›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 175-184.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.01.021

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

应变软化边坡渐进破坏及其稳定性初步研究

沈华章,王水林,郭明伟,葛修润   

  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-10 出版日期:2016-01-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:沈华章,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事应变软化本构和边坡稳定性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51179185, No.41472289, No.41302236);国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(No.2014CB047100)。

A preliminary study of the progressive failure and stability of slope with strain-softening behaviour

SHEN Hua-zhang, WANG Shui-lin, GUO Ming-wei, GE Xiu-run   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechanical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2014-12-10 Online:2016-01-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51179185, 41472289, 41302236) and the National Program on Key Basic Research Project of China (973 Program) (2014CB047100).

摘要: 采用应变软化本构模型和矢量和法,提出了一种模拟应变软化边坡渐进性破坏过程的分析方法。该方法可得到应变软化边坡的坡体材料强度参数、滑面状态、稳定安全系数、边坡破坏状态的变化过程,据此可分析边坡的渐进破坏。采用所提方法对应变软化材料边坡算例进行了分析,并与3种极限平衡法进行了对比,结果表明:(1)滑面矢量和安全系数介于传统极限平衡法峰值安全系数与残余安全系数之间,滑面强度参数部分处于峰值状态、部分处于残余状态,弥补了传统极限平衡法不能得到真实的应变软化边坡安全系数的缺陷。(2)强度参数弱化的区域与边坡破坏区域位置一致,坡脚处滑面最先出现软化,随着塑性剪切破坏的发展,其由软化状态变为残余状态,邻近部分滑面开始出现新的软化,接着进入残余状态,边坡破坏由坡脚向坡顶发展,随着这个过程的持续进行,边坡的渐进性破坏不断发展,边坡安全系数不断降低,直至渐进性破坏过程结束。(3)随着残余软化参数的增加,滑面位置逐渐变浅,矢量和法安全系数逐渐增加。该方法能够较好地分析边坡的渐进性破坏过程,具有较好的应用前景。

关键词: 渐进性破坏, 矢量和法, 应变软化, 边坡稳定性

Abstract: By means of the vector sum method and strain-softening constitutive model, a method for progressive failure analysis of strain-softening slopes is developed, which can show the processes of variations of the strain-softening slope safety factor, strength parameters, and failure state of slope and slip. Based on this, progressive failure progress of slope with strain-softening behavior can be simulated. Numerical results are compared to those of the limit equilibrium methods, showing the validity of the proposed method. It is shown that the vector sum method safety factor are in between peak and residual safety factors by the limit equilibrium method; the strength parameters of the main part of slip surface are at the peak value, and the other at the residual value; the proposed method compensates for the defect of the traditional limit equilibrium methods failing to provide a realistic safety factor of slope with strain-softening behavior. The strength weakening zone is found to be consistent with the failure zone in the slope. In the shearing process, the strain-softening behavior first occurs at the toe of the slope, and the strength parameters reduce to the residual value at the toe of the slope; then new strain-softening behaviors occur at the adjacent zone and then enter the residual state; finally the progressive failure develops from the toe of slope to the top of the slope. As the process continues, the progressive failure gradually develops and the safety factor decreases until the end of the progressive failure is reached. The safety factor increases with the increase of residual soft parameter, and the position of critical slip surface moves towards shallow, resulting in an increase of the vector sum method safety factor.

Key words: progressive failure analysis, vector sum method, strain-softening, slope stability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1

[1] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[2] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[3] 史振宁, 戚双星, 付宏渊, 曾铃, 何忠明, 方睿敏, . 降雨入渗条件下土质边坡含水率分 布与浅层稳定性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 980-988.
[4] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[5] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[6] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[7] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 雷 涛, 刘 琪, 王智猛, 刘 勇, . 考虑填土强度的加筋土挡墙动位移计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[8] 王凤云, 钱德玲, . 基于统一强度理论深埋圆形隧道围岩的剪胀分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[9] 余 国, 谢谟文, 郑正勤, 覃事河, 杜 岩, . 基于GIS的边坡稳定性计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1397-1404.
[10] 王 腾, 吴 瑞. 黏土中海底管线竖向贯入阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 871-878.
[11] 张龙飞, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 康田. 推移式缓倾浅层滑坡渐进破坏力学模型 与稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4767-4776.
[12] 夏侯云山, 张抒, 唐辉明, 刘晓, 吴琼, . 考虑参数空间变异结构的结构化交叉约束 随机场模拟方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4935-4945.
[13] 唐洪祥, 韦文成. 耦合强度各向异性与应变软化的边坡稳定 有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4092-4100.
[14] 尹小涛,薛海斌,汤 华,任兴文,宋 罡,. 边坡局部和整体稳定性评价方法的辩证统一[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 98-104.
[15] 代仲海,胡再强,尹小涛,吴振君,. 工程荷载作用下缓倾角反倾似层状岩质边坡变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 412-418.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!