岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 3059-3070.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0578

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

水下双面真空预压离心模型试验及数值模拟分析

胡利文1, 2,洪义3,王德咏1, 2   

  1. 1. 中交四航工程研究院有限公司,广东 广州 510230;2. 南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海),广东 珠海 519082; 3. 浙江大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 杭州 310056
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-09 接受日期:2023-07-10 出版日期:2023-10-13 发布日期:2023-10-16
  • 作者简介:胡利文,男,1971年生,博士,正高级工程师,主要从事地基处理、基坑、边坡及桩基的理论与应用研究。

Centrifuge modelling and numerical analysis on underwater two-way vacuum preloading

HU Li-wen1, 2, HONG Yi3, WANG De-yong1, 2   

  1. 1. CCCC Fourth Harbor Engineering Institute, Co., Ltd., Guangzhou, Guangdong 510230, China; 2. Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Zhuhai), Zhuhai, Guangdong 519082, China; 3. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310056, China
  • Received:2023-05-09 Accepted:2023-07-10 Online:2023-10-13 Published:2023-10-16

摘要: 水下双面真空预压既有低位真空比顶部真空更大降低土体内孔隙水压力的特点,又有水下真空预压可以更好利用上覆水荷载的优点。然而双面真空预压目前仅在处理疏浚土时应用,在固结机制和固结行为方面研究尚不深入。为探讨水下双面真空预压的加固特征和加固效果,采用离心模型试验模拟软土在顶部与底部同时受真空联合砂井预压,并利用有限元分析离心模型试验结果,对孔隙水压力和变形进行了比较分析,探讨了水下双面真空预压总水头分布的变化、应力路径的发展,并评价了固结速率。通过试验和分析发现,水下双面真空预压比陆上真空预压有更大的有效预压荷载,砂井能加速土体固结并减少土体最终沉降,加固区中部应力路径基本按K0发展;同时在重力与真空双重作用下,底部孔隙水压力下降值远大于顶部孔隙水压力下降值,加固后期底部为低水头区。上述发现增强了对水下双面真空预压的认识和开发利用。

关键词: 双面真空预压, 水下地基, 离心模型, 数值分析, 固结

Abstract: Underwater two-way vacuum preloading not only reduces more excess pore water pressure comparing to conventional vacuum preloading with vacuum acting only on the top face, but also has the advantage of utilizing the effective load from the overlying water. However, two-way vacuum preloading is currently only applied in the treatment of dredged soil, thus the mechanism and performance of consolidation of two-way vacuum preloading are hardly studied. To explore the consolidation characteristics and efficiency of underwater two-way vacuum preloading, centrifuge modelling has been performed to simulate soft soil subjected to underwater two-way vacuum preloading in collaboration with group sand drains and single sand drain. The finite element method is also used to analyze and compare the results with those from centrifuge modelling test. Variation of pore water pressure and development of deformation are compared. Meanwhile, changes in total head of pore water and stress path of soil element, as well as degree of consolidation are discussed and evaluated. It is found that more effective load can be obtained from underwater two-way vacuum preloading comparing to conventional vacuum preloading, and the rate of consolidation is larger and the ultimate settlement can be reduced in group sand drains zone comparing with single sand drain zone. The stresses for soil in the center of treated zone follow a path close to K0 line. Under the combination effects of vacuum and gravity, the reduction of pore water pressure at the bottom layer is larger than that at the top layer, and it is found that a lower water head exists at the bottom at final consolidation stage in this experiment. These findings may enhance the understanding and practical application for two-way vacuum preloading.

Key words: two-way vacuum preloading, underwater ground, centrifuge modelling, numerical analysis, consolidation

中图分类号: 

  • TU447
[1] 贾超, 董啸, 丁朋朋, 冯克印, 王辉, 王明珠, . 孔隙型地热储层热固结变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(增刊): 91-98.
[2] 邓岳保, 张晨豪, 王忻, 张日红. 植入式排水桩固结理论[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2639-2647.
[3] 韩柏林, 卢萌盟. 考虑桩体刺入变形的透水混凝土桩复合地基固结理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2360-2368.
[4] 王智超, 彭乙芹, 秦云, 田英辉, 罗光财, . 基于统一屈服准则超固结土的应力诱导各向异性下负荷面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1891-1900.
[5] 张院生, 雷云超, 强小俊, 吴东东, 王东坡, 王计华, . 多排微型桩框架结构加固边坡离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1983-1994.
[6] 彭文明, 张雪东, 夏勇, . 软弱覆盖层上土石坝动力离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(6): 1771-1778.
[7] 张季如, 郑颜军, 彭伟珂, 王磊, 陈敬鑫. 填土应力路径下珊瑚砂幂律应力-应变模型的适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1309-1318.
[8] 王元战, 龚晓龙, 王轩, 陈艳萍, 谢涛, . 偏压固结下碱渣土循环累积孔压及强度弱化规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 373-380.
[9] 常留成, 王红雨, 王亚, 曹静. 含砂量对砂−细粒混合土一维蠕变行为的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(12): 3370-3382.
[10] 王宽君, 贾志远, 沈侃敏, 汤鄢. 台州滨海软黏土强度特性室内外联合标定[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2851-2859.
[11] 王才进, 武猛, 杨洋, 蔡国军, 刘松玉, 何欢, 常建新. 基于生物地理优化的人工神经网络模型预测 软土的固结系数[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 3022-3030.
[12] 史蓝天, 李传勋, 杨洋. 变荷载下考虑井阻随时空变化的竖井地基固结解[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 183-192.
[13] 何冠, 姚仰平. 统一硬化模型与下加载面模型的理论关系[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 11-22.
[14] 袁俊平, 陈龙, 梁艳, 丁国权, 殷宗泽, . 对欠固结土的超固结比的探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 85-94.
[15] 罗维平, 袁大军, 金大龙, 陆平, 陈健, 郭海鹏, . 富水砂层盾构开挖面支护压力与地层变形关系 离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 345-354.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 李 奎,高 波. 地铁隧道下穿小河和桥梁的施工方案研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1509 -1516 .
[2] 杨 冰,杨 军,常 在,甘厚义,宋二祥. 土石混合体压缩性的三维颗粒力学研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1645 -1650 .
[3] 肖世国,鲜 飞,王唤龙. 一种微型桩组合抗滑结构内力分析方法[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2553 -2559 .
[4] 叶海林,郑颖人,黄润秋,杜修力,李安洪,许江波. 强度折减动力分析法在滑坡抗滑桩抗震设计中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 317 -323 .
[5] 张志沛,彭 惠,饶 晓. 软土地基注浆扩散过程数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 652 -0655 .
[6] 吴礼舟 ,张利民 ,黄润秋. 成层非饱和土渗流的耦合解析解[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2391 -2396 .
[7] 刘 润 ,王秀妍 ,刘月辉 ,王武刚. 点支撑缺陷下海底埋管热屈曲分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 64 -69 .
[8] 梁耀哲. 刚性桩复合地基的主动土压力分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S1): 25 -29 .
[9] 韩建新 ,李术才 ,李树忱 ,杨为民 ,汪 雷 . 基于强度参数演化行为的岩石峰后应力-应变关系研究[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 342 -346 .
[10] 黄 达 ,岑夺丰 ,黄润秋 . 单裂隙砂岩单轴压缩的中等应变率效应颗粒流模拟[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 535 -545 .