注浆桩土接触面试验研究及后注浆抗拔桩承载特性数值分析

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (S1): 662-0668.

注浆桩土接触面试验研究及后注浆抗拔桩承载特性数值分析

钱建固^{1, 2}，贾鹏^{1, 2}，程明进^{1, 2}，黄茂松^{1, 2}

1. 同济大学地下建筑与工程系，上海 200092；2. 同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室，上海 200092

收稿日期:2011-01-18 出版日期:2011-05-15 发布日期:2011-05-16
作者简介:钱建固，男，1972年生，博士，副教授，主要从事地下工程与岩土力学方面的科研和教学工作
基金资助:
上海市科委重大项目（No. 07dz12006）

Experimental study of grouting pile-soil interface and numerical simulation of bearing behavior of side-grouting uplift pile

QIAN Jian-gu^{1, 2}, JIA Peng^{1, 2}, CHENG Ming-jin^{1, 2}, HUANG Mao-song^{1, 2}

1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2011-01-18 Online:2011-05-15 Published:2011-05-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 桩侧后注浆抗拔桩是一种新型的抗拔桩基础。借助于试验和数值手段对这种抗拔桩的承载变形特性开展了深入研究。首先进行了接触面的大型剪切试验，以揭示桩土接触面在注浆与未注浆前后其力学特性的差异性，并基于大型接触面剪切试验成果，建立了桩土接触面的修正库仑摩擦模型。将接触面模型应用到有限元数值分析，分别模拟了传统等截面抗拔桩与后注浆抗拔桩的承载变形特性。研究表明，相比传统的抗拔桩，桩侧后注浆抗拔桩的侧摩阻力得到了显著的改善，特别是深处的桩侧极限摩阻力得到了更充分的发挥，从而桩侧注浆抗拔桩的承载能力有了较大程度的提高。

关键词: 桩侧后注浆抗拔桩, 抗拔承载力, 大型直剪试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: The side-grouting uplift pile is a newly developed pile foundations. This paper aims to demonstrate the features of deformation and bearing capacity of this class of piles using experimental and numerical approaches. A series of large–scale direct shear tests were performed to show the effects of grouting on the behavior of pile-soil interface. Based on the experimental observations of the large-scale shear tests, the revised coulomb friction model is built and used in the finite element method. The bearing capacity and load-displacement curve for non-grouting and side-grouting piles are obtained respectively. The study results show that the side-grouting uplift pile possesses a larger skin-resistance because its deep critical skin-resistance can be fully developed. As a consequence, the side-grouting uplift pile displays a much higher bearing capacity than traditional uplift pile.

Key words: side-grouting uplift pile, uplift bearing capacity, large-scale direct shear test, numerical simulation

中图分类号:

TU 473

钱建固，贾鹏，程明进，黄茂松. 注浆桩土接触面试验研究及后注浆抗拔桩承载特性数值分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 662-0668.

QIAN Jian-gu , JIA Peng , CHENG Ming-jin , HUANG Mao-song. Experimental study of grouting pile-soil interface and numerical simulation of bearing behavior of side-grouting uplift pile[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 662-0668.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	李翻翻, 陈卫忠, 雷江, 于洪丹, 马永尚, . 基于塑性损伤的黏土岩力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 132-140.
[2]	夏坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[3]	戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[4]	郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[5]	闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[6]	刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[7]	金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[8]	韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[9]	吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[10]	王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[11]	吴凤元, 樊赟赟, 陈剑平, 李军, . 基于不同侵蚀模型的高速崩滑碎屑流动力过程模拟分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3236-3246.
[12]	孙峰, 薛世峰, 逄铭玉, 唐梅荣, 张翔, 李川, . 基于连续损伤的水平井射孔-近井筒三维破裂模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3255-3261.
[13]	穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘旸, 刘泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[14]	金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[15]	张聪, 梁经纬, 阳军生, 曹磊, 谢亦朋, 张贵金, . 堤坝脉动注浆浆液扩散机制及应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1507-1514.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed