›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 631-640.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环荷载下圆柱形桩与楔形桩复合地基工作性状对比试验研究

刘 杰,肖佳兴,何 杰   

  1. 湖南工业大学 土木工程学院,湖南 株洲 412007
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-20 出版日期:2014-03-10 发布日期:2014-03-19
  • 作者简介:刘杰,男,1963年生,博士(后),教授,长期从事软土地基处理及基础工程的教学与研究
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51078140)。

Comparison experimental research on work behavior of composite foundation with column and tapered piles under cyclic loadings

LIU Jie,XIAO Jia-xing,HE Jie   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou, Hunan 412007, China
  • Received:2013-02-20 Online:2014-03-10 Published:2014-03-19

摘要: 为探讨循环荷载作用下夯实水泥土圆柱形桩与夯实水泥土楔形桩复合地基工作性状的差异,通过室内模型试验,并在桩顶及桩周土表面埋设微型土压力盒,进行循环荷载下夯实水泥土圆柱形桩和楔形桩的4桩复合地基及单纯软土地基工作性状对比试验,探讨循环应力比和加载周数对夯实水泥土圆柱形桩和楔形桩复合地基永久沉降、桩-土应力比的影响规律。研究软土地基加固方法对永久沉降和桩-土应力比的影响,揭示了循环应力比与桩-土应力比的关系。研究结果表明:采用夯实水泥土桩加固软土地基,能提高地基的临界循环应力比,增强地基抵抗循环荷载的能力;在相同的加荷周数和循环应力比的加载条件下,采用夯实水泥土楔形桩加固软土地基对降低地基永久沉降的效果比采用夯实水泥土圆柱形桩的效果要好,且楔形桩的楔角越大,降低永久沉降的效果越明显。循环应力比越大,桩-土应力比越大;桩-土应力比随楔形桩楔角的增大而增大,随加载周数的增加而降低,并存在一临界加载周数;当加载周数小于临界周数时,桩-土应力比随加载周数迅速降低;当加载周数超过临界周数时,桩-土应力比几乎不随加载周数的变化而变化。

关键词: 永久沉降, 复合地基, 桩-土应力比, 循环应力比

Abstract: To study difference for the work behavior of the composite foundation with rammed cement-soil column and tapered piles under cyclic load, based on the indoor model tests, and installing the miniature soil pressure boxes on the pile-top and the soil surface, the contrast model tests of working properties for the composite foundation with 4 rammed cement-soil column piles and with 4 rammed cement-soil tapered piles, and the soft foundation are performed in laboratory, respectively. The influence laws of the cyclic stress ratio and the number of cyclic load on the permanent settlement and the pile-soil stress ratio of the composite foundation with rammed cement-soil column and tapered piles are explored. The influence of the reinforcing methods on the permanent settlement and the pile-soil stress ratio are researched in the soft foundation. The relation of the cyclic stress ratio and the pile-soil stress ratio is revealed. The results of the study show that the critical cyclic stress ratio and the ability to resist cyclic load of the foundation may be enhanced by the composite foundation with rammed cement-soil piles. In the same loading conditions for the same number of cyclic load and the same cyclic stress ratio, the effect that the permanent settlement is decreased by the composite foundation with rammed cement-soil tapered piles is better than that by rammed cement-soil column piles. The greater the wedge angle is, the better the effect is. The greater the cyclic stress ratio is, the greater the pile-soil stress ratio is. The pile-soil stress ratio increases as the wedge angle of the tapered pile increasing; but that decreases as the number of cyclic load increasing. There is a critical number of cyclic load. When the number of loading cycle is less than the critical number of cyclic load, the pile-soil stress ratio decreases rapidly as the number of cyclic load increasing. When the number of loading cycle is more than the critical number of cyclic load, the pile-soil stress ratio almost has no change as the number of cyclic load increasing.

Key words: permanent settlement, composite foundation, pile-soil stress ratio, cyclic stress ratio

中图分类号: 

  • TU473
[1] 马维嘉, 陈国兴, 吴琪, . 复杂加载条件下珊瑚砂抗液化强度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 535-542.
[2] 黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[3] 张峰, 陈国兴, 吴琪, 周正龙. 波浪荷载下饱和粉土不排水动力特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2695-2702.
[4] 邹佑学, 王睿, 张建民, . 可液化场地碎石桩复合地基地震动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[5] 唐晓武, 杨晓秋, 俞 悦. 开孔管桩复合地基排水固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1248-1254.
[6] 尹 锋, 周 航, 刘汉龙, 楚 剑, . 车辆载重与动荷载对X形桩桩-网复合地基动力 特性影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1324-1330.
[7] 芮 瑞, 孙 义, 朱 勇, 吴端正, 夏元友, . 刚性基础下复合地基褥垫层细观工作机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 445-454.
[8] 陈昌富, 邱琳淇, 毛凤山, 周志军, . 基于加权扰动共生生物搜索算法 桩网复合地基优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4477-4485.
[9] 陆清元,罗 强,蒋良潍, . 路堤下刚性桩复合地基桩-土应力比计算[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2473-2482.
[10] 黄俊杰,王 薇,苏 谦,李 婷,王 迅,. 素混凝土桩复合地基支承路堤变形破坏模式[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1653-1661.
[11] 牛婷婷,刘汉龙,丁选明,陈育民,. 高铁列车荷载作用下桩网复合地基振动特性模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 872-880.
[12] 姜文雨, 刘 一, . 刚性桩复合地基中性面深度与桩土应力比计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4554-4560.
[13] 王正振,龚维明,戴国亮,王晓阳,李亮亮,肖 刚,. 厚垫层-砂桩复合地基现场试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3755-3762.
[14] 周正龙,陈国兴,赵 凯,吴 琪,马维嘉. 循环加载方向角对饱和粉土不排水动力特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 36-44.
[15] 李连祥,黄佳佳,符庆宏,成晓阳,胡 峰, . 不同置换率复合地基力学性状附加荷载影响规律离心试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 131-139.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 李元亨,陈国良,刘修国,尚建嘎. 主TIN模式下面向拓扑的三维地质块体构建方法[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1902 -1906 .
[3] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[4] 张 波,李术才,杨学英,王锡平. 三维黏弹性人工边界地震波动输入方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 774 -778 .
[5] 周 华,王国进,傅少君,邹丽春,陈胜宏. 小湾拱坝坝基开挖卸荷松弛效应的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[6] 叶 飞,朱合华,何 川. 盾构隧道壁后注浆扩散模式及对管片的压力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[7] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[8] 宋义敏 ,姜耀东 ,马少鹏 ,杨小彬 ,赵同彬 . 岩石变形破坏全过程的变形场和能量演化研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1352 -1356 .
[9] 夏艳华 ,白世伟 . 基于水平集的复杂三维地层模型建模及在地下工程中的应用研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1445 -1450 .
[10] 张春阳,曹 平,范 祥,林 杭,万琳辉. 高黏性铝土矿放矿流动性试验与微观力学研究[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1653 -1659 .