›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (7): 1899-1906.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄土斜坡桩基竖向荷载传递规律现场试验研究

牛富生1, 2,许建聪1, 2,马 亢2, 3   

  1. 1. 同济大学 地下建筑与工程系,上海 200092;2. 同济大学 岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室,上海 200092; 3. 厦门大学 土木工程系,福建 厦门 361005
  • 收稿日期:2013-06-19 出版日期:2014-07-10 发布日期:2014-07-11
  • 作者简介:牛富生,男,1983年生,博士研究生,主要从事桥梁桩基工程、隧道及地下工程方面的工作
  • 基金资助:

    交通部西部交通建设科技项目(No. 2009318812004);国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51209180,No. 40872179);中国博士后科学基金 (No. 2012M510137)。

Field experimental study of transmitted characteristics of pile foundation under vertical load in loess slope

NIU Fu-sheng1, 2,XU Jian-cong1, 2,MA Kang2, 3   

  1. 1. Department of Geotechnical Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China; 3. Department of Civil Engineering, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian 361005, China
  • Received:2013-06-19 Online:2014-07-10 Published:2014-07-11

摘要: 结合某黄土斜坡桥梁桩基工程,对同一坡度相近位置的两根桩基开展现场试验,研究其在不同竖向荷载工况下的桩身上、下坡面两侧的轴力、桩侧摩阻力及桩侧土压力的传递规律与分布特征。试验表明:桩基荷载传递具有明显的区域性,第1区域是从桩顶至约3倍桩径深度处,此区域上坡面桩侧轴力较下坡面相应位置小,且其轴力随深度递减幅度及侧摩阻力发挥程度均较下坡面桩侧大;第2区域是从约3倍桩径至10倍桩径深度处,桩身上坡面一侧竖向受力减小幅度小于桩基下坡面一侧,但此时下坡面桩侧摩阻力发挥幅度大于桩基上坡面一侧;第3区域是从约10倍桩径直至桩端,该区桩身两侧轴力差异不大,摩阻力发挥幅度相近,荷载平衡协调且向下传递稳定。针对斜坡桥梁桩基上、下坡面两侧所受土压力的不均匀性,对设计桩基竖向承载力进行了一定程度地折减,并对计算公式作了相应修正,研究结论可供类似工程参考、借鉴。

关键词: 黄土斜坡桩基, 竖向承载特性, 现场试验, 区域性, 承载力的折减

Abstract: Combined with the pile foundation engineering constructed in loess slope for supporting super bridge, field experiments on two neighboring piles at the same slope region are conducted to investigate transmitted characteristics as well as distribution feature of axial force, skin friction and lateral earth pressure of both upslope side and downslope side under different vertical load cases. The test results show that load transmitting of pile foundation can be obviously classified into 3 regions. The first region covers from pile head to about the depth of three times pile diameter; within this region, the axial force developed in pile upslope side is less than corresponding position at downslope side; moreover, its decrease extent with pile depth and work efficiency of skin friction are greater than pile downslope side. The second region is within about pile depth of three times to ten times pile diameter, which shows a less axial force decrease extent with pile depth in upslope side and higher work efficiency of skin friction along downslope side at the same elevation. The third region starts from the pile depth of about ten times pile diameter and ends with pile tip. For pile body in this region, the difference of axial force and skin friction for two sides at the same elevation are insignificant; and the load from super region could be even and well-distributed transmitted downwards. For the special issue of uneven earth pressure of pile foundation installed in loess slope, certain reduction in some degree for vertical bearing capacity of pile design is conducted; and some necessary revision of the calculation formula is made. The acquired study results can provide a reference for other similar pile foundation.

Key words: pile foundation in loess slope, vertical bearing capacity, field test, regionalism, reduction of bearing capacity

中图分类号: 

  • TU 444
[1] 陆晨凯, 孔纲强, 孙广超, 陈斌, 殷高翔, . 桩−筏基础中能量桩热−力耦合特性现场试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3569-3575.
[2] 冯君, 王洋, 吴红刚, 赖冰, 谢先当, . 玄武岩纤维复合材料土层锚杆抗拔性能 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2563-2573.
[3] 吴爽爽, 胡新丽, 龚辉, 周昌, 徐楚, 王强, 应春业, . 3种模式下钻孔灌注桩桩-土剪切特性 现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2838-2846.
[4] 余 瑜, 刘新荣, 刘永权, . 基坑锚索预应力损失规律现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1932-1939.
[5] 王钦科, 马建林, 胡中波, 王 滨, . 浅覆盖层软质岩中抗拔桩承载特性现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1498-1506.
[6] 信亚雯, 周志芳, 马 筠, 李鸣威, 陈 朦, 汪 姗, 胡尊乐, . 基于现场双管试验确定弱透水层水力参数的方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1535-1542.
[7] 李 驰, 王 硕, 王燕星, 高 瑜, 斯日古楞, . 沙漠微生物矿化覆膜及其稳定性的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1291-1298.
[8] 任连伟, 孔纲强, 郝耀虎, 刘汉龙, . 基于能量桩现场试验的土体综合热导率系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4857-4864.
[9] 崔光耀, 祁家所, 王明胜, . 片理化玄武岩隧道围岩大变形控制现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 231-237.
[10] 王炳龙,梅 祯,肖军华. 土工格室补强路基整治路基病害的试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 325-332.
[11] 郭 飞,陶连金,孔 恒,马红红,张丽丽,张新全,. 兰州砂卵石地层盾构施工振动传播及衰减特性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3377-3384.
[12] 喻豪俊,彭社琴,赵其华,. 碎石土斜坡水平受荷桩承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2537-2545.
[13] 王翔鹰,陈育民,江 强,刘汉龙, . 抗液化排水刚性桩沉桩过程的土压力响应[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2184-2192.
[14] 付海清,袁晓铭,王 淼,. 基于现场液化试验的饱和砂土孔压增量计算模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1611-1618.
[15] 李自强,徐湉 源,吴秋军,于 丽,王明年,王子健,. 破碎围岩重载铁路隧道基底结构动力特性现场试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 949-956.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 刘玉成,曹树刚,刘延保. 可描述地表沉陷动态过程的时间函数模型探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925 -931 .
[3] 刘恩龙. 岩土破损力学:结构块破损机制与二元介质模型[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 13 -22 .
[4] 介玉新,杨光华. 基于广义位势理论的弹塑性模型的修正方法[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[5] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[6] 周 华,王国进,傅少君,邹丽春,陈胜宏. 小湾拱坝坝基开挖卸荷松弛效应的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[7] 叶 飞,朱合华,何 川. 盾构隧道壁后注浆扩散模式及对管片的压力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[8] 陈 林,张永兴,冉可新. 考虑剪应力作用的挡土墙主动土压力计算[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 219 -223 .
[9] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[10] 石 崇 ,徐卫亚 ,张 玉 ,李德亮 ,刘 和. 基于元胞自动机模型的堆积体动力学参数研究[J]. , 2011, 32(6): 1795 -1800 .