考虑基坑卸载影响的改进弹性抗力法及其应用

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (S1): 129-133.

考虑基坑卸载影响的改进弹性抗力法及其应用

应宏伟^{1, 2}，聂文峰^{1, 2}，郭雷³，杨永文^{1, 2}

1. 浙江大学岩土工程研究所，杭州 310058；2. 浙江大学软弱土与环境土工教育部重点实验室，杭州 310058； 3.华润置地（苏州）有限公司，江苏苏州 215001

收稿日期:2011-01-19 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2011-05-16
作者简介:宏伟，男，1971年生，博士，副教授，主要从事软黏土力学与地基处理、土工数值分析、地下工程的教学与科研工作
基金资助:
“十一五”国家科技支撑项目资助（No. 2008BAJ06B01）；浙江省重点创新团队支持计划资助（No. 2009R50050）

A modified beam-spring model method and its application considering unloading effect during excavation

YING Hong-wei^{1, 2}, NIE Wen-feng^{1, 2}, GUO Lei3, YANG Yong-wen^{1, 2}

1. Institute of Geotechnical Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; 2. MOE, Key Laboratory of Soft Soils and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; 3. China Resources Land (Suzhou) Limited, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215001, China

Received:2011-01-19 Online:2011-05-15 Published:2011-05-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 弹性抗力法是目前实际工程中基坑支护结构变形内力计算的一种主要方法，该方法借鉴的是计算水平荷载作用下竖直放置弹性桩的地基反力系数法，但没有考虑开挖卸载对土抗力系数和坑内土体的变形影响，因而导致变形计算值通常小于实测值。首先在开挖面施加反向自重应力模拟基坑的开挖卸荷，利用Mindlin解得到坑内土体的卸荷应力分布；在前人的实验研究基础上，推导了不同卸荷比下考虑卸荷影响的土体水平抗力系数；将支护结构的变形分解为开挖瞬时的卸载作用和基坑内外水土压力差作用2个阶段，考虑卸载应力路径对坑内土体水平抗力系数以及开挖瞬时变形的影响，对传统的弹性抗力法进行了改进，最后将该方法应用于典型三维基坑算例。研究发现，改进法得到的支护结构水平变形大于传统方法，而对内力结果影响不大；基坑平面尺寸越大，两者的变形结果差别越明显，改进法更能反映平面尺寸对基坑变形的影响

关键词: 基坑, 卸载, 弹性抗力法, 水平基床系数

Abstract: Beam-spring model method is a primary method for designing of retaining structures in actual excavation projects; it is based on foundation reaction coefficient method for calculating vertical elastic piles acted by horizontal loads. Unfortunately, the current method cannot consider the unloading effect on the soil lateral resistance coefficient and the soil deformation in the pit, so as to lead to underestimate the horizontal deformation of the retaining wall. The distribution of unloading stresses is deduced using the Mindlin solution. On the basis of previous experimental studies, the soil resistance coefficients considering the effect of excavation unloading under different ratios of unloading are derived. The development of deformation of retaining structures is divided into two stages: the first is the instantaneous unloading deformation of the soil in the pit; and the second is the deformation of retaining wall induced by the lateral earth pressure differences on the wall. Then a modified beam-spring model method is presented considering unloading stress paths and unloading deformations. Finally, the method is applied to two typical 3D numerical excavation cases. It is shown that the horizontal displacement of the wall calculated by the modified method is greater while the difference between the internal forces is quite small; the greater the excavation plane size is, the more obvious the differences between the deformation results are. The modified method can better reflect the effect of the size of the base plane on the deformation of the retaining structure.

Key words: excavation, unloading, beam-spring model method, lateral resistance coefficient

中图分类号:

TU 471

应宏伟，聂文峰，郭雷，杨永文. 考虑基坑卸载影响的改进弹性抗力法及其应用[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 129-133.

YING Hong-wei, NIE Wen-feng, GUO Lei, YANG Yong-wen. A modified beam-spring model method and its application considering unloading effect during excavation[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 129-133.

参考文献

null

相关文章 15

[1]	王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2]	魏纲, 张鑫海, 林心蓓, 华鑫欣, . 基坑开挖引起的旁侧盾构隧道横向受力变化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 635-644.
[3]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[4]	丁智, 张霄, 金杰克, 王立忠, . 基坑全过程开挖及邻近地铁隧道变形实测分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 415-423.
[5]	陈勇, 苏剑, 谈云志, CHAN Dave, . 循环脱吸湿与加卸载耦合作用下土体持水性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2907-2913.
[6]	申翃, 李晓, 雷美清, 徐文博, 余秀玲, . 剪力键支护体系的构想及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2574-2580.
[7]	王辰霖, 张小东, 杜志刚, . 循环加卸载作用下预制裂隙煤样渗透性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2140-2153.
[8]	余瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[9]	谷淡平, 凌同华, . 悬臂式型钢水泥土搅拌墙的水泥土承载比和墙顶位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1957-1965.
[10]	刘念武, 陈奕天, 龚晓南, 俞济涛, . 软土深开挖致地铁车站基坑及邻近建筑变形特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1515-1525.
[11]	钟国强, 王浩, 孔利, 王成汤, . 基于T-S模糊故障树的地连墙+支撑支护基坑坍塌可能性评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1569-1576.
[12]	李军, 张杨, 胡大伟, 周辉, 卢景景, 吕涛, 史林肯, . 花岗岩三轴循环加卸载条件下的气体渗透率[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 693-700.
[13]	李连祥, 刘嘉典, 李克金, 黄亨利, 季相凯, . 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[14]	王鹏飞, 李长洪, 马学文, 李子建, 刘景军, 武洋帆, . 断层带不同含石率土石混合体渗流特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 53-61.
[15]	张骁, 肖军华, 农兴中, 郭佳奇, 吴楠, . 基于HS-Small模型的基坑近接桥桩开挖变形影响区研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 263-273.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed