岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 2871-2878.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0375

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

井周堵塞对承压含水层定流量回灌渗流场影响的半解析研究

李炯1, 2, 3,李明广1, 2,詹红兵4,陈锦剑1, 2,夏小和1, 2,张硕3   

  1. 1. 上海交通大学 土木工程系,上海 200240;2. 上海交通大学 上海市公共建筑和基础设施数字化运维重点实验室,上海 200240; 3. 清华大学 水利水电工程系,北京 100084;4. 德克萨斯农工大学 地质与地球物理系,美国 德克萨斯 77843
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-28 接受日期:2023-07-26 出版日期:2023-10-13 发布日期:2023-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 李明广,男,1987年生,博士,副研究员,博士生导师,主要从事软土地下水渗流方面的研究。E-mail: lmg20066028@sjtu.edu.cn E-mail: lijiong0814@sjtu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:李炯,男,1990年生,博士,博士后,主要从事地下水渗流研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.42077166);上海市科委社发项目(No.22DZ1202904);上海市自然科学基金(No.22ZR1430800)

Semi-analytical solutions for groundwater flow dynamics in confined aquifers under constant-rate injection considering clogging of aquifers around well

LI Jiong1, 2, 3, LI Ming-guang1, 2, ZHAN Hong-bing4, CHEN Jin-jian1, 2, XIA Xiao-he1, 2, ZHANG Shuo3   

  1. 1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. Shanghai Key Laboratory for Digital Maintenance of Buildings and Infrastructure, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 3. Department of Hydraulic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China; 4. Department of Geology & Geophysics, Texas A&M University, Texas 77843, USA
  • Received:2023-03-28 Accepted:2023-07-26 Online:2023-10-13 Published:2023-10-16
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077166), the Science & Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (22DZ1202904) and the Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (22ZR1430800).

摘要:

为分析定流量条件下回灌堵塞对井周含水层渗流响应的影响,采用指数形式的渗透系数衰减方程反映堵塞作用下井周含水层渗透特性的时变效应,建立了考虑堵塞效应的定流量非完整回灌井流力学模型,采用变量代换、Laplace变换和有限余弦Fourier变换得到了井周含水层中水位抬升在Laplace空间的解,应用Stehfest数值逆变换方法获得了实时空间内的水头抬升和回灌压力。参数分析结果表明,较小的渐近渗透系数Kr,∞会增加回灌过程中水头抬升和回灌压力,并加剧含水层达到拟稳态时的渗流响应;较大的渗透系数衰减指数λ 仅增加回灌过程中水头抬升和回灌压力,但不影响含水层达到拟稳态时的渗流响应;因Kr,∞λ 不同而引起的水头差在井筒处达到最大值并沿径向距离逐渐减小。研究结果可以为定流量回灌中井周含水层堵塞的识别与预测提供理论依据。

关键词: 回灌堵塞, 定流量回灌, 非完整井, 井流力学, 半解析解

Abstract:

To investigate the effect of clogging of aquifers around well on the flow dynamics in the well vicinity during the constant-rate recharge using a partially penetrating injection well, an analytical model for well hydraulics was proposed with special consideration of the clogging-related permeability reduction, which was assumed to reduce exponentially with time. By means of the variable substitution and the Laplace and finite Fourier cosine transforms, the solutions for the hydraulic head increment in the Laplace domain were derived and then the solutions in the real-time domain were obtained using the Stehfest numerical inversion method. A parametric study indicates that: a smaller asymptotic hydraulic conductivity Kr,∞ can not only increase the hydraulic head increment and the injection pressure during the recharge process but also accelerate the flow dynamics of the recharged aquifer at the quasi-steady state, whereas a larger permeability reduction exponent λ only result in larger hydraulic head increment and the injection pressure during the recharge process but doesn’t affect the flow dynamics at the quasi-steady state. The hydraulic head difference distribution due to various Kr,∞ and λ values reaches its maximum value in the wellbore and then decreases gradually with the radial distance. The findings of this study can offer theoretical reference for the estimation and prediction of the clogging in the aquifer around well during the constant-rate injection test.

