›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (S1): 51-60.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0625

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

滑坡作用下既有隧道锚索加固的物理模型试验与数值模拟研究

张治国1,2,3,张成平2,马兵兵1,宫剑飞4,叶 铜1   

  1. 1. 上海理工大学 环境与建筑学院,上海 200093;2. 北京交通大学 城市地下工程教育部重点实验室,北京100044; 3. 中国地质大学 岩土钻掘与防护教育部工程研究中心,湖北 武汉 430074;4. 中国建筑科学研究院 地基基础研究所,北京 100013
  • 收稿日期:2018-04-05 出版日期:2018-07-20 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 作者简介:张治国,男,1978年生,博士,博士后,副教授,主要从事地下工程施工对周边环境影响控制方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41772331);城市地下工程教育部重点实验室开放基金(TUE2017-04);岩土钻掘与防护教育部工程研究中心课题(2017年5月)。

Physical model test and numerical simulation for anchor cable reinforcements of existing tunnel under action of landslide

ZHANG Zhi-guo1,2,3, ZHANG Cheng-ping2, MA Bing-bing1, GONG Jian-fei4, YE Tong1   

  1. 1. School of Environment and Architecture, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 3. Engineering Research Center of Rock and Soil Drilling and Excavation and Protection of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan Hubei 430074, China; 4. Institute of Foundation Engineering, China Academy of Building Research, Beijing 100013, China
  • Received:2018-04-05 Online:2018-07-20 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China(41772331), and by open project of Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education(TUE2017-04), and by research fund of Engineering Research Center of Rock and Soil Drilling and Excavation and Protection of Ministry of Education(201705).

摘要: 工程实践中有些隧道不可避免的需要穿越滑坡变形区,在后期地质演变作用及施工扰动荷载作用下原来没有明显变形的斜坡会出现较大变形,甚至发展成滑坡,对既有隧道结构产生不同程度的病害。国内外多数学者针对隧道开挖引起的滑坡体变形影响研究较多,针对滑坡体作用下既有隧道结构的受力变形及加固措施效果研究较少。为研究山体滑坡区域既有隧道锚索加固措施下的系统力学机制,首先建立地质力学模型试验,研究不同数量锚索加固后滑坡体与隧道结构的相互作用规律,并与无锚索加固措施工况进行对比,发现增加锚索加固后滑坡体沉降、隧道弯矩、滑坡体与隧道表面接触力明显减小,而不同数量加固锚索工况下上述观测值变化不大。此外,建立了相应工况的数值模型,与物理试验结果进行了对比得到较好一致性。研究成果可为山体滑坡区域隧道锚索加固方法改进提供一定的理论依据。

关键词: 隧道, 滑坡, 锚索, 模型试验, 数值模拟

Abstract: Some tunnels are inevitably built to cross the landslide zone in actual engineering. Besides, under the action of late geological evolution and construction disturbance, the slope that has no obvious deformation or more stable slope will appear larger deformation and even develop into a landslide. Consequently, the landslide has negative effects on the tunnel structure. So tunnel structure will be affected and even be interrupted. At present, most scholars at home and abroad are focus on stress and deformation of landslide body caused by tunnel excavation. There are few studies on the force, deformation and reinforcement of existing tunnel structures under the action of landslide. In order to study the stress and deformation of the reinforcement measures of the existing tunnel cable in landslide mountain area, firstly we establish the geomechanical model test and study on the interaction between the landslide and the tunnel structure that with the reinforcement of the different number of anchors and compared with that without the reinforcement. Then, we use the numerical software to establish the model under the corresponding conditions, compared with the physical test results. It shows a good consistency. The results can provide a theoretical basis for the anchor cable reinforcements of the tunnel in the landslide mountain area.

Key words: tunnel, landslide, anchor cable, model test, numerical simulation

中图分类号: 

  • U452

[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 徐日庆, 程康, 应宏伟, 林存刚, 梁荣柱, 冯苏阳, . 考虑埋深与剪切效应的基坑卸荷下卧 隧道的形变响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 195-207.
[3] 郑刚, 栗晴瀚, 程雪松, 哈达, 赵悦镔. 承压层快速减压与回灌应用于隧道抢险的理论与设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 208-216.
[4] 张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩 承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[5] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[6] 罗刚, 张辉傲, 马国涛, 周海文, 胡卸文, 王文健, 王文沛, . 高速岩质滑坡滑面滑动摩擦特性研究——以王山 抓口寺滑坡为例[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2441-2452.
[7] 姚宏波, 李冰河, 童磊, 刘兴旺, 陈卫林. 考虑空间效应的软土隧道上方卸荷变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2453-2460.
[8] 杜文杰, 盛谦, 付晓东, 汤华, 陈贺, 杜宇翔, 周永强, . 地震作用下岩羊村滑坡稳定性与失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2461-2469.
[9] 毛浩宇, 徐奴文, 李彪, 樊义林, 吴家耀, 孟国涛, . 基于离散元模拟和微震监测的白鹤滩水电站左岸地下厂房稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2470-2484.
[10] 房昱纬, 吴振君, 盛谦, 汤华, 梁栋才, . 基于超前钻探测试的隧道地层智能识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2494-2503.
[11] 邹新军, 曹雄, 周长林, . 砂土地基中受水流影响的竖向力−水平力联合 受荷桩承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1855-1864.
[12] 程永辉, 胡胜刚, 王汉武, 张成. 深埋砂层旁压特征参数的深度效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1881-1886.
[13] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[14] 宁奕冰, 唐辉明, 张勃成, 申培武, 章广成, 夏丁, . 基于正交设计的岩石相似材料配比研究及 底摩擦物理模型试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2009-2020.
[15] 郑立夫, 高永涛, 周喻, 田书广, . 浅埋隧道冻结法施工地表冻胀融沉规律及冻结壁厚度优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2110-2121.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!