岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (12): 4759-4766.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0826

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

NaCl溶液饱和膨胀土的压缩特性及其微观机制

梁维云,韦昌富,颜荣涛,杨德欢   

  1. 桂林理工大学 广西岩土力学与工程重点实验室,广西 桂林 541004
  • 收稿日期:2019-05-10 出版日期:2019-12-11 发布日期:2020-01-04
  • 通讯作者: 韦昌富,男,1966年生,博士,研究员,博士生导师,主要从事非饱和土力学与多相孔隙介质多场耦合问题的研究工作。E-mail:cfwei@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:lwyxy2013@163.com
  • 作者简介:梁维云,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事有关于化学?力学耦合岩土工程问题的研究工作
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.41572293,No.11562007,No.11372078);广西自然科学基金(No.2017GXNSFAA198215)。

Microstructure and compression characteristics of NaCl solutions saturated expansive soil

LIANG Wei-yun, WEI Chang-fu, YAN Rong-tao, YANG De-huan   

  1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, Guangxi 541004, China
  • Received:2019-05-10 Online:2019-12-11 Published:2020-01-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(41572293, 11562007, 11372078) and the Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi (2017GXNSFAA198215).

摘要: 孔隙溶液浓度及组份改变会影响膨胀土颗粒间作用力,改变微观孔隙结构,从而影响土体的物理力学特性。为此,以宁明膨胀土为研究对象,采用不同浓度NaCl溶液制备泥浆预固结重塑样开展一维压缩试验和压汞试验,研究化学作用对重塑天然膨胀土的压缩性和微观孔隙结构的影响规律。结果表明:随着渗透吸力增加,颗粒间水化能力降低,物理化学力使土颗粒由分散状态转变为集聚体状态,形成了集聚体内孔和集聚体间孔,土体表现出双峰孔隙分布特征。预固结样(压力为20 kPa)的初始孔隙比随渗透吸力增加而减小,进而导致固结屈服应力增加;但是渗透吸力对压缩性影响不大,压缩指数和回弹指数基本不变。此外,利用固结系数计算了土体的渗透系数,随着竖向压力增加渗透系数降低;当竖向压力小于200 kPa时,随着渗透吸力增加,渗透系数先增加后减小,但是竖向压力超过200 kPa后,渗透系数变化不大。分析发现,渗透吸力增加导致大孔隙增加,渗透系数增加,但同时密实度增加会导致渗透系数降低,低竖向压力下渗透性受密实度和微观孔隙结构变化耦合作用控制。

关键词: 膨胀土, NaCl溶液, 微观孔隙结构, 一维压缩试验

Abstract: Pore water chemistry will change the intergranular force and directly affect the microstructure, the physical mechanical properties are further affected for clays. To investigate the effect of pore solution on the compressive properties and microstructure of remolded nature clay, one-dimensional compression test and mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) were carried out on the Ningming expansive soil which saturated with the NaCl solutions. The results show that with the increase of osmotic suction, the particles change from uniform dispersion to flocculation structure and forming intra-aggregate pore and inter-aggregate pore. Thus, the salt content specimens exhibit a double pore-size distribution. The initial void ratio of pre-consolidated sample (20 kPa) decreased with the increase of osmotic suction, leading to the increase of consolidation yield stress. However, the osmotic suction had little effect on the compression and swelling index. The permeability decreased with the increase of vertical pressure. When the vertical pressure is lower than 200 kPa, the permeability increased first and then decreased with increasing osmotic suction, but as vertical pressure is greater than 200 kPa, the effect of osmotic suction on permeability was negligible. It is found that the permeability under low pressure is controlled by the coupling effect of microstructure and density. The increase of osmotic suction leads to the increase of macropore and permeability, while permeability is decreased with the increase of density.

Key words: expensive soil, NaCl solutions, microstructure, one-dimensional compression test

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 骆赵刚, 汪时机, 杨振北, . 膨胀土湿干胀缩裂隙演化及其定量分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2313-2323.
[2] 庄心善, 赵汉文, 王俊翔, 黄勇杰, 胡智. 循环荷载下重塑弱膨胀土滞回曲线 形态特征定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1845-1854.
[3] 谢辉辉, 许振浩, 刘清秉, 胡桂阳, . 干湿循环路径下弱膨胀土峰值及残余强度演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 245-252.
[4] 刘祖强, 罗红明, 郑敏, 施云江, . 南水北调渠坡膨胀土胀缩特性及变形模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 409-414.
[5] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[6] 陈永青, 文畅平, 方炫强, . 生物酶改良膨胀土的修正殷宗泽模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3515-3523.
[7] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[8] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[9] 蔡正银, 朱 洵, 黄英豪, 张 晨. 冻融过程对膨胀土裂隙演化特征的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4555-4563.
[10] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 卸荷损伤原状膨胀土剪切力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4685-4692.
[11] 李静, 孔祥超, 宋明水, 汪勇, 王昊, 刘旭亮, . 储层岩石微观孔隙结构对岩石力学特性 及裂缝扩展影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4149-4156.
[12] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 原状膨胀土剪切力学特性的卸荷速率 效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3758-3766.
[13] 郑俊杰, 吕思祺, 曹文昭, 景 丹, . 高填方膨胀土作用下刚柔复合桩基 挡墙结构数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
[14] 庄心善, 王俊翔, 王 康, 李 凯, 胡 智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[15] 李国维, 施赛杰, 侯宇宙, 吴建涛, 李 峰, 吴少甫, . 引江济淮试验工程非膨胀土开发技术实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 302-314.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!