›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 517-523.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.02.025

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于量化GSI系统的破碎岩体应变软化行为研究

张向东,张哲诚,杨博维,郝矛矛,杨夫泽   

  1. 辽宁工程技术大学 土木与交通学院,辽宁 阜新 123000
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-22 出版日期:2016-02-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 张哲诚,男,1990年生,博士,主要从事岩土工程方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail: 610360001@qq.com E-mail:jwd101@126.com
  • 作者简介:张向东,男,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土与地下工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51174268)。

Strain softening behavior of broken rock mass based on a quantitative GSI system

ZHANG Xiang-dong, ZHANG Zhe-cheng, YANG Bo-wei, HAO Mao-mao, YANG Fu-ze   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Transportation, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning 123000, China
  • Received:2014-07-22 Online:2016-02-11 Published:2018-06-09
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51174268).

摘要: 松软破碎岩体的复杂力学特性给深部开采工程带来一系列棘手的问题,深入研究破碎岩体峰后力学行为,对于深部巷道围岩稳定性分析及支护结构设计具有重要意义。基于量化GSI围岩评级系统及连续介质理论,建立了考虑围压影响的破碎岩体峰后应变软化力学模型。通过工程应用实例验证了数值模型的可靠性。研究结果表明:通过计算围岩与支护结构相互作用关系可知,理想弹塑性模型和应变软化模型所得计算结果差异较大,采用理想弹塑性模型进行支护设计,可能导致支护结构的安全性偏低,甚至失稳。现场应用结果表明:数值计算结果与现场实际情况吻合;提出的深部破碎岩体应变软化模型能够较为真实地反映破碎岩体的非线性破坏行为,可为硐室围岩稳定性分析及支护结构设计等提供新的思路。

关键词: 破碎岩体, 应变软化, 地质强度指标(GSI), 围岩-支护相互作用

Abstract: The complex mechanical properties of soft broken rock mass lead to a series of challenging issues in deep mining engineering. In-depth study of the post peak mechanical behavior of broken rock mass is significant for analyzing the stability of surrounding rock and designing support structures in deep roadway. By considering the effect of confining pressure, a mechanical model of the post peak strain softening is established on the basis of a quantitative geological stremth index (GSI) evaluation system of surrounding rock and the continuous media theory. The reliability of the proposed model is verified by comparing numerical results with an application of a field engineering project. By calculating the relationships between surrounding rock and support structure, it is indicated that calculated results by the ideal elastic-plastic model and by the strain softening model are obviously different. The use of ideal elastic-plastic model may lead to a low safety and even instability of the support structure. Field application results are in good agreement with numerical results. The proposed model can reflect the nonlinear failure behavior of broken rock mass and provide new insights into the stability analysis of surrounding rock and the design of support structure.

Key words: broken rock mass, strain softening, geological strength index (GSI), interaction of surrounding rock and support

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[2] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的岩石应变软化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 939-951.
[3] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[4] 金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 基于应变软化指标的岩石非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2239-2246.
[5] 徐 鹏, 蒋关鲁, 雷 涛, 刘 琪, 王智猛, 刘 勇, . 考虑填土强度的加筋土挡墙动位移计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1841-1846.
[6] 王凤云, 钱德玲, . 基于统一强度理论深埋圆形隧道围岩的剪胀分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[7] 王 腾, 吴 瑞. 黏土中海底管线竖向贯入阻力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 871-878.
[8] 张龙飞, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 康田. 推移式缓倾浅层滑坡渐进破坏力学模型 与稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4767-4776.
[9] 唐洪祥, 韦文成. 耦合强度各向异性与应变软化的边坡稳定 有限元分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4092-4100.
[10] 王凤云,钱德玲. 基于切向应变软化的深埋圆形隧道围岩弹塑性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3313-3320.
[11] 朱德福,屠世浩,袁 永,马行生, 李向阳, . 破碎岩体压实特性的三维离散元数值计算方法研究[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1047-1055.
[12] 王 振,叶晓明,刘永新,. 考虑滑坡渐进破坏的改进简布条分法[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 675-682.
[13] 邓 琴,汤 华,王东英,秦雨樵,吴振君,. 基于应变软化的多阶边坡稳定分析[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4109-4116.
[14] 刘冬桥,王 焯,张晓云, . 岩石应变软化变形特性及损伤本构模型研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2901-2908.
[15] 范志强,唐辉明,汪丁建,刘 凯,温 韬. 考虑土体应变软化特性的滑坡抗滑桩设计推力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 665-672.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!