›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (9): 2729-2734.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

干湿循环作用下膨胀土裂隙演化规律试验研究

张家俊1, 2,龚壁卫2,胡 波2,周小文1,王 军1, 2   

  1. 1. 华南理工大学 亚热带建筑科学国家重点试验室,广州 510640;2. 长江科学院 水利部岩土力学与工程重点试验室,武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2010-01-28 出版日期:2011-09-10 发布日期:2011-09-13
  • 作者简介:张家俊,男,1984年生,硕士研究生,主要从事特殊土性质的研究工作
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助(No. 51008035);水利部岩土力学与工程重点实验室开放基金(No. G07-02)

Study of evolution law of fissures of expansive clay under wetting and drying cycles

ZHANG Jia-jun1, 2,GONG Bi-wei2,HU Bo2,ZHOU Xiao-wen1,WANG Jun1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Subtropical Building Science, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510640, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Mechanics and Engineering of Ministry of Water Resources, Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, Wuhan 430010, China
  • Received:2010-01-28 Online:2011-09-10 Published:2011-09-13

摘要: 对南阳膨胀土在反复干湿循环作用下的裂隙演化规律进行了室内试验研究。试验中采用烘干法模拟脱湿过程,采用抽气饱和法模拟饱和过程。在脱湿过程中,定时对土样进行称重、定点拍照,以记录裂隙发育状况。利用矢量图技术对裂隙照片进行矢量化处理,以提取裂隙的各种几何要素,继而进行裂隙度计算。裂隙度变化规律分析结果表明,影响裂隙张开程度的关键因素并非土体含水率,而是含水率梯度,而脱湿速率的空间分布、土块渗透特性以及土块尺寸大小则是决定含水率梯度大小的关键因素;膨胀土裂隙在干湿循环的作用下会逐步发育,主要体现在裂隙总面积与总长度的增加,但此作用有限,裂隙的发育达到一定程度以后便会因为土块尺寸过小而停止;反复干湿循环会使土体产生范性变形,该范性变形与完整土块的胀缩特性并无直接联系,其主要成因是裂隙的发育与土体完整性的破坏,裂隙越发育,土体范性变形量越大

关键词: 膨胀土, 干湿循环, 裂隙演化规律, 裂隙度, 矢量图

Abstract: In the present investigation, laboratorial test is conducted to study the evolution law of the fissures of Nanyang expansive clay under wetting and drying cycles. Oven drying method and vacuum saturating method are employed to simulate the drying and wetting process respectively. In order to record the development of fissures, the specimen is weighed and photographed regularly during the drying process. By employing the vector diagram technology to vectorize the fissures photos; the geometric characters of fissures are extracted before calculating the fissures ratios. Study of the regularity of fissures ratios changes proves that: the essential factor that influences the stretching degree of fissures is not water content, but the gradient of water content, which is mainly governed by the spatial distribution of desorption rate, the permeability characteristic of clod and the size of clod. Under wetting and drying cycles, the fissures of expansive clay will develop gradually, and it is mainly represented by the increase of total area and total length of fissures, but the role of wetting and drying cycles is limited, the development of fissures will cease when it comes to a certain degree due to the undersize of the clods. Expansive soil mass will encounter plastic deformation under wetting and drying cycles; this plastic deformation is not relevant to the swell-shrink characteristics of expansive clay, the development of fissures and the damage of soil mass integrity are the direct causes of this plastic deformation; a higher degree of fissures development gives rise to a more significant plastic deformation

Key words: expansive clay, wetting and drying cycles, evolution law of fissures, fissures ratio, vector diagram

中图分类号: 

  • TU 443
[1] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[2] 谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[3] 刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[4] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[5] 陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[6] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[7] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[8] 任克彬, 王 博, 李新明, 尹 松, . 毛细水干湿循环作用下土遗址的强度特性 与孔隙分布特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 962-970.
[9] 江强强, 刘路路, 焦玉勇, 王 浩, . 干湿循环下滑带土强度特性与微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1005-1012.
[10] 谢凯楠, 姜德义, 孙中光, 宋中强, 王静怡, 杨 涛, 蒋 翔, . 基于低场核磁共振的干湿循环对泥质砂岩 微观结构劣化特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 653-659.
[11] 蔡正银, 朱 洵, 黄英豪, 张 晨. 冻融过程对膨胀土裂隙演化特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4555-4563.
[12] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 卸荷损伤原状膨胀土剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4685-4692.
[13] 梁维云, 韦昌富, 颜荣涛, 杨德欢. NaCl溶液饱和膨胀土的压缩特性及其微观机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4759-4766.
[14] 张善凯, 冷先伦, 盛谦, 李彪, 周永强, . 卢氏膨胀岩在干湿循环作用下的胀缩特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4279-4288.
[15] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 原状膨胀土剪切力学特性的卸荷速率 效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3758-3766.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 唐明明,王芝银,马兰平,曾志华,张之沛. 油气管道穿越黄土冲沟的管线设计参数研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1314 -1318 .
[2] 张广明,刘 合,张 劲,吴恒安,王秀喜. 储层流固耦合的数学模型和非线性有限元方程[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1657 -1662 .
[3] 梅国雄,卢廷浩,陈 浩,李 治. 考虑初始应力的坑侧土体真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2079 -2082 .
[4] 李俊才,纪广强,宋桂华,张 琼,王志亮,严小敏. 高层建筑疏桩筏板基础现场实测与分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1018 -1022 .
[5] 魏 宁,李小春,王 燕,谷志孟. 城市垃圾填埋场甲烷资源量与利用前景[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1687 -1692 .
[6] 牛文杰,叶为民,刘绍刚,禹海涛. 考虑饱和-非饱和渗流的土坡极限分析[J]. , 2009, 30(8): 2477 -2482 .
[7] 王可良,刘 玲,隋同波,徐运海, 胡廷正. 坝体岩基-橡胶粉改性混凝土现场抗剪(断)试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 753 -756 .
[8] 邓东平,李 亮,赵炼恒. 基于Janbu法的边坡整体稳定性滑动面搜索新方法[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 891 -898 .
[9] 吴 剑,冯少孔,李宏阶. 钻孔成像中结构面自动判读技术研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 951 -957 .
[10] 李建军,邵生俊,杨扶银,杨春鸣. 防渗墙粗粒土槽孔泥皮的抗渗性试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1087 -1093 .