕变引起水平土压力的增加,避免箱涵侧墙在长期使用中产生受弯破坏。

关键词: 可发性聚苯乙烯板, 减载, 箱涵, 长期受力特征, 蠕变, 减载效果

Abstract: Laying expandable polystyrene (EPS) slabs on the top of high-fill box culverts to reduce earth pressure has been used in engineering practice, but the creep of EPS slabs will cause the earth pressure on the box culvert to change over time. The present design theory of box culverts cannot clearly reflect the long-term load reduction effect of EPS slabs and the long-term stress characteristics of box culverts. In this analysis, model tests were carried out to investigate the short-term stress characteristics of the box culvert with EPS slabs, and a numerical model was validated by the model test results. Then the verified numerical simulation method was used to analyze the stress redistribution of the culvert-soil system and the long-term stress characteristics of the high-fill box culvert. On this basis, the mechanical model of the culvert-soil system was proposed, and the calculation method of long-term earth pressure on the top of the culvert was deduced and compared with the numerical simulation results for verification. The research results showed that the earth pressure on the top of the culvert decreased gradually with time, then increased slightly and finally became stable. Compared with the earth pressure at the completion of filling, the long-term earth pressure decreased by 52.12%. The vertical and horizontal earth pressure on the culvert side increased gradually with time and tended to be stable, and the long-term horizontal earth pressure in the upper range of the culvert side increased by 28.32% compared with that when the filling was completed. The foundation contact pressure also increased slightly at first and then tended to be stable. The increase of horizontal earth pressure caused by the creep of EPS slabs should be considered in the design of sidewalls in practical engineering so as to avoid bending failure of box culver sidewalls in the long-term use.

Key words: expandable polystyrene slab, load reduction, box culvert, long-term stress characteristics, creep, load reduction effect

中图分类号: 

  • TU432
[1] 洪义, 郑博文, 姚梦浩, 王立忠, 孙海泉, 许冬, . 深海硅藻土微观结构及一维压缩特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(增刊): 268-276.
[2] 骆祚森, 朱作祥, 苏卿, 李建林, 邓华锋, 杨超, . 基于平行黏结模型的水-岩作用下砂岩蠕变模拟及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2445-2457.
[3] 黄建, 德圃榕, 姚仰平, 彭仁, 齐吉琳. 基于修正幂律模型的高填方蠕变沉降简化算法[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 2095-2104.
[4] 范金洋, 唐璐宣, 陈结, 杨镇宇, 姜德义, . 基于硬化参量的盐岩蠕变疲劳本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1271-1282.
[5] 高燕, 余骏远, 陈庆, 史天根, . 侧限条件下密实砂土蠕变的颗粒运动特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1385-1394.
[6] 孙晓明, 姜铭, 王新波, 臧金诚, 高祥, 缪澄宇, . 万福煤矿不同含水率砂岩蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 624-636.
[7] 杨俊涛, 宋彦琦, 马宏发, 杨江坤, 邵志鑫, 鲍伟. 考虑硬化和损伤效应的盐岩蠕变本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2953-2966.
[8] 陈星, 李建林, 邓华锋, 党莉, 刘奇, 王兴霞, 王伟, . 卸荷蠕变条件下软硬相接岩层非协调变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 303-316.
[9] 陈宾, 邓坚, 胡杰铭, 张建林, 张涛, . 钙质砂一维蠕变分形破碎特性宏微观试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1781-1790.
[10] 王智超, 罗磊, 田英辉, 张春会, . 非饱和压实土率敏性及蠕变时效特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(7): 1816-1824.
[11] 冷伍明, 邓志龙, 徐方, 张期树, 董俊利, 刘思慧. 基于路基土蠕变效应的路基预应力损失模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1671-1682.
[12] 胡惠华, 贺建清, 聂士诚, . 洞庭湖砂纹淤泥质土一维固结蠕变模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(5): 1269-1276.
[13] 朱文波, 戴国亮, 王博臣, 龚维明, 王海波, 张宇, . 吸力式沉箱基础底部土体卸荷蠕变及其长期 抗拔承载特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 669-678.
[14] 于洪丹, 陈卫忠, 卢琛, 杨典森, 杨建平, 王震, . 黏土岩时效变形特性试验与理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 317-326.
[15] 朱文波, 戴国亮, 王博臣, 龚维明, 孙捷, 胡皓, . 吸力式沉箱底部土体循环特性 及其等效循环蠕变模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(2): 466-478.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .