›› 2016, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 1118-1126.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.04.026

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于超载法的拱坝坝肩地震动力稳定性方法研究

曾海艳1,张建海1,刘喜康1,王震洲1,赵文光2,王仁坤2   

  1. 1. 四川大学 水利水电学院 水力学及山区河流开发与保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610065; 2. 中国水电顾问集团成都勘测设计研究院,四川 成都 610072
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-08 出版日期:2016-04-11 发布日期:2018-06-09
  • 作者简介:曾海艳,1989年生,女,硕士,主要从事岩土工程数值模拟、大坝与基础工程等方面的研究工作。

Research on seismic dynamic stability of arch dam abutment based on overload method

ZENG Hai-yan1,ZHANG Jian-hai1,LIU Xi-kang1,WANG Zhen-zhou1,ZHAO Wen-guang2,WANG Ren-kun2   

  1. 1.State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Development and Protection, College of Water Resources & Hydropower, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China; 2. China Hydropower Engineering Consulting Group Chengdu Design & Research Institute, Chengdu, Sichuan 610072, China
  • Received:2014-07-08 Online:2016-04-11 Published:2018-06-09

摘要: 拱坝坝肩地震动力稳定性一直是工程界关注的一大热点,然而对坝肩动力稳定性的评判方法和标准的研究还不成熟。为完善坝肩动力稳定分析方法,将有限元法与刚体极限平衡法的优势相结合,提出了地震动力超载方法以及极限累积位移评判标准。首先,基于有限元法开展实时动力分析,对坝肩可能的滑移块体采用多重网格应力插值求任意时刻的阻滑力和下滑力,确定其主滑方向,而后采用刚体极限平衡法计算每个滑块的动安全系数;同时,对瞬时动安全系数小于1.0的时段,进行加速度积分,求出滑块累积失稳位移。结合滑块尺寸及滑动面强度参数提出极限累积位移计算公式作为失稳判据,通过比较累积位移与极限累积位移判定滑块的稳定性。基于以上思路开发了一套坝肩动力稳定分析系统SAFEDAM。以沙牌拱坝经受反映5.12地震的人工波为例,开展了沙牌拱坝坝肩动力超载稳定分析,验证了极限累积位移判据的合理性。研究表明,沙牌左岸坝肩超载稳定安全倍数Kp0 =3.2,右岸坝肩超载稳定安全倍数Kp0 =4.2。工程实例计算表明,该方法计算坝肩动力稳定性使用较为方便可靠,具有较大的工程实用价值,为坝肩动力稳定性分析和评价提供了一条新路径。

关键词: 坝肩稳定性, 地震, 动力超载分析, 安全系数, 极限累积位移

Abstract: Seismic dynamic stability analysis of arch dam abutment has been a hot topic in geotechnical engineering. However, studies are not yet mature on the evaluation methods and criteria of dam abutment dynamic stability. The advantage of the finite element method and limit equilibrium method are combined to improve the abutment dynamic stability analysis method. Then the seismic dynamic overload method and limit cumulative displacement criterion are proposed. Firstly, a real-time dynamic analysis is conducted based on the finite element method. Secondly, multi-grid method is adopted to calculate the resistance force and sliding force of abutment potential slip blocks through stress interpolation, it can determine the main sliding direction and calculate the dynamic safety factor using the limit equilibrium method for each slider. Meanwhile, there is an acceleration integral to get the cumulative displacement of slip blocks for the period within which the safety factor is less then 1.0. According to the slider size and the sliding surface strength parameters, the limit cumulative displacement formulation is proposed and acted as the instability criterion of slip blocks; by comparing the cumulative displacement and the limit cumulative displacement, the stability of the slider is determined. An abutment dynamic stability analysis system SAFEDAM is established from the above ideas. To verify the rationality of the limit cumulative displacement criterion, Shapai arch dam is taken as example which has underwent the Wenchuan 5.12 earthquake in Sichuan province. The results show that for the left bank abutment of Shapai arch dam, the overload stability safety factor Kp0 is 3.2, while for the right bank the Kp0 is 4.2. The example study confirms that the proposed method provides a new path for the dynamic stability of arch dam abutment and evaluation. For the reliability and flexibility to assess the dynamic stability analysis, the method shows its wide applicability in engineering practice.

Key words: abutment stability, seism, dynamic overload analysis, safety factor, limit cumulative displacement

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435

[1] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[2] 肖世国, 刘航, 于昕左. 水平柔性拉筋式重力墙−坡体地震整体 稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1836-1844.
[3] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[4] 韩俊艳, 李满君, 钟紫蓝, 许敬叔, 李立云, 兰景岩, 杜修力. 基于埋地管道非一致激励振动台 试验的土层地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1653-1662.
[5] 肖明清, 徐晨, . 基于临界稳定断面的隧道围岩稳定性分析方法探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1690-1698.
[6] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[7] 李平, 张宇东, 薄涛, 辜俊儒, 朱胜. 基于离心机振动台试验的梯形河谷场地 地震动效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1270-1278.
[8] 张雪东, 蔡红, 魏迎奇, 张紫涛, 梁建辉, 胡晶. 基于动力离心试验的软基尾矿库地震响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1287-1294.
[9] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[10] 聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
[11] 张海娜, 陈从新, 郑 允, 孙朝燚, 张亚鹏, 刘秀敏, . 坡顶荷载作用下岩质边坡弯曲倾倒破坏分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2938-2946.
[12] 刘新荣, 邓志云, 刘永权, 刘树林, 路雨明, . 地震作用下水平层状岩质边坡累积损伤与 破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2507-2516.
[13] 韩俊艳, 钟紫蓝, 李立云, 赵密, 万宁潭, 杜修力. 纵向非一致激励下自由场土体的非线性 地震反应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2581-2592.
[14] 何颖, 于琴, 刘中宪, . 考虑散射效应沉积河谷空间相关多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2739-2747.
[15] 陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!