›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 119-125.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.01.014

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于轴对称模型的管桩竖向振动研究

刘林超,闫启方,王 颂,陈晴晴   

  1. 信阳师范学院 土木工程学院,河南 信阳 464000
  • 收稿日期:2014-05-16 出版日期:2016-01-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:刘林超,男,1979年生,博士,副教授,主要从事黏弹性理论、岩土力学等方面的教学和科研。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金(No.U1504505);河南省科技发展计划项目(No.142300410200);河南省高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划项目(No.2013GGJS-121);信阳师范学院南湖学者奖励计划青年项目(No.201506)。

Vertical vibration of pipe pile based on axisymmetric model

LIU Lin-chao, YAN Qi-fang, WANG Song, CHEN Qing-qing   

  1. School of Civil Engineering, Xinyang Normal University, Xinyang, Henan 464000, China
  • Received:2014-05-16 Online:2016-01-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1504505), Henan Foundation for Development of Science and Technology (142300410200), the Foundation for Outstanding Young Teachers in Higher Education Institutions of Henan Province (2013GGJS-121) and Nanhu Scholars Program for Young Scholars of Xinyang Normal University (201506).

摘要: 在管桩沉桩过程中产生的闭塞效应以及桩芯土的存在,使得管桩的力学特性与实心桩存在着差异,因此需要考察桩周土和桩芯土力学性质的差异对管桩振动的影响。将桩周土、桩芯土和管桩视为一个整体,利用轴对称模型和桩-土接触面的连续性条件得到了管桩的竖向振动解,为了比较,也给出了管桩竖向振动的欧拉模型解。借助数值算例,对比分析了管桩竖向振动采用轴对称模型和欧拉模型得到的桩顶复刚度,并分析了桩周土、桩芯土和桩体本身物理参数对管桩竖向振动的影响。研究结果表明,轴对称模型得到的桩顶复刚度较欧拉模型的结果小,两种模型得到的结果存在一定的差异;桩周土剪切模量比桩芯土剪切模量大时,桩基动刚度和动阻尼则较小;桩顶的复刚度随管桩壁厚的减小而减小,因此,管桩管壁不宜过薄。在进行管桩设计时,需要考虑土体性质对桩基振动特性的影响,合理选择管桩内、外半径和桩长。

关键词: 管桩, 轴对称模型, 竖向振动, 复刚度

Abstract: The mechanical properties of pipe pile and solid pile are significantly different due to the plugging effect and the existence of pile core soil during pile driving process. Hence it is necessary to study the influence of the difference between the soil around the pile and pile core soil on the vibration of pipe pile in soil. By using the axisymmetric model and pile-soil contact surface continuity conditions, the solutions to vertical vibration of pipe pile in soil are obtained with the soil around the pile, pile core soil and pipe pile as a whole. For comparison, the Euler model-based solutions are also derived. Comparisons are performed among the results obtained by various methods. The results indicate that the complex stiffness at pile head obtained by using axisymmetric model is smaller than the complex stiffness obtained with Euler model, and there exists a certain gap between the results by the two models. The dynamic stiffness and dynamic damping becomes smaller when the shear modulus of soil around pile is larger than that of the pile core soil. The complex stiffness at pile head is smaller when the wall thickness is smaller. Hence the wall of pipe pile should not be too thin. In the design of pipe pile, it is necessary to consider the influence of soil properties on the vibration of pipe pile in soil, and properly select the interior radius, outer radius and length of the pipe pile.

Key words: pipe pile, axisymmetric model, vertical vibration, complex stiffness

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 唐晓武, 柳江南, 杨晓秋, 俞悦. 开孔管桩动孔压消散特性的理论研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3335-3343.
[2] 唐晓武, 杨晓秋, 俞 悦. 开孔管桩复合地基排水固结解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1248-1254.
[3] 崔春义, 孟 坤, 武亚军, 马科研, 梁志孟, . 轴对称径向非均质土中单桩纵向振动特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 570-579.
[4] 吴建涛, 叶 霄, 李国维, 蒋 超, 曹雪山, . 高路堤下PHC桩加固软土地基的承载及变形特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 351-358.
[5] 刘林超,肖琪聃,闫启方. 基于土体三维波动模型的饱和土中管桩竖向振动[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1720-1730.
[6] 胡贺松, 陈晓斌, 唐孟雄, 廖湘英, 肖源杰, . 随钻跟管桩桩-土接触面作用机制 大型直剪试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4325-4334.
[7] 王 腾, 薛 浩, 吴 瑞. 黏土中静压管桩土塞机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4335-4341.
[8] 徐 江,龚维明,张 琦,戴国亮,霍少磊,杨 超, . 大口径钢管斜桩竖向承载特性数值模拟与现场试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2434-2440.
[9] 王家全,刘垒雷,朱庆盛,张 昊,. 红黏土地层静压闭口管桩残余应力模型试验分析[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1878-1886.
[10] 吴文兵,邓国栋,张家生,黄生根,. 考虑横向惯性效应时桩侧土-管桩-土塞纵向耦合振动特性研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 993-1002.
[11] 刘林超,闫启方,闫 盼. 考虑三维波动的饱和土中管桩群桩的水平振动研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2817-2825.
[12] 郑长杰,丁选明,栾鲁宝, . 黏弹性地基中管桩水平动力特性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 26-32.
[13] 乐腾胜,雷金波,周 星,何利军,易 飞,廖幼孙,. 有孔管桩单桩承载性状试验及分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 415-420.
[14] 朱冰儿,齐昌广,鲍娇蕾. 路堤荷载下塑料套管桩荷载传递机制的现场试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 658-664.
[15] 郑长杰,丁选明,安淑红,. 横观各向同性地基中管桩扭转振动响应解析解[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2477-2483.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!