Key words: clogging of aquifers around well, constant-rate injection, partially penetrating well, well hydraulics, semi-analytical solutions

中图分类号: 

  • TU42
[1] 秦爱芳, 孟红苹, 江良华. 电渗−堆载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 97-106.
[2] 汪磊, 张立婷, 沈思东, 徐永福, 夏小和. 分段循环荷载作用下非饱和土轴对称固结特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 203-212.
[3] 翟张辉, 张亚国, 李同录, 肖书雄, . 考虑边界效应的非饱和土圆柱孔扩张问题解析[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 301-311.
[4] 李镜培, 刘耕云, 周攀, . 基于相似性原理超固结土不排水扩张半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 582-590.
[5] 李瑛, 陈东, 刘兴旺, 谢锡荣, 童星, 张金红. 悬挂式止水帷幕深基坑减压降水的简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 826-832.
[6] 冯庆高, 蔡兵华, 冯晓腊, 袁祥, . 侧向有限越流承压含水层中非完整井非 稳定流模型及解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 168-176.
[7] 胡安峰, 周禹杉, 陈缘, 夏长青, 谢康和, . 结构性土一维非线性大应变固结半解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2583-2591.
[8] 蒙宇涵, 张必胜, 陈征, 梅国雄, . 线性加载下含砂垫层地基固结分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 461-468.
[9] 汪 磊,李林忠,徐永福,夏小和,孙德安,. 半透水边界下分数阶黏弹性饱和土一维固结特性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4142-4148.
[10] 张 浩,石名磊,郭院成,李永辉,. 边载作用下桥梁基桩-立柱的位移特征与受力分析[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2683-2692.
[11] 解 益,李培超,汪 磊,孙德安,. 分数阶导数黏弹性饱和土体一维固结半解析解[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3240-3246.
[12] 秦爱芳,张九龙. 考虑渗透系数变化的非饱和土固结性状分析[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1521-1528.
[13] 凌道盛 ,王 筠 ,单振东 ,丁皓江 , . 单层非饱和多孔介质一维瞬态响应半解析解[J]. , 2014, 35(1): 25-34.
[14] 申林方 ,王志良 ,谢建斌 . 基于边界配点法浅埋隧道开挖引起 周围土体变形的分析 [J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 297-301.
[15] 周 扬,周国庆. 土体一维冻结问题温度场半解析解[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 309-0313.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 周火垚,施建勇. 饱和软黏土中足尺静压桩挤土效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3291 -3296 .
[2] 樊晓一. 地震与非地震诱发滑坡的运动特征对比研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 31 -37 .
[3] 童志怡,陈从新,徐 健,张高朝,路 为. 边坡稳定性分析的条块稳定系数法[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1393 -1398 .
[4] 孙 博,周仲华,张虎元,张永霞,郑 龙. 夯土建筑遗址表面温度变化特征及预报模型[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 867 -871 .
[5] 尚彦军 ,史永跃 ,林达明 ,吴锋波 ,张 巍. 从浅表花岗岩体中地应力测试深度与应力值间关系分析剥蚀厚度[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1430 -1436 .
[6] 田管凤 ,汤连生. 侧限压缩条件下土体的侧应力松弛试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(3): 783 -787 .
[7] 潘华利 ,欧国强 ,黄江成 ,曹 波 . 缺资料地区泥石流预警雨量阈值研究[J]. , 2012, 33(7): 2122 -2126 .
[8] 刘 旭,王兰民,陈龙珠,孙军杰. 基于微结构失稳假说及广义吸力理论的黄土体变模型[J]. , 2007, 28(12): 2517 -2523 .
[9] 张 芳 ,刘泉声 ,张程远 ,蒋景东,. 流变应力恢复法地应力测试及装置[J]. , 2014, 35(5): 1506 -1513 .
[10] 李 兵,郭启良,王建新,胡秀宏,丁立丰,许俊闪. 蒙山断裂地应力特征及其稳定性分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 501 -507 .